• TheOubliette
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    FOSS has always been political. And usually fairly reactionary.

      • TheOubliette
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        See: the FOSS higs that all flipped out when contributor agreements with codes of conduct like “don’t be homophobic or racist” started popping up.

        It was quite a struggle and there is still a large old guard that simply refuses to move on it.

        • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You’re greatly overestimating how many people that is; additionally, it was largely people that aren’t very committed to FOSS that got mad. The project maintainers and most users are fine with it. People who are committed to FOSS ideals are overwhelmingly progressive to leftist. That’s why those codes of conduct were added in the first place, and were largely uncontroversial amongst most actual contributors of those projects.

          • TheOubliette
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The projects that have those codes of conduct are the ones where any reactionary maintainers could be overruled. You have to look to the projects that have never had codes of conduct, the old guard and Incelie techbro spaces. Brave’s CEO is a homophobe, for example. This has been known for years, he still makes homophobic comments. Brave does not have a code of conduct or community guidelines. And basically anyone that notices and tries to address an issue like racism or transphobia with a repo suddenly finds a mass of reactionaries coming out of the woodwork.