• Alex
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m not sure how assaulting children is ever going to build an effective relationship between kids and their parents. Parents should represent safety and unconditional love because then the educational message will have an easier time being accepted by the kids.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      You’re choosing to use escalating language, instead of accurate language; With the choice of “assault”, you’re attempting to arouse an outsized emotional response in the reader. As a debate tactic, It’s a dishonest manipulation. You should try to avoid doing that.

      Besides, assault is a legal term, which includes merely the threat of violence. Battery is the actual use of violence. So even in what you were trying to do, you used the wrong term.

      • Alex
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ok I fail to see how battering kids helps them develop a bond of trust with the carers.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That’s better. It’s still escalating language, and dishonest. But at least it’s more accurate.

          And the truth is spanking doesn’t build trust. Not on its own anyway. It’s all about the context.
          Following through on an established rule with a known consequences does actually promote trust. It works as part of a holistic approach to reward and punishment.
          Spanking generally isn’t needed with many children. But with some children, it can be a effective tool when used appropriately.

          • Rimu@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            when used appropriately

            …and there’s the rub. Far too often it’s not used appropriately. And people’s ideas of what is appropriate is colored by whether they too were beaten as a child.

            • Steve@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Agreed. But that doesn’t effect my point, or even the study.

              Almost everything withan effective appropriate use can also be misused.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        You’re choosing to nitpick something that wasn’t even in question.

        “As a debate tactic…”

        This isn’t the debate club, my friend. He just made a comment. You’re overreacting. You should try to avoid doing that.

        Besides, the use of “besides” as a complete sentence with a full stop is grammatically wrong.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Besides, the use of “besides” as a complete sentence with a full stop is grammatically wrong.

          That’s true. Apologies… And corrected