• CableMonster
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    AI probably was already patched 5 minutes after the article came out.

    • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can’t really “patch” LLMs like most software; you’d have to retrain them, no?

      • OhNoMoreLemmy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah but they don’t use LLMs for this, they’ll use some other kind of machine learning mixed in a big pipeline of data processing. It makes it really hard to guess how much work it would take to fix. It might require retraining, might just require an easy patch of the rest of the pipeline.

        My guess is that they’re just shitty jumpers and there’s nothing to fix anyway.

      • CableMonster
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh I dont know, I would just assume they could update (or retrain) to adapt pretty quickly.