On February 8, we will expire the 18 colorway themes of Firefox version 94. We will also be releasing 6 brand-new colorways. Here's all you need to know.
I’m still angry becauqe it feels like shady marketing move where product success is more important than user rights. That being said, I get that Mozilla us not the anticapitalist structure I would like it to be.
“Your 94 colorway and the 97 collection will all be available within the add-ons manager.” This sentence is a clear proof to my eyes that they intended do make old themes explicitly inaccessible. Why not : “94 colorways and the 97 collection will all be available within the add-ons manager.”
Mozilla doesn’t have a profit motive, which is enough for me to give them the benefit of the doubt. (There’s the legally-non-profit “Mozilla Foundation” and the legally-for-profit “Mozilla Corporation”, but the latter is a 100% subsidiary of the former, so they cannot pay those profits out to anyone. They can only pay their employees’ wages and re-invest into their projects.)
They do still want as many people using Firefox/Gecko as possible, since that is critically important for their non-profit mission and does help them pay their employee’s wages etc., so that’s why they are doing marketing nonetheless. Google Chrome didn’t exactly gain its popularity without aggressive / anti-competitive marketing either.
As for those 94-Colorways being available in the add-ons manager, well, if you are already in the add-ons manager, you can just type into the search bar and find literal thousands of just as cool user-created themes. Some users even re-created Mozilla’s Colorway themes.
So, again, I don’t think they are hurting anybody by rotating their curated selection of themes. It would kind of defeat the point, if they kept adding to that list, since it would stop being something that users can quickly explore, and again, their themes aren’t really better than the user-created themes behind that search bar.
I’m still angry becauqe it feels like shady marketing move where product success is more important than user rights. That being said, I get that Mozilla us not the anticapitalist structure I would like it to be.
“Your 94 colorway and the 97 collection will all be available within the add-ons manager.” This sentence is a clear proof to my eyes that they intended do make old themes explicitly inaccessible. Why not : “94 colorways and the 97 collection will all be available within the add-ons manager.”
Mozilla doesn’t have a profit motive, which is enough for me to give them the benefit of the doubt. (There’s the legally-non-profit “Mozilla Foundation” and the legally-for-profit “Mozilla Corporation”, but the latter is a 100% subsidiary of the former, so they cannot pay those profits out to anyone. They can only pay their employees’ wages and re-invest into their projects.)
They do still want as many people using Firefox/Gecko as possible, since that is critically important for their non-profit mission and does help them pay their employee’s wages etc., so that’s why they are doing marketing nonetheless. Google Chrome didn’t exactly gain its popularity without aggressive / anti-competitive marketing either.
As for those 94-Colorways being available in the add-ons manager, well, if you are already in the add-ons manager, you can just type into the search bar and find literal thousands of just as cool user-created themes. Some users even re-created Mozilla’s Colorway themes.
So, again, I don’t think they are hurting anybody by rotating their curated selection of themes. It would kind of defeat the point, if they kept adding to that list, since it would stop being something that users can quickly explore, and again, their themes aren’t really better than the user-created themes behind that search bar.