We’re all too familiar with the work-play balance we strive to juggle in the 21st century. It’s virtually impossible, right? We’re often faced with a long an...
China is probably the only country in the world that executes death sentences for corrupt billionaires. So I dont think capitalists would have any chance to take back power.
I dont know what that was about, but it stopped a while ago afaik. And I’m not sure what exactly they mean by calling them “Marxists”, considering that everyone in China studies Marx in school.
The story is from a couple of years ago, so maybe that stuff got addressed since. There is a difference between studying Marx in school, and actually applying what you study in everyday life. I grew up in the Soviet Union, and we studied Marx and Lenin as well, but most people didn’t really think about theory or its application all that much unfortunately. And that’s what allowed Gorbachev and Yeltsin to do what they did. Now that people got to enjoy capitalism for a few decades they’re realizing what they lost, but clawing that back isn’t going to be easy now that Russia’s run by an oligarchy.
I understand the wisdom behind Deng’s reforms. Allowing Western companies in allowed for rapid technological growth and was likely a necessary evil to becoming a real superpower. The downside is that it created billionaires, and they have no place in a communist society in my opinion. I really hope China will eventually require all businesses to be cooperatively owned and proceed to eliminate the billionaire class.
As a side note, it’s also really unfortunate that the Soviet Union moving to do market reforms caused a break with China. Imagine the world today if China and USSR stayed on good terms at the time.
I think it’s a difference of power. In the US it’s the rich that hold the power. In china it’s the political elite. Allowing a disruptor to be killed is not justice, it’s just another form of power play.
In China its the communist party, which has 90 million members. That means almost everyone in China knows a party member personally. How many members does the governing party in your country have?
What is this in reference to and what is your argument?
I was highlighting the difference in power politics. In my country the rich (powerful) use the police to destroy data and raid homes if it looks like someone might disrupt their bottom line. In china it is the same, but something that would be inconceivable here (arresting the rich) is possible because the power dynamics are different.
I am not discussing which is a better system; though I do have a strong opinion on that.
China is probably the only country in the world that executes death sentences for corrupt billionaires. So I dont think capitalists would have any chance to take back power.
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/01/why-do-chinese-billionaires-keep-ending-up-in-prison/272633/
Yeah, the fact that the rich aren’t completely above the law means that the system is working right now. On the other hand, stuff like this makes me concerned that the rich are starting to undermine it https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/2173090/chinese-campus-crackdown-young-marxist-activists-expands-major
I dont know what that was about, but it stopped a while ago afaik. And I’m not sure what exactly they mean by calling them “Marxists”, considering that everyone in China studies Marx in school.
The story is from a couple of years ago, so maybe that stuff got addressed since. There is a difference between studying Marx in school, and actually applying what you study in everyday life. I grew up in the Soviet Union, and we studied Marx and Lenin as well, but most people didn’t really think about theory or its application all that much unfortunately. And that’s what allowed Gorbachev and Yeltsin to do what they did. Now that people got to enjoy capitalism for a few decades they’re realizing what they lost, but clawing that back isn’t going to be easy now that Russia’s run by an oligarchy.
I understand the wisdom behind Deng’s reforms. Allowing Western companies in allowed for rapid technological growth and was likely a necessary evil to becoming a real superpower. The downside is that it created billionaires, and they have no place in a communist society in my opinion. I really hope China will eventually require all businesses to be cooperatively owned and proceed to eliminate the billionaire class.
As a side note, it’s also really unfortunate that the Soviet Union moving to do market reforms caused a break with China. Imagine the world today if China and USSR stayed on good terms at the time.
I think it’s a difference of power. In the US it’s the rich that hold the power. In china it’s the political elite. Allowing a disruptor to be killed is not justice, it’s just another form of power play.
In China its the communist party, which has 90 million members. That means almost everyone in China knows a party member personally. How many members does the governing party in your country have?
What is this in reference to and what is your argument?
I was highlighting the difference in power politics. In my country the rich (powerful) use the police to destroy data and raid homes if it looks like someone might disrupt their bottom line. In china it is the same, but something that would be inconceivable here (arresting the rich) is possible because the power dynamics are different.
I am not discussing which is a better system; though I do have a strong opinion on that.