Hear me out on this. The very concept of Libre, in abstract and in software, includes the free ability to distribute, copy, modify, etc. This is true of Libre 3D models, FLOSS hardware, and the like. This implies that it’s only Libre if it’s also gratis, otherwise you create an economy of inequity, with one person paying for it, and the rest getting it from them for free.

It’s generally OK to charge someone for labor, but the FSF and GNU project actively encouraging users to sell Libre products at as high a markup as they can get away with (“Actually, we encourage people who redistribute free software to charge as much as they wish or can.” From the GNU project https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.en.html) is just shilling for capitalism in a broken world.

Obviously this is in the context of currency, the economies of effort, thought, and exchange are more complex.

  • Sagar Acharya
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I agree with you fully @daelphinux@lemmy.ml . Free Software is essentially incompatible with capitalism. I work as a dev at Hyperbola OS and I’ve raised this issue several times.

    Thank you for expressing this well.

    • Sagar Acharya
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      My solution to this issue is like this:

      1. Have an institution like FSF which sells binary with open source code (copyright still belongs to dev) till adequate cost is recovered. (Say first 1000 copies of software binary for $50). After selling 1000 copies, source code’s license would be changed to free say AGPLv3 and gradually, software price would come down till zero.
      2. Curtail the freedom of distributing copies. This would enable you to fiddle as much as you want on your computer but not distribute free copies.

      These solutions enable free software devs to survive in capitalistic world! They’re compatible with capitalism.

      • daelphinuxOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        The point is to make a system that’s better than capitalism… not reduce to that level. Because, what you just described sounds like shareware with extra steps.

        • Sagar Acharya
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          I’d love that. The issue is just that you might need to become one of the most powerful men in your country. It’s harder than above solution implementation. Much harder!

          In fact designing a system better than capitalism is hard too. I’ve dwelled much on this problem too.