🤦‍♂️Maybe first check the documentary before downvoting…

Check from 0:58:00 to hear about the patents created by NCI behind Burzynski’s back

in Holland we’ve seen environmental protests taking extreme forms while not being condemned as extreme. They’re being discussed as “people who have concerns” while other groups aren’t portrayed like that.

Also, a protester was invited to a popular mainstream talkshow and glued himself to the table (which was easily undone afterwards). Other protesting figures for other means, with a reasonable following, and never calling for arms (while being protrayed in msm to do just that), don’t even get a seat on that “talkshow”.

Also e.g. A protest organized by ‘extinction rebellion’ was able to seige a runway at an airport. imo, it’s unthinkable for a random group to do that unless there’s inside support. In my opionion millitary police would have intervened before they would be able to block the runway with those numbers.

In that case you should maybe start to be resilient and not be offended by some “censorship”.

what logic is that?

Also that’s the premier talking point always invoked by far right when their offensive lines are being moderated.

oh sure… now i’m suddenly far right. Forget what i said. Bye

What about, educating people to be resiliant? Because as i see it, with this trajectory, we’re raising people who will be offended by anything, and thus eventually censoring everything you can imagine.

You really think that’s a reason for censorship?!

Ps. they don’t owe christianity antything. Jesus died. not ‘christianity’.

for me it’s not about a pitty party. it’s about the censorship taking extreme forms

the link to the article https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(23)00262-3

How about an ASUS Mini PC PN51 with Ryzen 7 cpu, running Proxmox virtualizer?

if we talk UFO related phenomena, then aliens abduction experience research is included, no?

i guess D.C.G.C(and the C.B.D.C.) are incompatible with actual crypto. Any news on that front?

indeed.

i dont’ think i can find the source for this one, but; there was a group doing a questionaire under people who didn’t trust the media’s perception. The outcome surprised the group. it seemed that those people having work where they have much contact with people were better of during the pandemic health wise than those having a more secluding life. ofcourse the “more research is required” clause applies.

yeah, i conclued similar as what your article says about the writer of the link i provided;

“There is just no evidence that they make any difference,” the lead author said in a media interview. This brought an unusual chastisement from the Cochrane Library’s editor-in-chief, who stated it was “not an accurate representation of what the review found.”

if they can’t say with certainty that it does/doesnt’ work based on all the previous studies. i read it as; There’s no firm prove it works against resporatory virusses. That’s why i wouldn’t bet on it like my life depends on it.

Don’t immediately throw the ideology card please. Further down in ‘plain language’ they state;

We are uncertain whether wearing masks or N95/P2 respirators helps to slow the spread of respiratory viruses based on the studies we assessed.

Believe what you will. Cheers

Actually, it was talking about the studies it had available as sources. Bascially, garbage in garbage out. As i read it, they don’t disqualify their own used methods.

Hi. The article starts with a reference to a publication dated February 10, 2021

This publication dated Jan 2023 says masks were hardly effective [edit: they were unable to make firm conclusions either way]

Salut. Les articles partagent également qu’il y avait un décret national visant à tuer le loup. Les articles parlent des années 1500 et 1700, où vous receviez un bonus si vous le prouviez. L’article dit aussi qu’en raison d’une population moins nombreuse, ils ont vu plus d’animaux sauvages. URL ici : https://lemmy.staphup.nl/post/32 J’ai vérifié, dans les années 1700, il n’y avait en effet qu’environ 10 % de forêt. (google translated)

There was one based on 4Chan scoring better than ChatGPT on truthfulness :D https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efPrtcLdcdM

i’d expect them to also consider the effect of applied covid treatment(s), but i don’t read anything about that

j’ai plusieurs articles de journaux en néerlandais des années 1800 avertissant que le loup a tué des enfants de 3 et un de 15 ans. Pourquoi ne sommes-nous pas avertis des dangers.(google translated from english)

Je suppose que ce n’est pas un hasard si le loup étend également son territoire…🤔 (google translated from english)

Yeah, i also noticed that a ban is easily obtained(other community, other server). i wasn’t even aware of any damage done and i got a ban for ‘racism’ ?! Pretty frustrating when you receive a temporary site-ban for something you think is incorrectly asssesed.

• The W.H.O.( a UN body ) seeks to sidestep governments in case of emergency.
• The S.D.G.s ( UN initiative ) is re-organizing all connected countries under the guise of climate emergency.
• The “N.G.O.” W.E.F. (Sunak is connected, as are many PM’s) is all about S.D.G.'s

Could the U.N. be the driving force?

No, ofcourse i’m not ok with that.

But seems that wasn’t obvious from my comment. i don’t even want to explain my (not liberal) stance here, i don’t think there’s room for that here. seeing what happened before.

What do you think of a one-child policy?

i can attest that the prices are going up in Netherlands considerably. e.g. 2022 saw a 30% increase of people obtaining food from food-banks (ref)

imo, it’s all thanks to the Agenda2030( S.D.G. , U.N.) climate fanatics in the Dutch government. While mega-corporations have insane profit, we’re being told it’s the oil prices etc.

Also, during covid, govt also did a good job in ensuring nobody with good idea’s had entrance to them. e.g. air-filtration developers were set for testing etc, but govt had faked its interest.(2x 1st hand sources). Result: all went as govt pleased, causing much damage both to people and small businesses. i’m thoroughly convinced there’s blackmail of the worst kind involved.(e.g. dutch)

What’s that got to do with the ‘energy’ fragment, which is intended to give some insight in (not-so-often-seen genuine) weird stuff.

Regarding 9:00, he’s pretty arrogant about the organ harvesting part being nothing. This publication (2007) does give some proper thought https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1809171/

Thx. i wonder what their difference is between ‘aliens’ and ‘gods’ 🤔🤷‍♂️

Hearing him talk about ‘energy’ at 2:43, it’s obvious he’s not buying it. (not that my thinking agrees with everything Falun Dafa claims, but that aside)

For those interested; There’s a documentary called “Ring of Fire: An Indonesian Odyssey - Chapter 3 East of Krakatoa”. This is an excerpt about a humble man who baffles the team🧐 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqonp6VYuoE

i didn’t read such things in their 2 books. Who created this?

interesting. Where did you read that?

Depends who you ask.

i read the 2 books. Their teaching doesn’t point to a doom-event or something, but is about truth, forgiveness and perseverence (how i summarize it)

Some Falun sites with various info (which i haven’t all checked)

official stories

• http://auckland.china-consulate.gov.cn/eng/zt/flgzt/200909/t20090902_230538.htm
• http://bg.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zgzt/jpflg/
• (2007 pubmed) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1809171/

supporter sites

• https://faluninfo.net/
• https://en.falundafa.org/
• https://fofg.org/
• https://fofg-europe.org/
• https://www.fofg.club/contact
• https://sites.bu.edu/dafa/wiki/
• https://www.shenyun.org/news/view/article/e/owScIs8qYjc/what-is-falun-dafa-dyk.html?lang=en-us
• https://www.learnfalungong.com/
• https://en.faluninfo.eu/

Still, for me, those sort of tricks aren’t a mistake. There’s too much involved with politics.
Thanks for the extra insight though. Cheers

Actually, poll outcomes are very influential…

This compilation is making a mountain range out of a molehill.

Depends what you are willing to tolerate from ‘nonbiased media’ i guess

ahum… they didn’t just ignore him… They did all kind of tricks. (from 15:00 the media tricks are covered)

Thanks for the info.

It’s not about what you/i think of Ron Paul. If News & media pull those tricks as shown on us, then who are we kidding…
i’d like you to check out the video starting from 15:00. And tell me what you think of it

At least your first assumption( “Seems … a covid denier”) is false.

He is one of those scientists who was all for it, got the jab, promoting masks. The whole lot. Educating the masses with whatever FDA and WHO were putting out. When the publications started telling a different story than what we were told to believe he chose to follow the evidence… (around this time he changed his background poster) In one of his video’s he genuinely apologized for science missing the mark, and that thus he was misinforming the masses by it. His backdrop now says “follow the evidence…”. Also, If he would be a covid-quak, youtube would have censored him long ago by breaking youtube guidelines.

i wonder how many more people were downvoting(not saying it was you) without an idea what it’s about :/

thx