Good contents and ideas - which are actually implemented in Open Research Europe system. Minimal checks and balances, peer review as public comments after publication.
However I don’t fully agree that peer review as we have today is worse than nothing. I published a bit and reviewed a bit more. I have marked for rejection probably a third of published papers for basic methodology errors that fully invalidate results. Those papers would just add to the noise that already exists via thousands of papers published…
I was able to adjust my Vostok similarly, but in the end the real timekeeping on wrist was waaaay off. Plus it was quite unstable, ie. one day it would run +7s, another +17, etc. Pain in the butt to adjust.