The link goes to this users Mastodon post on the subject. I’m going to copy part of the text of his post without having to post the Threads post they were shown. Click through if you want to see for yourself, avoid if such things are upsetting to you.

“This was a post promoted to me from within Instagram to try and get me to use threads. Ill say that again: this is the promotional content shown to non-threads users as an inducement to join threads.”

If you do click through to the Mastodon thread, you’ll see several other people confirming they’ve seen the same or similar posts promoting Threads.

I’ve said the same thing in comments to other Threads related posts in this community but I’m going to say it again; didn’t we create and use fediverse software like Mastodon, Lemmy, PixelFed etc in large part to escape the constant hate-baiting and algorithmic manipulation of companies like Meta? Why are so many in the fediverse prepared to throw their fellow fediverse users under the bus by exposing them to a company and a set of users who not only say these things and not only allow them to be said but actually use them as a promotional tool to encourage more people onto Threads?

If Threads was a fediverse instance, it would’ve been defederated from by just about everyone by now. Why are some people bending over backwards to give Meta a free pass?

‘Wait and see’ I hear people say. I can already see.

  • HughJanus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    didn’t we create and use fediverse software like Mastodon, Lemmy, PixelFed etc in large part to escape the constant hate-baiting and algorithmic manipulation of companies like Meta?

    “We” created the Fedi to have interoperable systems and to give users autonomy over their accounts and their feeds. That’s why there’s an option for users to block other users and even entire servers.

    Why are so many in the fediverse prepared to throw their fellow fediverse users under the bus

    No one is doing that.

    If Threads was a fediverse instance, it would’ve been defederated from by just about everyone by now.

    True.

    Why are some people bending over backwards to give Meta a free pass?

    No one wants to give Meta a “free pass”. We want a way for Meta users to see that they can leave the platform, escape the ads and data-mining without losing access to their friends, family, news, etc. It’s specifically because Meta is so terrible that we want to federate.

    You see it as the Fediverse promoting Meta but we see the opposite.

    ‘Wait and see’ I hear people say

    I’ve literally never seen anyone say this except FediPacters as a strawman. No one needs to “wait and see”. We know exactly what we’re getting.

    • shrugal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve literally never seen anyone say this except FediPacters as a strawman.

      I’ve seen that quite a few times already, mostly in the form of “it’s stupid to preemptively defederate, we can always defederate later”.

    • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who exactly do you mean by “we.” I’m certainly not part of this ill-advised rush to welcome Facebook with open arms.