I only tried a tiling WM for a few days several years ago. I am ok using the terminal but not everything can be done easily there. In the screenshots of people setups, there are always fancy terminals. Are tiling WM good also for other GUI a part from terminals?

  • 柊 つかさ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    TWM resize your windows automatically as you create windows or move them around. This is the key: TWM’s work best with applications that work well in a variety of sizes. Usually this means text based applications: terminals, IDE’s, browsers, chat apps, etc. GIMP for example didn’t really work well for me unless I used it on its own workspace. It comes down to this: how much of the time do you use text based applications? For me, that’s almost always. I rarely touch something that is not a terminal or a browser. For you it might be different. Good luck.

  • Bob Smith@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 months ago

    I use a tiling WM for everything. Libreoffice, games, Firefox/Chromium, file managers, etc. It all works and it is a great way to handle multiple monitors.

  • k4j8@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    In the screenshots of people setups, there are always fancy terminals.

    Ha, they’re just showing off their hacker side for the screenshot, plus terminals resize nicely. Tiling window managers work well for most apps. The only GUI issues I’ve had are some pop-up windows being tiled instead of floating, but that’s an easy fix. They’re not for everyone, but they work great with GUI apps.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yup. Main issues I’ve had are GIMP (seriously, what’s with that floating toolbar) and weird pop-ups in browsers.

      I forget why I switched away from them because I was annoyed at games messing stuff up, but it really wasn’t that bad. I currently don’t use it because my kids use my computer and I’m not interested in teaching them my shortcuts.

  • cerement@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago
    • a big feature of tiling window managers is the auto-placement / auto-adjustment / auto-sizing of windows to fit available space
      • their main focus is always having everything visible (nothing hidden behind overlaps)
      • and most of them take advantage of having a good set of keybinds so everything can be keyboard driven rather than half-and-half with a mouse
    • before jumping feet first into tiling window managers, get an easy introduction with
      • Pop Shell – an extension that adds tiling features to Gnome
      • PaperWM adds linear tiling to Gnome
      • Material Shell – focusing on a more grid based workspace model
    • DistroTube argued that the killer feature of tiling window managers is the workspaces, not the tiling
    • check through the hotkeys of your current window manager – you won’t get the full dynamic features of a tiling window manager, but most of them have keys for snapping windows to top-half, bottom-half, left-half, right-half (as well as sometimes offering by quarter as well)
    • callyral [he/they]@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      DistroTube argued that the killer feature of tiling window managers is the workspaces, not the tiling

      non-tiling window managers can also have different workspaces, or even DEs such as KDE Plasma. IIRC even Windows has those (although with inconvenient keybindings imo)

      • wiikifox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think they’re talking about the tandem of tiling and workspaces, as usually you can customize your tiling per-workspace. Some TWMs have tags instead of workspaces, making it even better.

  • bulwark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    As someone who’s exclusively used tiling WM for the past few years you can do anything a full blown DE. I like them for a couple of reasons:

    1. they don’t come with any extra software that I will never use.
    2. They’re light weight with minimal overhead
    3. They are extremely customizable, key bindings are second nature for me know.

    I do use the terminal for a lot of things, but I also use the GUI for lots of stuff like web browsing, graphic editing, and gaming.

  • callyral [he/they]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes, I’m using swaywm right now and I’m typing this comment on Firefox.

    Although most (if not all) tiling window managers are configured with a text editor, not a settings program.

  • YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I use multiple GUIs with i3 and would not have it any other way. They work great and I can control them with the keyboard!

  • fckgwrhqq2yxrkt@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t have extensive experience, but I have been using the tiling in pop os consistently for a year and have really found it to improve my productivity and oganization on tasks I need many windows open for. Its not perfect and I’m starting to consider looking for options that give me more layout control, but was an excellent first option. It has a toggle right in the task bar to switch between windows or tiling, but once I spent an hour learning the keyboard shortcuts for the filing, the windows mode just feels so slow to set up good layouts in.

  • Tau@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I like to use qutebrowser for web browsimg, it allows to browse the web without leaving the keyboard

    • Neil
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Got any “must-know” keybindings you use? I’ve been using qute for years and still feel like I underutilize it.

  • bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    You might have some GUI nonsense happen, but for the most part you’ll be okay. I have exclusively used i3 for my Linux stuff over the past few years and have only run into a few problems with misc apps

  • technologicalcaveman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    It can be used for other stuff. I use dwm and find that on occasion some programs aren’t nice in dwm or don’t work well. So, i suggest having both a tiling and a floating.

    • wiikifox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      dwm has a tiling layout in any case, and most TWMs do too, so there’s no real reason to leave your TWM, even if you need/want foating windows.