- cross-posted to:
- rowerki@szmer.info
- cross-posted to:
- rowerki@szmer.info
“A cycle path built through part of Sydney’s inner west will be ripped up on Tuesday, five months after it was completed, due to a council decision described by riders as a knee-jerk reaction to complaints from residents.”
You must log in or # to comment.
@ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml I am absolutely furious that Canada Bay council is going ahead with this act of environmental and infrastructure vandalism.
If you’ve ever asked why Australia doesn’t have great quality cycling infrastructure or transport planning that reflects the realities of net zero by 2050, here’s a big part of the reason.
It’s car-brained local governments listening to NIMBYs.
"A cycle path built through part of Sydney’s inner west will be ripped up on Tuesday, five months after it was completed, due to a council decision described by riders as a knee-jerk reaction to complaints from residents.
“The separated bike path on Heath Street in the inner west suburb of Rodd Point is part of a planned $7 million cycleway designed to connect the Bay Run at Iron Cove on the banks of the Parramatta River to Concord.”
UPDATE: I did some more digging into the local council in Canada Bay, and found this about the mayor:
“The Independent Commission Against Corruption is currently investigating allegations Canada Bay’s long-term mayor Angelo Tsirekas accepted perks from developers, including international flights and accommodation, in return for favourable decisions.”
#cycling #bikes #bicycles #Sydney #NSW #CanadaBay #Politics #NSWPol #AusPol #News #Urbanism #UrbanPlanning #Bike #Walkable #Cities #NIMBY #Politics
Ping @SydneyCyclewaysFan @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews @betterstreetsnsw
@ajsadauskas@aus.social @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml @SydneyCyclewaysFan @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews @betterstreetsnsw
Design authority for cycling infrastructure needs to be taken away from councils.
No need for it to be politicised by grand-standing local demagogues running on a dog-whistle platform of “we hate cyclists getting in our way when we’re driving our SUVS on roads we pay for and they don’t”
I’m actually starting to think it WOULD be a good idea to get rid of local councils altogether. Nothing important would be lost.
Local councils are where we store mediocre politicians who are really trying to get a safe state or federal seat.
deleted by creator
@ukuku @ajsadauskas @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml It’s terrible and disappointing. But not without precedent! See: College Street. Interestingly in that case the council was the proponent of the bike lane and the State took it out.
@ukuku @ajsadauskas@aus.social @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml The Geelong council in Victoria tried to do the same thing but the state government intervened and stopped the vandalism.
The lowest class of politicians will politicise anything they can if it helps them dog-whistle and set segments of the public against each other. They love to create zero-sum culture war divisiveness in the community, rather than consensus. Distracts attention from their lack of vision and competence. If you can’t do anything good, then just encourage the already-entitled demographics to attack less-entitled demographics.
Democracy allows this to happen sometimes. If we don’t spend all our time preventing bad actors from taking over the system.
deleted by creator
@ukuku @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml @SydneyCyclewaysFan @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews @betterstreetsnsw Jake Coppinger @jakecoppinger has written a very detailed blog post about the decision by Canada Bay Council. The blog post is up here: https://jakecoppinger.com/2023/03/canada-bay-council-plans-to-remove-heath-st-cycleway-due-to-a-misleading-traffic-report/
Among other things, they hired a car-focused traffic engineering firm to do an “independent” report.
After Jake and others pointed out the major errors in that report, Canada Bay City Council pulled it from their website, and updated their website from saying cycle lane removal to cycle lane “modification”.
The council has requested feedback about the proposal:
“To submit your feedback online please fill in the form below. Alternatively, you can also provide feedback via email through council@canadabay.nsw.gov.au or by mail to Locked Bag 1470 Drummoyne NSW 1470.”
I suggest we take them up on their request, and provide them with feedback.
deleted by creator
@ajsadauskas @ukuku @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml @jakecoppinger @SydneyCyclewaysFan @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews
Consider my feedback emailed!
@jedsetter @ukuku @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml @jakecoppinger @SydneyCyclewaysFan @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews I’ve just sent them a letter as well. The address is council@canadabay.nsw.gov.au.
To all whom this may concern at Canada Bay Council,
I just wanted to reach out about your council’s shameful, disgraceful decision to remove the barrier-protected bike lanes along Heath Street, in favour of two additional on-street parking spots.
As you are no doubt aware, your council has rightly been condemned in the media, including in The Sydney Morning Herald over the Easter long weekend, for this reckless act of car-brained infrastructure vandalism: https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/knee-jerk-reaction-sydney-cycle-path-to-be-ripped-up-months-after-opening-20230406-p5cym2.html
You have completely ignored the views of the community and local residents in this decision, as well as the broader community across Western Sydney.
Here are just some of the quotes from residents in that SMH article:
“They just decided they wanted to get rid of it. They’re just focusing on the people who don’t want it − it is a real NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) exercise where they got the council on to support them. They have used state money to do it, and now they want to rip it up.”
“A lot of people don’t ride bikes because of speeding cars. Removing the cycleway and just replacing it with a few logos on the road is just going to discourage people who were looking for a safer option. It is a retrograde step.”
(1/4)
@jedsetter @ukuku @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml @jakecoppinger @SydneyCyclewaysFan @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews It is incredibly telling that the council has pulled the traffic report from its website, as well as modified the language on its website to say it is “modifying” rather than “removing” the cycle lane: https://jakecoppinger.com/2023/03/canada-bay-council-plans-to-remove-heath-st-cycleway-due-to-a-misleading-traffic-report/
This cynical dishonesty from Council would frankly not be necessary if this were a good decision that was supported widely by the community.
The decision to remove the protected lane in favour of restoring two parking spaces is disastrous for a number of reasons:
-
It shows an absolute and utter contempt to both local residents and taxpayers across the state, whose $7 million funded this protected bike lane.
-
Removing the protected bike lane substantially increases the risk of serious injury and death for cyclists commuting along this stretch. Council has blood on its hands for anyone killed or injured as a result of this reckless and stupid decision.
-
This decision will encourage more people to drive to work, rather than cycle, using the already congested streets of Sydney’s inner west.
-
More people driving rather than cycling means more traffic congestion across the Inner West. This additional congestion doesn’t just affect people in the Canada Bay LGA, but across the entirety of Western Sydney.
(2/4)
@jedsetter @ukuku @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml @jakecoppinger @SydneyCyclewaysFan @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews 5) It has been shown, time and time again, that increasing road capacity does not decrease traffic, but instead encourages more people to drive. This well-documented phenomena is known as induced demand.
The solution to traffic problems across Inner Western Sydney is to provide alternatives to driving, which is an incredibly inefficient use of road space. That is achieved by rolling out *more* protected bike lanes, not bulldozing the ones you have.
On a separate but related note, I understand that Mayor Angelo Tsirekas has already faced an ICAC investigation for his alleged corruption: https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/i-m-sounding-a-bit-like-a-liberal-councils-pursue-massive-cash-grab-20220822-p5bbpc.html
“The Independent Commission Against Corruption is currently investigating allegations Canada Bay’s long-term mayor Angelo Tsirekas accepted perks from developers, including international flights and accommodation, in return for favourable decisions. He vowed to fight the allegations.”
Given these already serious allegations, I suggest that it’s not a great look for Mayor Tsirekas to engage in acts of car-centric infrastructure vandalism that ignore the will of the community in order to create two additional on-street parking spaces for nearby developments.
(3/4)
@jedsetter @ukuku @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml @jakecoppinger @SydneyCyclewaysFan @cyclingnews @walk_sydney @sydneyurbanismnews Rather than dramatically increasing traffic across the inner west, with the additional pollution this will create across Western Sydney, and increasing the risks of deaths and injuries, the council should instead seriously reconsider whether the nearby developments really need the two additional on-street parking spaces.
I strongly urge you to do the right thing and actually listen to the community on this one, and retain the protected bike lane on Heath Street.
Kindest regards,
AJ Sadauskas.
(4/4)
-
@quoll Yes, these Canada Bay Council morons think cyclists will be safer battling car traffic than in a dedicated bike lane. They think the streets will be safer if more people drive, rather than cycle.
@ajsadauskas What?! 🤦♂️
@andrewfeeney IKR!
They’re removing a barrier-protected bike lane and are replacing it with *TWO* parking spaces.
They will also paint “additional bike logos” on the road “to alert drivers to watch for cyclists riding on-road”.
They claim that will make the road safer than a barrier-protected bike lane.
They’ve also asked for the public to send them feedback at council@canadabay.nsw.gov.au.
the anglosphere can just be considered lost at this point tbh 🤷♀️
@k_o_t @ajsadauskas@lemmy.ml It really is difficult to overstate just how backwards this decision is.
A lot of the problem is that many local councils outsource these decisions to external contractors and consultants who don’t have a lot of expertise in barrier-protected bike lanes and modern Urbanism.
These contractors pretend that induced demand doesn’t exist, they look at moving cars rather than moving people, and give really awful advice. That seems to be what’s happened here.
So even where you have good barrier-protected cycling infrastructure in place, as you have here, as soon as a couple of NIMBYs complain that they want more on-street parking, it ends up getting bulldozed.
It’s backwards, car-brained thinking of the worst kind.
It truly is time to make a choice: the NIMBYs or the planet.
The comments in that article were quite the rollercoaster. My favorites were the people saying they never see anyone biking in their neighborhood and one guy saying that they should rip it out because there are more cars than bikes 🧠🧠
That’s carbrain-ism for you. “I never see anyone using it” well that’s because bicycles on bike paths are a much more efficient way of moving lots of people than cars are.
