Fediverse hot takes:
-
The only true client is the browser.
-
Microblogging be damned.
-
it’s the instances/servers that are federated, not the users (ie us) … and damn that too.
Fediverse hot takes:
The only true client is the browser.
Microblogging be damned.
it’s the instances/servers that are federated, not the users (ie us) … and damn that too.
@fediverse
“correct”/good and to simply “join” a foreign place and obey its customs.
Instead, they should have been given their own “place” (a soft Mastodon fork and separate instances) to grow, call and have a culture of their own.
If new platforms eat the fediverse’s lunch (eg BlueSky), it will be by providing this experience.
@maegul@hachyderm.io @fediverse@lemmy.ml
It was such a missed opportunity when the first twitter exodus happened. Makes me sad when I see accounts here I want to follow but that have been inactive since then and are now fully back on twitter.
I also think it’s pretty selfish to demand that everyone in the Fediverse has to obey your norms and values. If you don’t like someone you can defederate/block, but I don’t have a button that makes the people I’m interested in appear here.
@wenzel @maegul@hachyderm.io @fediverse@lemmy.ml
Huh … you dug up some of my older posts on my main account (😊).
Just to clarify, it’s in a series of running “hot takes” I post mostly for myself as a record of my thoughts as I experience the fediverse. I’m not necessarily convinced that they’re true, but when I write them they feel like that they’re true enough to be valuable even in the arguments that they prompt.
Also … calckey meet lemmy … this thread is all under a lemmy post in the “fediverse” community on lemmy.ml
@maegul @maegul@hachyderm.io @fediverse@lemmy.ml Didn’t check the dates but those are timeless insights anyway :)
@wenzel @maegul@hachyderm.io @fediverse@lemmy.ml
Well, everytime I see someone get a kick out of all that calckey has to offer, I think back to my hot take 4, which I wrote before I really knew about the UI/UX of the *key platforms, and which says basically that the fediverse should be full of things like calckey.
@fediverse
7) In the aggregate, #Mastodon / #fediverse are simply unintuitive.
Add up all of the design missteps or confusions (which happen), mixed and confusing but often strongly felt cultural standards, lacking or hard-to-find documentation or explanations, and, federation strangeness/quirkiness … and you get a platform that crosses past the reasonably intuitive line.
It’s reparable, but probably not easily so.
@fediverse
8) The ideal fediverse is (?):
The flaw of the #fediverse is that it conflates hosting and community services (ie, 1 & 2) and so underperforms at both.
@fediverse
9) Like #Twitter and #BlueSky, the fediverse also likely has had its well poisoned … by “tech libertarianism”.
Twitter: “Nazi bar”, BlueSky: “Crypto scam”. Fediverse: “tech libertarianism fanatics”.
You may disagree, but others, perhaps many (?) see it that way and feel that the virtues of a properly designed and managed centralised social media are superior to chaotic volunteer-run decentralisation.
Maybe we should be forced to “work it all out together in the public square”?
@fediverse
@maegul @fediverse what is an example of platforms as communities? I’ve been struggling to find one as a single-user instance
@redscroll_py @fediverse I don’t know of any. I was proposing what I’d prefer the fediverse were made of.
Have you ever used Facebook? That is unintuitive. Twitter as well, most of the big platforms are.