• Nath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Australian Sushi is cultural appropriation, I’d love to hear this person justify “New York Pizza”.

    New York Pizza is famous globally and recognised as something different to Italian style Pizza. Is that also cultural appropriation?

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      culture is a thing that evolves over time and place, it shouldn’t have to be preserved in the “correct” version if the origin is acknowledged.

      these things exist outside of western culture too. I’d be surprised if all the types of dumplings weren’t derivatives of each other.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The deep pan type of pizza, where it’s more of a cheese pie than a flat pizza.

        • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s Chicago deep dish. New York pizza is what we get here. The crust is thicker than Italian and is loaded with more toppings.

          • tacosplease@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            New York pizza is an extra large pizza with big, floppy, greasy slices.

            As others have said. You were describing Chicago pizza.

          • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            New York pizza is what we get here.

            I dunno, I think it’s a pretty even split between NY and Italian these days, at least in Melbourne anyway.

            Source: Stretched a lotta dough at a bunch of places back in the day.

          • Thisfox@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Having been to new york, the new york pizza is a piece of burnt corrugated cardboard pita bread spread with grease and thin red paper near-meat circles. It is not really all that edible. It is not similar to pizza here in Australia.

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh boy! That’s a whole different can of worms:
        isn’t it curious how similar pizza is to Middle Eastern flat breads with toppings? And how Italians invented spaghetti shortly after Marco Polo returned from China where he would have been exposed to noodle dishes?

  • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you ever eat sushi with salmon, that’s a Norwegian “invention” that was made to sell more fish Japan. No country “owns” a dish.

    • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think we can all agree as a society that as far as cultural sensitivity goes, food is off limits. You eat what you want how you want it and no one has the right to stop you. Yes they are allowed to think gross or no way I’d never eat that but there should also be respect for each other as individuals with different preferences. Personally I take the same view with sexuality and kinks, I don’t have to like it and I’m allowed to be grossed out a bit but at the end of the day people do what makes them happy and they’re no less caring, funny or thoughtful than the next person.

  • sil@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    TIL Australian Sushi is a thing! It never occurred to me that they don’t have the easy to hold rolls in other parts of the world. I think they make up like 10% of my diet haha.

    • Baku@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      TIL too… I’m still not sure I understand what non Australian sushi is though. I just figured ‘authentic’ sushi would be what we have but with higher quality ingredients or potentially cut into slices to be easier to eat with chopsticks

      • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sushi more refers to the vinegared rice in the dish. What we have here in Australia is actually made in Japan, but only really popular in certain parts of the country at certain festivals etc. They do make handrolls, but as you suggested, they are cut into pieces.

  • WaterWaiver@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely gorgeous article.

    I had no idea our sushi rolls and banh mi were so divergent. How long until “Australian Banh Mi” is a thing overseas?

    • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      The wonderful thing about food is that it’s always changing. People shit on stuff for not being “authentic” but frankly I think it’s delightful how different traditions come together to play. Mixing and matching until the local food reflects the available ingredients and preferences of the populous.

      I mean I make a mean lemon tofu which is a derivative of lemon chicken which is a derivative of a Cantonese style that was adapted for churning out cheap and appealing food so migrants could work at takeaway stores and get visas.

      Food tells a story, wherever you have it and however you have it. Appreciating that is imho the more joyful approach than trying to fix it in time.

  • tacosplease@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is nonsense. Burgers are sold in damn near every country. The US is full of Americanized taco places and tex mex restaurants. We have “Chinese food” buffets that stock American versions of Chinese foods. We eat Pad Thai thinking it’s a popular Thai dish when really it’s just something they thought Americans would like. US has pubs that serve “fish and chips”. There are French restaurants, Mongolian restaurants, Afghani restaurants… McDonald’s sells spaghetti in Vietnam.

    We all eat each other’s foods. What is different about Australians having their own version of sushi? This seems entirely unremarkable.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For a lot of the things you mention, one of the distinctions is that many of the foods were created by said ethicity, but adapted the cooking techniques and ingredients to the local pallet.

      Edit: im not defending either side (i believe the chef is of japanese origin) its just there is a distinction between adapted foods and ones that arent.

    • Fleur__@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think there is an argument to be made for names being specific to products made in a certain place. The most prominent example I can think of is champagne being specific to the region in France. Lots of other alcohols, particularly spirits, such as Scotch and Irish whisky do this as well. I’m sure that most people don’t actually care but for specialist products selling to people who do care I think it makes sense to reserve the label and just call the local imitation something else.

    • rainynight65@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is nonsense. Burgers are sold in damn near every country.

      Except Americans will only call it a ‘burger’ if it’s a beef patty and garnish on a burger bun. What we call a chicken burger, they call a chicken sandwich - which is ludicrous because a sandwich is something between two slices of bread, not two halves of a bun. Heck, the even call Subway’s fare ‘sandwiches’.

      • crashfrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Technically “burger” is short for “Hamburg-style ground beef sandwich”

      • Faceman🇦🇺@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Round bun = Burger.

        Regardless of the patty.

        What’s crazy is americans will eat a vege burger, a mushroom burger, pork, lamb, turkey patties etc… all burgers. but as soon as you put fried chicken in it is suddenly becomes a sandwitch?

        • Urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know right?

          When I called my husband’s breakfast “grain stew” he got all precious about it. Apparently cooked oats in milk is called “oatmeal”, and I’m wrong, but it’s just stuff cooked in liquid? That’s stew.

          Why can’t people make up their minds?

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It must be ground, formed into a patty, grilled, and served on a bun. All those examples follow that formula, the protein itself is of secondary importance (although if no protein is specified then beef is assumed).

          A piece of fried chicken is not ground and formed into a patty, and thus cannot qualify.

        • rainynight65@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hey, I’m not American, and I never claimed they were rational or logical. It’s just funny that I’ve had this exact discussion only recently.

  • BluesF@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cultural appropriation is such a strange issue. It’s obvious to me that wearing someone’s culture as a costume is fucked up… And it’s pretty obvious too I think that opening a restaurant selling food from overseas is almost always cultural exchange… I don’t really think you can open a restaurant without a solid understanding of the food you’re making (quite unlike putting on a headdress and getting hammered on Halloween)… Somewhere in between there’s a line, perhaps, but I have absolutely no idea where it is. White people with dreads is in there somewhere, no one seems to agree on it, personally I think it’s pretty far removed from its origins and is basically a white hippy thing in it’s own right, regardless of how it began, but I know a lot of people disagree.

    • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a mexican, I dont mind people dressing as mexican for carneval, or making variations of mexican food, as long as they aren’t anti mexican, and I think that’s where the line is drawn. A culture dont get to “steal” other culture things and also not want them living with them.

      • BluesF@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s reasonable. I suppose there’s something distinct in the “costume” based on how significant the cultural garb is. I don’t know much about mexican culture so correct me if I’m wrong, but is the stereotypical sombrero/poncho combination more a product of convenience and weather than culture? Contrasting with the Native American headdress or Hindu bindi which are culturally significant in (I believe) a different way.

        • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do agree that the poncho and sombrero are not really a mexican cultural thing (although the shape and colors make it specific to mexico on top of drawing a (mexican) mustache). Like I said, I dont mind it, just don’t be anti mexican, and this applies to other cultures too.

      • BluesF@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a complex and multi-layered topic, as I alluded to in my previous comment, but I’ll do my best to answer this. I’m by no means an expert on this, and I’m a white English dude so far from qualified really… But I have read a lot on the topic in addition to my own gut reactions to these things.

        So… First let me clarify that by “wearing someone else’s culture as a costume” I am really talking specifically about people in wealthy Western countries wearing the cultural clothing of (almost always) historically colonised peoples from elsewhere. With that being said the first point to call attention to is a kind of dry economic one - the outfits you see being worn as a Halloween costumer are broadly mass produced by companies with no affiliation to the cultures they are imitating. They make huge amounts of money selling these costumes to Westerners like me, while giving nothing back to the people they’ve taken them from. This follows a long and difficult history especially in the context of colonies - historically (not at all that this doesn’t continue today) the West has plundered the world for all its worth, and this is just a relatively subtle modern example. So even before anyone puts the costume on I’m uneasy about it, personally.

        The second point is specific to certain cultural garbs which are ‘closed’ within the cultures they come from. While the other reply points out that they, as a Mexican, don’t mind seeing people dressed up in Mexican costume, you would be very hard pressed to find anyone Native American who is happy seeing anyone in a mass produced war bonnet. I won’t pretend to understand the full significance of the headdress, but its well known that it is not something you just ‘put on’ if you are a Native American, and divorcing it from that cultural context both cheapens it and shows a general lack of respect towards the people whose clothing you’re wearing.

        I think that lack of respect is really the main part of my problem with costume-ising culturally significant clothing. Obviously there are clothes from all over the world which are just clothes, and quite likely the people who make those clothes would be delighted to see them being worn all over the world! But if you don’t give enough of a shit to a) learn about the culture they come from and what the significance is and b) buy them from the actual people who created them, then you lose that connection and it ceases to be cultural exchange and becomes instead appropriation.

        • imalemmy@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          you would be very hard pressed to find anyone Native American who is happy seeing anyone in a mass produced war bonnet.

          I’d argue this is the exception, especially due to the history specific to the location where this kind of costume is common. Admittedly I come from a mixed East Asian background so my bias is based on people calling out appropriation for ao dais and kimonos and the like.

          To me it seems like you’re misattributing your reaction to those wearing the costume. I disagree that a person wearing a costume has the onus to research its history. That should be on the producer/retailer.

          I also disagree that a consumer should buy from the source. It’s a lot of effort and responsibility you’re placing on someone that likely has no intent for offense, when it’s simply easier and more reasonable to understand the context of the wearer and realise it’s not really an issue.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because without living the culture, you will not get the nuance no matter how much you try.

        Cultures are complex.

  • The way people use words online is so debate brained. Cultural appropriation isn’t inherently bad. It’s just a thing that exists and holds connotations about an imbalance of exchange. Is aussie style sushi not still considered Japanese food? Like, we have california rolls, but no one says they’re eating Californian food while eating sushi.

  • Egh, I could live with that…

    I just wanna eat my Philadelphia rolls with Norwegian salmon in peace… plus, I don’t think cultural appropriation, in this context, is necessarily malicious or so, now that I’ve read the article…

    grillman

    • Nath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. That photo misses the whole point. The article is talking about these, which are common in Australia. You normally buy 3-4 of them and that’s a quick lunch on the go.

      • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        dude that’s just sushi

        this is the biggest reach I’ve seen since…well a bunch of mayo criminals reached australia

        this entire thing just feels like settlers being butthurt that they a) have none of the history/tradition of the old world and b) unlike america, don’t even have any recently found pop culture relevance to offset the former

        There’s plenty of Aboriginal and even some trivial white Australian culture, claiming a certain shape of sushi is not that (not even Americans do this, and the few that do “Detroit pizza” are rightfully made fun of and bullied)

        Australian sushi is a thick hand roll made from half a standard sheet of nori. Its shape is distinct from Japanese temaki hand rolls, which are often cone-shaped, as well as from futomaki thick rolls, which are similar in shape but usually served sliced.

        so it’s literally just unsliced sushi lol. It’s not even like some characteristic ingredient, like with California Rolls and Philadelphia rolls using avocado/cream cheese (which are def not Japanese)

        • Nath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          dude that’s just sushi

          And that’s literally what we call it (or “hand rolls”). Until this article, I’ve never seen the term “Australian Sushi”. I can see how you’d market it that way in New York though, to make them novel/stand out.

          The guy writing the article is moderately famous in Australia as a Japanese-Australian TV personality.

            • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think I remember Nina Oyama saying something similar, but in a “hey this is amusingly uniquely Australian, I’m Japanese and have been to America” not “this is cultural appropriation” way.

          • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            there’s a type of brainworm unique to many anglos where they have to be as special and different as possible when there’s LITERALLY NOTHING THERE

            "hmmm…I could try learning about or even promoting idk one of the cultures of Africa or India or China (or indigenous Australian, American etc cultures) with thousands of years of tradition that literally nobody outside of those continents even knows exists, but nah I’m going to take sushi and call it Australian because I’m a special snowflake and I’m jealous that the other anglo settlers across the pacific have more clout "

  • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Either way, the Japanese deserve to have their culture appropriated so this is great.

    I choose to believe, despite having read the article, that Australian sushi is just a bunch of still-living extremely poisonous animals served alongside a beer.