The Bell Curve
I would like to never hear about The Bell Curve ever again.Contact: Section time codes:...

I’m not as fascinated by ideas of innate intelligence as a lot of techie people seem to be. I also hold values of equality and human dignity somewhat more strongly than the “fairness” invoked by e.g. opponents of affirmative action–so even if a lot of the “general intelligence is meaningful, measurable, and genetically determined” stuff were to be shown true, it wouldn’t change my political commitments.

So even though it wouldn’t really matter, I recalled hearing that the science in this book was sketchy somehow, and that was about it.

Hoo boy.

This video patiently explains:

  • just how much begging the question hides within both the concepts and the modes of analysis invoked by the authors
  • the intellectual dishonesty evident in the misrepresentation of cited studies
  • heritability doesn’t mean what the authors have come to say it means, nor what you probably think it means
  • the connections between Nazi-era eugenics and the research the authors cite being not (just) a matter of shared ideology, but actual follow-the-money material support from their institutions

Overall, I would highly recommend checking it out, because the influence of this work and its weird little online devotees has been such that even if you know you are 100% opposed to its political conclusions, you may have unknowingly absorbed some of its false premises.

A video by David Pakman about the same subject - race and IQ - is also good, even though it isn’t a similar “video essay”.


I’ll check it out – love to see a list of sources like that in the description!

Neat vids from youtube or wherever. Rules later

  • 0 users online
  • 1 user / day
  • 3 users / week
  • 16 users / month
  • 77 users / 6 months
  • 799 subscribers
  • 916 Posts
  • Modlog