I use KDE. Some use GNOME. Most other options are probably to be left out as X11 is unsafe.

Cosmic is not nearly finished, but will probably be a bit safer, as its in rust, even though not tested.

Then there are window managers like Sway, Hyprland, waymonad, wayfire, etc.

RaspberryPi also has their own Wayland Desktop.

Is every Wayland Desktop / WM equally safe, what are other variables here like language, features, control over permissions, etc?

  • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
    11·
    1 year ago

    I’m starting to think people misunderstand what an “immutable” distro really does…

    • jman6495
      2·
      1 year ago

      Please do share with me what I do not understand.

      A mostly read only filesystem built from a limited number of packages, with other files being in a fixed number of locations mean it is harder for malware to hide.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
        11·
        1 year ago

        You can achieve the exact same thing with a normal distro if you mount /var and /boot separately of /. And if you get a root exploit it’s just as harmful on either approach.

        “Immutable” systems are meant for maintainer comfort not for user security.

        • jman6495
          1·
          1 year ago

          No, you can’t : in an immutable distro I can reasonably trace almost any file in the filesystem back to the package that created it, and know with a reasonable degree of certainty that the installed version of said file has not been tampered with. That isn’t possible an a normal distro.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nlEnglish
            11·
            1 year ago

            Sure it is, has been for decades. You can use a read-only root partition, there are many tools to ensure the integrity of everything on it, and tracing files back to their package is a very old feature.