• queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      When that mass shooter was in Uvalde they should have droned the school.

      • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        8 months ago

        Better analogy would be the killer in uvalde using a kid as a human shield while also shooting into the other classrooms trying to kill other kids.

        Do you shoot back or do you sit around like the cops did and wait till the killer gets bored, runs out of ammo, or runs out of victims.

        Just look up how many thousands of rockets and mortars Hamas has launched at seemingly random targets in Israel since October 7th.

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Better analogy would be the killer in uvalde using a kid as a human shield while also shooting into the other classrooms trying to kill other kids.

          Sure, and then you bomb the school to kill them all. Also bomb all the surrounding buildings just in case.

          • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Look, we all know that if Israel wanted to kill two million people in Gaza, no one in the world could stop them. Not saying it’s okay that even 0.5% have been killed because that is still a horrifying number. But the idea that they are indiscriminately blowing up every single building is just theatre of the absurd.

            • SlikPikker@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The arrogance is amazing.

              That tiny country could be destroyed by a brisk wind and two battles with bad luck.

        • Masterchief117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          The “rockets” you’re referencing aren’t the threat you’re trying to invoke. How many Israelis have been killed by Hamas rockets ever much less since October 7th? Maybe if Israel didn’t have a concentration camp outside of their city walls they wouldn’t have to worry about the threat of retribution?

          Better analogy is the Uvalde shooter also starved and killed kids in the school for generations. Then some of the starving children started throwing sharpened pencils.

            • cecinestpasunbot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              7 months ago

              Answer the question. How many Israeli’s have died since October 7th from rocket attacks? Making unsubstantiated claims to show how dangerous the rockets are isn’t evidence of anything.

              • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                The claims are substantiated. See the link in my response.

                The weapon was a misfired Hamas rocket.

                The 100+ victims were Palestinians who were at the hospital (parking lot I believe?)

                Those same rockets are being fired into Israel (Nearly or over) 10,000 since the conflict began.

                Hamas isn’t trying to tickle Israelis with those rockets. See the effect one of those rockets has when they hit a populated area.

                • cecinestpasunbot
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  If you want to be taken seriously answer the question. Why is that so hard?

        • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Just look up how many hundreds of thousands of Palestinians Israel has killed in the last 30 years. Israel is the bad guy here, it’s not debatable.

          • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            the bad guy

            Why does there have to be a singular “the” bad guy?

            And why the need to lump a huge group together to lay that blame?

            The Israeli government and Hamas both share the blame for all of this, among others.

            As is too common in the world, while a relatively small group deserves the blame, many more, on both sides, suffer the consequences.

            • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              8 months ago

              Because one side is attempting genocide. That makes them the bad guy, regardless of whatever they claim Hamas did to them. Claiming Hamas is as bad as the Israeli government is the same as claiming the Jews were equally at fault with the Nazis.

              • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                Are you aware that Hamas’s charter has the explicit objective of the complete eradication of the Israeli state? The PLO is also not very different in this aspect. So where do you get this “one side is attempting genocide” talking point from?

                • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yeah, groups tend to want an end to the group genociding them. I get it from the actual facts, such as the 10 to 1 discrepancy in palestinian deaths vs Israeli.

                • cecinestpasunbot
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  That’s such a disingenuous comparison. The end of the Israeli state means an end to the apartheid system upon which the state is built. It does not mean the genocide of Israeli civilians. Claiming otherwise is just propaganda meant to justify Israel’s own campaign of ethnic cleansing.

                • cecinestpasunbot
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Where have they ever claimed to want to genocide Israeli people? That’s just a lie Zionist use to justify their own atrocities. It has no basis in fact.

          • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            No but you see, if you’re homeless and the authorities tell you to take shelter in my house, and then you start killing my family members to try and take over the house… if I defend my house… I’m the bad guy bc you where homeless before.

        • Prunebutt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Just look up how many thousands of rockets and mortars Hamas has launched at seemingly random targets in Israel since October 7th.

          Now, if only both parties would just cease firing for a moment. Has anyone thought of that? And if: has any governmet refused to offer/accept such ceasing of firing? /s

          • Rakonat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            If you think you can get Hamas, an organization who states goal is to kill every Israeli, to agree to an abide by a cease fire, go for it. Their current track record speaks volumes to the contrary

            • bufalo1973
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah, it’s a better idea give Hamas new recluits /s

            • Prunebutt@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago
              1. Good job dehumanizing “the enemy”. That way, you can legitimize any war crime. If you think that Hamas is such a non-human entity, why are the hostages not already considered dead?

              an organization who states goal is to kill every Israeli

              [Citation needed]

              To be clear: I’m definetly not rooting for the authoritarian regime of Hamas. Their leaders should drown in the blood they spilled.

  • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yeah no, the person behind the human shield wants to kill you and your family and is actively trying to accomplish said goal.

    • hh93@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah it’s pretty much the equivalent of the trolley-problem in real life.

      The question is how many casualties are “valid” before the cost is too high - and that’s just a morally impossible choice to make prefectly

      People that pretend it’s a black and white question and that either pretend the IDF is 100% wrong or the IDF is 100% right are just ignoring one side if the issue completely.

      In general I’d say the IDF is more often right than wrong in this conflict but they obviously fucked up, too - but at least for them it’s not the intention to cill civilians other than for the people they try to actually get to

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Shooting hellfire missiles at crowds from helicopters, just a regular Thursday oopsie daisy.

    • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      The people killing human shields are just as shitty as the people using human shields. Both are terrorists.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Would be the best for the first asshole not to take human shields to begin with.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m sorry I can’t hear you over a settlement being bulldozed. Wait a second for the bulldozers to stop.

          Oh silly me…they don’t stop.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                Friend, I’masking you because I was baffled what your comment had to do with anything. I still am. Could you explain the relevancy?

            • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              I mean we’re in a situation where civilians are being used as human shields. It would be nice if we weren’t, but that’s not what’s happening.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                8 months ago

                I mean we’re in a situation where civilians are being used as human shields

                Because Hamas took human shields. They could have not taken them. But yes, it happened and it’s not like it can be taken back now.

      • Infinitus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Can we stop using the word terrorist for something that it obviously not terrorism? Terrorist use terrorism to strike fear into the population of a more powerful state and hope for and overreaction that would play into their cards. I can only see one terrorist organization here. But, the IDF is that overreacting oppenent.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      8 months ago

      And so you’re justified in killing an unlimited amount of children to get to them.

          • Guydht@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            By what statement? By what action? “Unlimited amount” would be to not alert ahead of an attack on northern Gaza and catch Hamas commanders unguarded while destroying buildings with people still in them. What they did is provide a notice weeks ahead of the invasion of “we’re gonna invade you, run”. That’s literally the best thing they could’ve done in that situation humanitarianly, and the most ridiculous thing to do militarily.

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              Israel has stopped warning people. No text messages and no calls (not that there’s power to receive them) and no roof knocking.

              They’re bombing the safe zones. They’re bombing the evacuation routes. They’re bombing UN schools and shelters. More children are dying per day in this conflict than any conflict in recent history. Thousands and thousands of children are dead or buried under rubble.

              Stop defending genocide. You are on the wrong side of history and we will remember.

              • Guydht@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                “You warned everyone weeks ahead but you stopped doing so now so you’re wrong”?!?!?!?!?

                Are you serious? What more do you want from them? They did everything they could to alert everyone in Gaza that they were coming and the need to evacuate.

                They’re making their own safe routes, transferring thousands of civilians through them. You really can’t expect more from an army, when its purpose is killing its enemies. Looks like they waste lots of time doing non-killing.

                And the number of victims is terrible, but it’s the price of war, and it looks like the Palestinian leaders are more than happy to accept those numbers. War is a 2 sided thing, and you only blame one - and the one which is doing literally all it can to prevent needless death. While the other side, which you think is just, is parading dead bodies and advocating for true genocide “from the river to the sea”. What peace can there be with that kind of leadership.

                History will remember this war like they remember WW2. Did Britain kill civilian germans? Lots. The number of german killed vs the number of British killed is humongous. Are they remembered as “merciless killers”? No. Because they were fighting objective evil.

                So is Israel.

                • queermunist she/her
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  They’re bombing the safe zones you lying shit. No where is safe. The goal is to make Gaza uninhabitable so they are forced to flee the country and then Israel can annex the strip and make it part of Israel proper. Multiple politicians and government agencies have openly said this!

                  Ethnic cleansing through mass killing. Genocide.

                  Also? A multiethnic democracy, a free Palestine, from the river to the sea is not genocide. Making Israeli Jews into Palestinians is not genocide. Hamas wants to destroy Israel, which is a settler colony made from a British imperial mandate and it doesn’t have a right to exist.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Saying things like “worse” is just picking sides for no reason.

    There’s a point where you can stop measuring the cuntiness and just accept that they’re both well over the threshold of being a cunt. There’s no limit to the size of the cunt bucket. There’s no queue to get in.

    They’re both cunts and the world (and especially all the civilians in the local vicinity) would be better off without them.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Criticize both is the only opinion I care reading these days. Anyone that says one side worse than other, immidiate disinterest from me. Correct opinion for me is everyone is an asshole.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Especially since there is no end to the actual conflict when there isn’t something done on both sides of the conflict.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      There absolutely are degrees. We decided to name it the “Holocaust” because what the Nazis did was hella cunty.

      • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        There are degrees when it happens to you or something you like. There are simplifications when you don’t give much fuck about.

        • Most centrists I know, including me previously.
    • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      How many soldiers does it take to change a location to a military target?

      Is it a percentage? Is it their presence at all?

      Ok, does that apply to Israeli hospitals or public venues that had soldiers there as guards?

      If the attack on those venues is terrorism by virtue of the civilians there, but not a legitimate military strike despite the soldiers being there, then at the very least, bombing hospitals and refugee camps is terrorism too even if a few soldiers and weapons are found.

      Executing human shields is monstrous, and “look what you made me do” is the language of abusers.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        Someone using something as a human shield makes it into a human shield. Requires just one.

        How many soldiers does it take to change a location to a military target?

        Could be as few as one. Which is why there’s zero tolerance for using such locations.

        Ok, does that apply to Israeli hospitals or public venues that had soldiers there as guards?

        It’s the same rule for everyone.

        If the attack on those venues is terrorism by virtue of the civilians there, but not a legitimate military strike despite the soldiers being there, then at the very least, bombing hospitals and refugee camps is terrorism too even if a few soldiers and weapons are found.

        There’s two related issues. Killing civilians and using civilian cover to conduct warfare. Both are despicable.

        Executing human shields is monstrous, and “look what you made me do” is the language of abusers.

        Right, though I’d put more blame on those, you know, using human shields. They’re the ones putting the humans between you and your enemy to begin with.

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Given the demographics of those killed by Israel are squarely in line with the civilian population broadly (i.e. there’s no meaningful over-reprentation of Hamas, which we’d expect from purposeful targeted attacks against them), you’d apply your arguments consistently and defend Hamas attacking the IDF within Israel with similar civilian casualty rates (putting aside the whole national service, everyone is a combatant thing), right?

          …right?

          Thought not.

    • masquenox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      8 months ago

      Maybe Israel should stop using music festival attendees as “human shields…” that would be nice.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        If they were operating behind the music festival then absolutely. Nobody should be using human shields.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            I was wondering why a link to BBC News didn’t have HTTPS. Well…

            Last Updated: Friday, 23 April, 2004, 11:24 GMT 12:24 UK

            Of course this has nothing to do with the music festival in particular but I’m guessing your point is more that they’ve at least at some point used (or “faced claims” about using) huma shields? I would’ve imagined we’d much more recent cases to make that point though.

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          8 months ago

          The IDf operates behind every civilian in Israel - which means every civilian in Israel is a “human shield” for the Israeli state.

          While we’re at it, we might just as well declare every 9/11 victim a US “human shield,” too.

          • Syndic@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            While we’re at it, we might just as well declare every 9/11 victim a US “human shield,” too.

            Frankly, Bin Laden’s justification why killing US civilians was justified sounds very similar to justifications of hard line Israeli politicians why civilian getting killed in Gaza don’t deserve any sympathy and were “asking for it”. Both boil down to, “they voted for the people in charge who do crimes against us, so they are guilty as well.”

            • masquenox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s amazing how quickly contrived propaganda terms like “human shields” loses any meaning when they are flipped around on people western media hasn’t marked for genocide, eh?

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            The IDf operates behind every civilian in Israel - which means every civilian in Israel is a “human shield” for the Israeli state.

            That’s an interesting take on it. I don’t think that’s how the idea of human shield is usually viewed. It’s usually more direct, operating from a place with civilians so you don’t get bombed or literally forcing someone to stand between you and your enemy or something.

            While we’re at it, we might just as well declare every 9/11 victim a US “human shield,” too.

            How exactly?

            • masquenox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s an interesting take on it. I don’t think that’s how the idea pure propaganda of human shield is usually viewed deployed for the consumption of Israeli-loving white supremacists.

              Fixed that for you.

                • masquenox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Again… if that is what Hamas has (supposedly) done, then there is no reason not to designate every civilian in Israel, the US or any NATO member state as “human shields” as well.

                  Pick your propaganda and stop being a hypocrite about it.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              8 months ago

              Because it’s just as disingenuous and disgusting to imply as what you’re implying.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’ll have to ask you to explain what you think I’m implying. You might’ve misunderstood me, since I don’t think I’ve said anything that could be taken for “disingenuous and disgusting”.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    the extremely flawed and utterly repugnant lack of “logic” is that,
    “if using human shields works as a strategy, they will do it more often”.
    “conversely, if we prove to them that using human shields is ineffective, they will stop doing it”

    fucking. nauseating.

    • blueeggsandyam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I would be more willing to believe this logic if they had more proof that one, Hamas was doing this in all instances that the IDF killed civilians and two that killing Hamas through human shields was working as a way to prevent this in the future. As of now it doesn’t seem to be stopping them according to IDF so I don’t think it is valid to use that logic.

      It would also help if Israel’s leadership would stop comparing Palestinians to animals and stop stealing their land. It sure feels like an excuse to justify exterminating all Palestinians

    • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      You’d think people would learn that’s not the case after years of Hamas using human shields despite Israel proving they’ll bomb a place regardless. Even if it were true by some metric, how in the fuck is the number of casualties incurred by Israel’s policy of ignoring hostages worth it? In the days since October 7th, thousands of Palestinian civilians have been killed, including many in strikes on hospitals and refugee camps determined to house Hamas personnel. The policy is fucking monstrous and evidence shows it winds up in thousands of Palestinian deaths. Don’t tell me that those stolen lives somehow prevent even more civilian deaths unless you’ve got some very strong proof that this strategy has done anything to stop Hamas from hiding behind civilians, or that the thousands of civilians massacred are worth the chance to kill a few terrorists

      Edited for spelling

      • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        fucking thank you, yes, those are exactly the words i couldn’t find to express the sentiment i wish i could have stated

        furthermore “you made me do this” is ABUSER RHETORIC.

        as in, israel claiming that hamas “made them” slaughter civilians,

        likewise, urkaine “forced” russia to invade

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Who knew the Holocaust was just a preemptive strike. Hitler knew the Jews would do this to the Germans if they got power!

          /S

          • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Well if you wish to go there, there’s something to be said for how someone raised in violence can take away from their lived experience that “violence is how you raise people”, for instance how a big chunk of the baby boomer “sometimes children need to be smacked” generation did.

            Sadly often, abusers turn out to have learned how to abuse people from being abused themselves; hurt people hurt people.

            If someone stabbed you, though, I don’t think you’d feel mollified to learn that they themselves were victims of a stabbing themselves. The fact that they went through a trauma in the past does not give them free license to inflict that same trauma upon others.

            But in light of the fact that Israel does not represent all Semitic peoples, the state of Israel has even less excuse to exhibit–practically EMBODY–the pure hypocrisy.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s strange, how long does it take for IDF to realize that Hamas doesn’t give a shit about civilian lives. IDF killing the human shields changes nothing for Hamas.

      • Dubito_Cogito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        They sort of have, when the “human shield” is being talked about, it’s not literal kids being held up front… it’s people refrained from gunpoint from leaving the building that IDF warned they’ll shoot down soon. They give enough time to escape while monitoring the “people leaving” using drones. But not enough time is given to transfer “ammo and weapons”. Constantly monitored using drones.

        Human shields are the few people that are kept there at gunpoint, and there’s no way of knowing if there are civilians in the said building. As many people are seen escaping the building.

        A friend of mine who works for Battalion [redacted] told me a story the other day about an adult male (about 23) who managed to escape the building and ran towards the battalion posted close by. While he was running/escaping towards the IDF, he was being shot from the building. But he made it. I don’t know the location of the guy except he’s in Israel and chilling. But wants to stay undercover for now, hopefully the world will hear his story someday.

        IDF has a lot of proof, one I heard was that some of the gazans who died in the missile strike have “embedded” bullets from “Kalashnikova”… some Gazans know about this and they are afraid to speak out.

        Regardless, I have few Palestinians and Israeli friends. And all of them support Palestinians… and all the Israelis I know told me they would protest after the war to force the Israeli government to rebuild Gaza.

  • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Britain’s way of dealing with the IRA wasn’t killing Irish people by the hundreds while hoping that some of them might be terrorists. Spain’s way of dealing with ETA wasn’t killing Basque people by the hundreds while hoping that some of them might be terrorists.

    If you think that neither Britain or Spain would have been justified in brutalizing the Irish or Basque populations, but you think that Israel’s disregard for the lives of innocent Palestinians is justified, you’re just a racist tool.

      • 1371113@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Tool is slang for penis outside the US. Like Dick, Knob, Bellend. It’s why the band Tool have that penis shaped spanner on one of their album or EP covers.

    • Pipoca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Is it an unreasonable position that if the IRA launched an attack from a school, then a counterattack is justified even though it would have killed Irish kids, but that unprovoked attacks against Irish civilians would be unjustified?

      • Acters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        What are you on about, what are you asking? why are you asking it?

        This is false dichotomy because the intentions of the one using the human shield is known. On the other hand, the one who attacks the human shield needs plenty of context to determine his intentions, motives and decision making. They may not know the human shield is a human shield unless it is obvious or they are being alerted on the facts. Also, they may need to attack as there is clearly something off about the situation that they will fight to survive because there are times where you are at a disadvantage or terrible desicion making put you in a bad spot. Lastly human shields are not always tied up and may act independently enough that they are consciously accepting someone’s orders as a volunteer. There could be stray shots or the human shield intentionally gets in the way. There is so much context required that the “why” is not always subjective. It can be objective reasoning or random sequence of events that were badly done.

        Not discounting the fact that there are situations where the “why” is subjective, like you are talking about where the person knows about the human shield and intentionally just targets them for no other reason and it is not collateral. However, this is a sterilized scenario that does not always occur.

        • robotopera@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          They may not know the human shield is a human shield

          Its a hospital

          human shields are not always tied up and may act independently enough that they are consciously accepting someone’s orders as a volunteer

          Its a hospital

          There could be stray shots or the human shield intentionally gets in the way

          Its a hospital

      • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s really quite simple. You’ve set up a phony dichotomy wherein one either supports the killing of all innocent civilians used as “shields” by Hamas, or one is somehow morally obliged to argue that Israel has no right to exist or defend itself.

        It’s a bullshit dichotomy.

        You’re arguing an “either/or” situation when in fact there are many other alternatives.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          or one is somehow morally obliged to argue that Israel has no right to exist or defend itself.

          That’s not what is implied. You’ve somehow managed to create a straw man false dichotomy that you can tear down. Impressive. Their is another alternative where neither the hostage or their taker is killed. Which is what is being negotiated now. Israel could have done that from the beginning, instead of bombing civilian children.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    To anyone both sides-ing this issue, you are flattening the genocide. This is an overwhelmingly lopsided conflict. One side has the funding and backing of the largest military presence the world has ever known. One side has caged and gated the other into increasingly smaller and smaller spaces, like literal concentration camps. This one side has decided that healthcare, housing, food, water, communications, etc are not important to provide to the people who they’ve effectively imprisoned. This side has people at the highest points of leadership calling for ethnic cleansing. This side has been called out by the UN for genocide.

    The other side is fighting back on their land, among their own people, in a space that is one of the densest populations on the planet per square foot, in a place with no resources, cannot leave, must defer to settlers who take their property if they leave it due to threat. None of this is by their own choosing. Guerrilla warfare is a tactic used when asymmetry is stark and is often negatively criticised without context to its necessity. Both side-sing ensures that the asymmetrical nature of this conflict remains status quo.

    • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think this is a bad take.

      First of all, it assumes that there are only two sides when in reality, there’s an incredible multitude of groups and factions with their own interests - whether it’s Hamas or the IDF or the Palestinian Islamic Jihad or militant Jewish settlers or Hezbollah or the Iranian leadership or Qatar or the Houthi rebels or any of the other groups that have been involved just in this current conflict.

      And secondly, it inherently blames everyone put into either Group A or Group B for the absolutely worst, horrendous atrocities committed by the most extreme elements categorized into those groups.

      So suddenly, Israeli citizens who were just a few weeks ago demonstrating against the Netanyahu government are now responsible for atrocities committed by the IDF in Gaza or by some violent settlers in the West Bank. And vice versa, Palestinian families who had to flee their home, maybe lost innocent family members to arbitrary bombing campaigns and are now living as refugees under the most dire circumstances are suddenly responsible for the murder of Israeli civilians, for Israeli children burned, for young Israeli women murdered and paraded around the streets in Gaza, and for all the atrocities committed by Hamas.

      That makes absolutely zero sense.

      Pointing out that atrocities are being committed by many different factions and groups doesn’t constitute “both-sidesing” the issue, it’s not some kind of enlightened centrism to pretend that it’s just impossible to form an opinion on the issue.

      There is no hierarchy of suffering, either. Hamas doesn’t stop being a terrorist organization just because the IDF killed more Palestinians than Hamas murdered Israelis.

      But, by the same token, the Netanyahu government doesn’t stop being a right wing extremist government hell bent on destroying democratic institutions in Israel in favor of an authoritarian system just because murderous Islamist terrorists stormed across the Gaza border and killed 1,200 Israelis in the most heinous way imaginable.

      And no, pointing out all of the atrocities committed in this conflict or existing empathy for all the innocent victims doesn’t equate to condoning certain atrocities committed by a certain group.

    • vivadanang@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      so we should just ignore Hamas’s war crimes because Israel bad.

      We should ignore Hamas’s focus on killing jews specifically? Israel is bad, sure, but every time I start to think that maybe Hamas could be dealt with equitably they go and murder civilians. Just like the Israelis do.

      I feel sorry for the Palestinians not aligned with Hamas, they’re the real victims in all this.

      • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Again scope and focus: IDF minister, "There will be no electricity, no food, and no fuel, everything will be closed. We are fighting against human animals and will act accordingly.” This is the genocidal rhetoric.

        Hamas is fighting a war within a prison where the guards are defacto Israelis. Who the fuck else would they announce that they would be fighting for freedom?

        Israel is in complete control over this entire conflict, their actions dictate the reactions from those they indefinitely hold in concentration camps. Do I want both sides to stop killing each other? Yes! But it requires bigger decisions by those in control otherwise the status quo remains and in a year or 5 we’ll see this same type of senseless killing/genocide again like the last 70 years.

        • vivadanang@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          scope and focus? did you not see the children murdered by hamas? the pregnant women? for fuck’s sake get some perspective. they’re all killing innocents. they’re all murdering third party bystanders. And until religion goes away, it’s never going to stop.

          You’ll be happy to know I’m pissing off both sides, who see any discussion of responsibility on all participants as the* true evil.* Because it takes two parties to fight, but somehow Hamas is the victim here.

          Frankly I’m tired of it all; pissant people with their religious conflict over land some asshat decided was ‘the holy land’ because their religious grift got out of control and now it’s gotta be a ‘holy war’ because they all believe their fucking invisible friends are real and there’s some paradise waiting after murdering people - settlers, jihadists, what’s the difference? THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT THEIR OWN INNOCENTS, why should the rest of the world?

          The middle east lacks the imagination to see beyond the next murder, because it’s never their fault, it’s always the other guy, so let’s just continue the killing right?

          get fucked, maybe you just deserve each other’s horrible company.

      • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, I am not saying that and see such misdirections as not constructive. It is a matter of focus and scale. Focus on the power structure that creates conditions upon which Hamas is formed and persists: Israeli occupation, destruction, and genocide of Palestine. The scale of the death of civilians on both sides demonstrates how Israel continues to create the conditions. I vehemently disagree with killing civilians but the civilian death count on Israel’s side is exponentially larger than Hamas’ and perpetuates the conflict, among others.

  • Jocker Black
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    But this is the most reasonable response.

    If they realize that human shields aren’t working, they won’t use them and a more optimal number of people will be killed overall.

    Also, any human shields you kill should be attributed to the people using those human shields.

    Thats my take on this. I will agree to disagree with anyone who thinks otherwise.

    PS: For all those replying: where did the words “Israel” and “Hamas” come from? I would like to bring to your attention that I didn’t cover any details specific to the conflict anywhere above… As far as I am concerned:

    • Hamas is a terrorist organization
    • civilians in Gaza are innocent
    • Opinions about Israel are based entirely on Hamas reporting which could.be accurate or could be misinformation.

    PPS: Lets play some mental games for a second.

    Statement 1: X is mass murdering innocent people. And Y is trying to kill X.

    Who is the bad guy and who is the good guy? X is bad Y is good.

    Now let me reveal How X is mass murdering people.

    Statement 2: X is doing so by putting those innocent people into the fire of Y on X.

    You cannot tell me Y is worse than X after that. I don’t say that we can’t judge Y for attacking X under these circumstances, but X is never better than Y.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      If they realize that human shields aren’t working, they won’t use them and a more optimal number of people will be killed overall.

      Israel has claimed it is shooting through human shields for decades. Do you think Hamas is too stupid to realize that it doesn’t work?

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hamas likes it when Israel kills Palestinian citizens, because it make Israel justifiably look bad. Hamas wants to get other countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran involved in the war, and dead Palestinian civilians helps that goal.

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          8 months ago

          That completely contradicts your original point, that “If they realize that human shields aren’t working, they won’t use them”

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              24
              ·
              8 months ago

              Well fuck I just responded from my inbox. Whatever.

              So you think Israel is too stupid to realize how bad this makes them look and they are playing right into Hamas’s hands?

              • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                No, I think they don’t really care and won’t until they get support pulled by the US. And given the US is negotiating a ceasefire, and civilian casualties have gone down the last week, the US may have threatened just that.

    • Prunebutt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      If they realize that human shields aren’t working, they won’t use them and a more optimal number of people will be killed overall.

      Kill civilians first, sort the rest out, later. /s

      Also, any human shields you kill should be attributed to the people using those human shields.

      Allegedly using. The IDF has yet to offer not debunked evidence that any hospital/refugee camp they bombed actually sheltered Hamas.

  • Gladaed@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    Using human shields makes you a war criminal. Attacking someone using human shields does not technically make you a war criminal, because it does not endanger civilians without furthering your “just” goal of killing that war criminal.

    Please correct me if I am wrong. You still should consider if killing the war criminal is worth the cost and this does not mean civilians had it coming by any means.

    • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are you simply uninformed, or do you see all of the 50%-children population of Gaza as the war criminals here? Few Hamas terrorists using hospitals (still not believably proven) for various reasons and IDF bombing these critical service buildings for civilians, while hundreds of civilians are using them, is how come attacking the human-shield users only?

      For clarity, no one is arguing against Israel retaliating against Hamas at this conflict. Hamas has proven themselves to be pretty clearly a terrorist organization in their acts, whatever their goals are. The whole world is calling them as such accordingly. What sane people argue here is that IDF has also clearly proven to be a terrorist organization, with a civilian killing scale of sheer efficiency of a regular army and the so called western humanitarian governments are turning s blind eye to it, or worse trying to pass it as something just.

  • gearheart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah… It’s like strapping bombs of civilians but giving the enemy the trigger.

    Both sides are fucked up. No justifying one or the other.

  • Globeparasite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    How can you misunderstand propaganda The propaganda is : “they use human shield so when you shot at them we can’t avoid killing civilians”

    The lie being that this is binary choice, either shoot the terrorist killing the civilian or don’t shoot and let the terrorist kill people. The reality is that you can also try to devise a tactic to outsmart them.

    And no you’re not fucking worse. If you take hostage and shot at the police when they enter and a civilian is killed in the firefight your 1000% getting charged for the death.

    Btw the “rethoric” is a fucking UN reports

  • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    So many armchair generals on this site. Yes lets just kill Hamas and not kill anyone else, because it’s just that simple. Mkay. Even better, lets just make them apologize and pinky promise not to do that again. That should be enough to solve the tensions in the region. You people think anyone gives a shit what war rules are when bullets are whizzing by? Am not trying to defend any side here, but I can’t see anyone not trying to do their best to survive whatever shit is at hand.

  • GardeningSadhu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    anyone trying to make this very complicated seem this simple is the problem… the truth is two groups of people hate each other and have been super shitty to each other for a long long long time. One group is going to destroy the other cause they can’t get along. No one is right, no one is wrong. It’s just the way that it is… yeah, that’s shitty. I didn’t decide for things to be this way though.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It really is.

        It’s a cop out because you can say that about any conflict. “They hate each other, that’s just the way it is.”

        It’s also a license to continue the egregious conduct, because “it can’t be solved.”

  • SadCack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    This take is pretty dumb. If someone is taking hostages, and killing some hostages guarantees that the purpertrator can’t take future hostages, it’s a shorty but understandable tradeoff. In the context of of the Israel/Gaza conflict it is infinity more complex. Please read about the history of the region and the nature of the conflict.