Upvote=agree, comment to add more.

  • Water Bowl Slime@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    True, but sanctions are something that America imposes often and they’re usually successful at devastating a country so I don’t think it’s comparable.

    Like, in America’s ideal world, what were they aiming for? To create a world with an unmanageably diseased population?

    • cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think the Amerikkkan capitalists figured that sacrificing the lives of millions is the preferred outcome to China surpassing them.

      • Water Bowl Slime@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        But that’s the thing - in the situation where the disease was so dangerous that even China couldn’t handle it, what’s America gonna do? Their own country would have collapsed a hundred times over by then.

    • guojing
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s just not true. The stated goal of sanctions is regime change. Yet Cuba or DPRK have been under sanctions for decades with no effect in that regard.

      • Water Bowl Slime@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        And then there’s Zimbabwe, Libya, Iraq, Nicaragua, Yugoslavia, etc.

        Those 2 countries are an exception and even then, they still face immense pressure from getting sanctioned. I wouldn’t say they’ve had no effect, they’ve definitely fueled civil unrest and caused crises.

        • guojing
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m not denying that, but clearly there was no regime change. And in the countries you mention there was war necessary for that.

            • guojing
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              That those are different things. Can’t be so hard to understand.

              • Water Bowl Slime@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Me: sanctions hurt countries

                You: two sanctioned countries haven’t been couped yet

                Me: just because they haven’t been couped doesn’t mean they haven’t been hurt

                You: yeah but they haven’t been couped yet

                I really don’t understand what you’re trying to communicate here. Or how any of this relates to the topic of this thread.