Yep it is… here’s one example:

Those findings mirror a 2015 poll by the Vegetarian Resource Group, that found 8% of black people were strictly vegetarian, compared to 3.4% overall.

Recently, a January poll by Gallup found that 31% of non-white Americans had reduced their meat consumption in the past year, compared to only 19% of white Americans.

• https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53787329
• https://www.saveur.com/culture/vegan-restaurants-harlem

Historically, consumption of flesh hasn’t been “necessary” since the agricultural revolution ~10k years ago(not to mention a lot of hunter-gatherer societies got the majority of their calories from gathering, not hunting), when humanity began to get all its food energy from cultivated crops, and humanity’s population and biomass exploded upwards. Ever since then, animal domestication, ie flesh and dairy consumption, was limited to feudal lords and upper classes who had the large tracts of land and water necessary to cultivate those. Carnist production really only took off with capitalism and colonialism in the new world, where indigenous eviction provided the large amount of land necessary for carnist industry, and animal bodies and their rape-products could be turned into food and clothing commodities. This is the only poorer countries that do have higher levels of meat consumption (Mexico, Brazil, etc) were able to do so via indigenous eviction… and nowadays you still see the colonialist carnist industries cutting swathes through rainforests and countrysides to make room for cheap beef.

Flesh consumption (much like having a yard / “manor”, having servants, etc) has since the agricultural revolution been bourgeois imitation, something the opulent feudal lords engage in, that via capitalist ideological hegemony is something the poor “should” aspire to have.