• Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s inevitable whenever there are mods. Sometimes people just clash but in my experience I always just remind myself ‘who are the types of people who would voluntarily want to be a mod?’ and then I go outside and speak with actual humans.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did on reddit, but that’s because reddit mods are power-hungry shitstains who will argue that your comment is aimed at the lgbt community, until you direct them to the fact that you are part of the lgbt community, and then suddenly they change their narrative and it’s not, it’s just aimed at women, when I point out that the comment was about my negative experiences with a childhood male ‘doctor’, and then it becomes “I’m not going to argue anymore [because I’ve run out of bullshit reasons to veil the fact that I support this kind of abuse of power as I draw parallels from my mod experience and your pain being valid hurts my microscopic pp and massive ego]”

      I’ve had a few run-ins but that was one specifically was fucking wild. Give people a bit of fake power and they lose their fucking minds.

      Everyone here has been pretty cool, no drama.

    • pingveno
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The mods on /c/worldnews actively put a thumb on the scale when it comes to subjects like the Israeli-Palstinian conflict. If you don’t follow the party line, your comment is subject to removal. That “No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc” rule does a lot of work. It’s not worth getting in a fight over, but I was a little sore that my comment about taking Hamas’ casualty statistics with a grain of salt would be prudent was deleted, while downright hateful comments towards Israel were left standing.

      • Shatur
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s sad to hear. I believe that healthy discussion should always be welcomed even if you disagree. And hateful things should always be discouraged.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The .world admins have always been corrupt and they’re doing it on purpose to ensure the internet remains censored and that Americans never have a free place to converse about what they need to converse about.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The way Lemmy mods hand out bans, not for fucking long.

      People wag a finger at me for vulgarity and bluntness. But I’ve found zero safety in being polite, casual, and relaxed. Most recently, one joke about The Bee Movie in a silly playlist screenshot community ended two bewildered interactions later, with the mod instructing me to “die mad.” To anyone innocent enough to insist this sort of thing can only happen if I’m underplaying some intolerable behavior on my part - I have abundant receipts. This has been a problem long enough (on the other site) that smoke without fire deserved documentation.

      And the absolute worst spaces on modern social media are ones demanding “be nice” while doing nothing when some asshole spits the worst thing they can think of over nothing. I’m not about to be deeply offended by some childmove like opining about my family because I didn’t find an argument compelling. But I cannot fucking stand being held from so much as literally replying “yo mama,” for fear of punishment from some I-don’t-care-who-started-it troll-enabling goody-two-shoes, only to find out reports went fucking nowhere.

      Mods! If I’m not allowed to call someone a bastard - YOU had goddamn well better get rid of those bastards. Enforce the rule or throw it out!

  • Jorgelino
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Do we really call ourselves “lemmings”? I fee like that kind of portrays the wrong image of us.

    I mean, it’s like voluntarily going by “sheeple” or something. Do people not know what lemmings are anymore?

      • Jorgelino
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean, still. I associate them with the games more than anything. And that’s definetily not the kind of look i’d want out of a community that originated specifically because they DIDN’T want to just follow the herd and use what’s popular regardless of how shitty it gets.

        • pixelscript
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Idk, crusading against common myths is something that’s pretty hot these days. Stuff like:

          • Christopher Columbus didn’t actually discover America, and he was actually kind of an asshat
          • Bell didn’t invent the telephone, he was simply the first to patent and subsequently litigate
          • “Frankenstein” is the name of the scientist, not the monster
          • Many modern tropes about Christian Hell stem from a 17th century political satire novel

          Crusading for truth in easily verifiable matters feels very on-brand for the kind of people who use Lemmy. In that light, reclaiming a negative term that’s only negative because of a false premise to describe ourselves doesn’t sound so bad. At worst, we become a little insufferable as we have to introduce the term with a “well, ackshually”, which a lot of us would probably do anyway.