Ford Motor Co. Executive Chairman Bill Ford called on autoworkers to come together to end a monthlong strike that he says could cost the company the ability to invest in the future.

In a rare speech during contract talks in the company’s hometown of Dearborn, Michigan, Ford said high labor costs could limit spending to develop new vehicles and invest in factories. “It’s the absolute lifeblood of our company. And if we lose it, we will lose to the competition. America loses. Many jobs will be lost,” said the great grandson of company founder Henry Ford.

The company, he said, builds more vehicles in America and has more United Auto Workers employees than any company, which has increased its costs in a highly competitive industry.

Ford has 57,000 UAW workers compared with 46,000 at GM and 43,000 at Stellantis. “Many of our competitors moved jobs to Mexico as we added jobs here in the U.S.,” Ford said.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like the executives should take a pay cut.

    • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Realistically executive salaries probably won’t cover a salary increase across the workforce foe the whole country. Not doing a stock buy back just might though.

        • Dippy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Take 100mil off his comp for employees, divide by their 57,000 UAWs listed above, divide by 52 (weeks), then 40 (hrs). Gets you an 0.84$ per hour per employee.

          In reality, based on latest filing, CEO’s comp for 2022 was 21 mil so 0.16$ raise per employee if you didn’t pay the ceo.

          Ford did 484mil $ in buy backs in 2022. Would give each 4$/hr raise

          Seen this a few times. Rarely does the ceo taking less really make much of a dent for people living paycheck to paycheck. Yea 16 cents is better than nothing but also not what these people need.

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would say all of the execs need lower pay. That would give them $52 million which works out to an extra $0.42/hr or about $900 per year. That is a perfectly fine addition to the $4/hr from stock buybacks.

            • Wrench@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Stock buy backs were a single transaction, not a recurring annual transaction, so not apples to apples on wage.

              What they should have done is grant those stocks to their employees. Or their pension fund, whatever mechanism is most fair.

              To your point, it spreads thinly over a large work force. But sharing profits is the “right” thing to do.

          • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A lot of that CEO comp is also not in the form of cash, it’s in the form of things like stocks. So a lack of stock buy backs would automatically lower CEO/exec comp as well. That lowered Exec pay wouldn’t go directly to the employees (since it can’t be double counted) but if one of the goals is closing the delta as some have mentioned then no buy backs helps with both.

      • Djtecha@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue is the massive delta they’ve created. If it was 2to1 it wouldn’t be such a sticking point.

  • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    1 year ago

    His salary in 2022 was 17.3 million and that’s down from 18.7 million in 2021. They could have paid 200 employees 85k a year instead of one pointless executive. So maybe the executives are the reason for the company going under.

    https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/ford/2023/03/31/heres-how-much-ford-ceo-jim-farley-made-last-year/70067820007/#:~:text=Bill Ford Jr.'s total,%2421.5 million in direct compensation.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s just salary.

      His other compensations, benefits, and free services like company jets and private dining, provide a very significant increase of their own.

      C-level compensation is never merely in pay, there’s a whole incredibly expensive ecosystem to support as well.

      And, in addition to his surprising decision to pay himself more than his predecessor, he was a major stock holder before he took over the position, so he’s getting dividends and stockholder equity as well.

      Heyyyy, wait a minute.

      Didn’t he decide to do a stock buyback with company funds? 3.5 billion worth over the past decade? $400 million in the last year?

      Weren’t those things considered the kind of market manipulation that helped cause the Great Depression?

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 year ago

    First, let’s talk about stock buybacks, government bailouts, pandemic assistance money, and record profits, all of which happened after workers accepted reduced pay and reduced benefits to help “make the company profitable again”.

      • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Profit also means money isn’t being used for future investment into the company. Funny, they weren’t complaining about these lack of investments just a year or two ago when cars were getting marked up and selling $10k+ above MSRP.

  • Starkstruck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Y’know, he could always just AGREE TO THEIR TERMS! The company being at stake is the entire point of unionizing.

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ford spent almost $500 million on stock buybacks in 2022. GM spent around $3 billion. Maybe priorities needs to be adjusted.

  • forrgott@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “This strike is preventing my company from having a future”

    Umm. Yes. Yes it is. That’s the entire point you complete idiot.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      But what about all the work his grest grandfather did to build the company? Shouldn’t he be entitled to live large off that man’s work by virtue of his birthright?

      So what if these workers who actually build the product that Ford sells can’t afford food or shelter. This man struggled to be born into the correct family, and he’s entitled to his fortune!

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lmao, talk to any former ford employee and they’ll probably show the middle finger to the entire board if they could.

    They run the layoff cycle literally every other year to cut costs whenever sales even hint at slowing down, all while paying CEOs massive money.

    “Yeah we moved to mexico less than our competitors so that makes us better”

  • argo_yamato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh boohoo Bill.

    But he also said Ford is paying CEO Jim Farley $21 million per year when starting pay for Ford factory workers is up only about $3 per hour from when he started with the company 31 years ago.

    Ford’s offer of a 23% general wage increase barely covers inflation over the last three or four years, said Applebee, 59.

  • AkaBobHoward@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds to me like he has plenty of power to end the strike, he can see the concrete requirements from the workers. Grant them, in full, strike ends, company safe. Sounds simple Mr. 21 Million plus perks.

  • teamevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well then Ford make a decision. Do you want a company or not, because you can absolutely remain profitable whilst paying your employees properly. Without employees to do the labor to make the products you sell you have nothing, so it seems like the best course of action would be to make sure the folks ensuring your business has product to sell should be properly motivated to continue to want to provide their time and labor. Their time is the same as the Csuite’s time, you cannot get it back, so they deserve to get paid properly.