• pingveno
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m curious where that 75% of employees would even come from. I have my doubts that they can just slice off 3/4 of their workforce and not jeopardize the long term viability of the company. Not to mention I assume tasks like reviewing reported tweets must be highly labor intensive.

    It looks like they have monetized their API. I can’t see how they monetize the actual UI itself.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      My experience is that SV companies tend to hire people as part of demonstrating growth to investors. Layoffs starting with the data engineering team is suggestive that they may deprioritize analytics going forward. Twitter having less moderation going forward is also highly likely. At the end of the day these companies just care that enough users stay on the platform to monetize. Remains to be seen where this goes, but it’s certainly possible for twitter to be profitable if they focus on direct monetization. For example, if they charge a fee for blue check accounts that could create a significant revenue.

      • pingveno
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        The irony is that Twitter isn’t even really that big of a platform as Internet giants go. It has outsized influence because it’s the platform of choice for media outlets, journalists, celebrities, etc.

          • Daryl76679
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            In fact, Techlore got banned from there and created their own update system complete with an RSS feed.