• peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t know if I would have used Tiananmen Square.

    The Uighur re-education cities seems far more fitting.

    • Gorilladrums@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or the invasion of Vietnam… Or the annexation of Tibet… Or the bullying of Southeast Asian countries… Or the great leap forward… Or the communist land reforms… Or the anti counterrevolutionary campaigns

      The CCP leaves you no end of really good options to pick here.

    • CyclohexaneM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah tiananmen is such a meme at this point. You can tell when people base their entire politics on memes and don’t bother reading and searching on their own. Tiananmen is an issue they won’t step mentioning.

        • CyclohexaneM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think the other comment on this thread addressed it pretty well: https://hexbear.net/comment/4003110

          I’m pretty skeptical about taking political positions from memes, and when I’ve done my own research on this, I failed to find valid reasons that this issue should get the attention that the Internet gives it. There are many other issues that are worth my attention. This one isn’t.

            • CyclohexaneM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Plenty of sources provided in there (ny times, reuters, etc), but if you were the kind to examine evidence, you wouldn’t be here anyways.

                • CyclohexaneM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I love how you ignored everything in the article except what could possibly agree with your viewpoint. On your first quote, the link they cite does not exist anymore. In the video you linked, I hear gunshots but don’t see people running away from them. As someone from a country that saw unrest and shooting at protests, I can tell you that people immediately start running when they’re shot at, emptying the area. Not continue to March nonchalantly.

                  In the end, I want to conclude with saying that I didn’t deny that anyone died (although the comment I linked does seem to imply that. My apologies for not clarifying, as I was only using them to back up my opinion). What I said in the original comment is that it is not an issue worth my attention. I’ve seen and read about so many government rerpression, and this is far from being in the top 10. It’s an unnecessarily magnified issue.

          • Gamey@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not even going to click on that, the domain tells me everything I need to know considering the topic we talk about!

            • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I mean, it’s a variety of sourced quotes from respected journalists who were there. You probably should read them all, if only so you can point out to the Hexbears where they mention all the people who died in the area around the Square. The sources mostly say “no one got gunned down literally in the Square.”

              In any case, it’s fucking weird to obsess over it. It’s like trying to give Biden crap about the Kent State Massacre while he’s rounding up all the Mormons.

            • CyclohexaneM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Plenty of evidence cited there from multiple sources. You don’t have to open it, but the evidence is there shall you question it.

              • Gamey@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Abother user made a very good comment about this under my post, might be worth checking out!

                • CyclohexaneM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I agree with that commenter. I do not claim that “nothing happened”. I said this in my earlier comments, that I just don’t think it’s a problem worth my attention.

          • punkisundead [they/them]@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Numerous military buses, trucks, armored vehicles, and tanks being burned by the “peaceful” protesters. Sometimes the soldiers were allowed to escape, and sometimes they were brutally killed by the protesters. Numerous protesters were armed with Molotov cocktails and even guns.

            Sounds like a full blown insurrection.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I knew this was going to be the only one people tried to deny in this thread, but I didn’t figure it would be OP