I feel like I had a stroke reading this, and legit can’t figure out what “indiv mandate for health ins & NYT paywall” even means.
I can glean that they’re talking about news site paywalls in the second part… but who gets that content for free? who gets through adblock blockers? what the fuck is she even talking about? but what the fuck are ‘health ins’? that makes absolutely no sense.
I think she’s trying to be consistent in that she thinks both health care and fake news like the NYT need to bar poor people (“freeloaders” in liberal lexicon) from participating.
I feel like I had a stroke reading this, and legit can’t figure out what “indiv mandate for health ins & NYT paywall” even means.
I can glean that they’re talking about news site paywalls in the second part… but who gets that content for free? who gets through adblock blockers? what the fuck is she even talking about? but what the fuck are ‘health ins’? that makes absolutely no sense.
I think she’s trying to be consistent in that she thinks both health care and fake news like the NYT need to bar poor people (“freeloaders” in liberal lexicon) from participating.
This still makes zero sense to me, even with help. What the fuck are the liberals on?
This is what applying the logic of arcane physical private property laws to intellectual property does to a mf