Even back in the Windows 3.1 or 95 days I didn’t have to reboot this often - sometimes twice a day. Seems a bit excessive?

  • Ocelot@lemmies.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    you should only need to reboot when updating the kernel. Why are you rebooting? Is it because the system is unresponsive?

    • cygnus@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m using the KDE version and updates come in automatically through Discover. They almost always announce in the system tray that a reboot is required.

      • frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        65
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You also don’t have to reboot when Discover says to. It’s just saying that the updates won’t take effect until you reboot. It could probably be worded better, for sure.

        • Ocelot@lemmies.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think that installing new versions often means that particular services need to be restarted. Rather than implement logic to restart relevant services, it probably just says “fuck it, reboot”.

          • federalreverse-old@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Eh, no. It only downloads the packages, then asks you to reboot and installs the new packages during the boot process. This means you get a clean system afterward in which no pre-update binaries are being run anymore. It just comes at the price that you need a full reboot for something that usually needs a session relogin at worst.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          On the other hand you rather have to put a gun to the average GUI user’s head to get them to reboot ever, otherwise the computer will sit there for months on end until finally they shut it down once and it can finally apply updates.

        • cygnus@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interesting, I assumed I’d have to live with it… Would changing that setting be a bad idea?

            • cygnus@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Well that was easy. Thank you very much, I may stick to Fedora for a while longer!

              For anyone wondering, just edit /etc/xdg/discoverrc and change the flag to “false”.

              Edit: looks like it can also be changed with a checkbox in system settings > software updates.

      • infinitevalence@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        sigh… i hate to say it but do your updates via command line because it will actually tell you if you need a reboot. As said above, it should only be for Kernel updates, and even then it will tell you that it will switch kernels next reboot and keep running on the current one.

        Most desktop applications for doing updates ask you to reboot not because its needed, but because they are being “safe” or not running with the same user rights as you are in the terminal.

        • cygnus@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why does no other distro do that though? I’ve tried a bunch before and this is the first time I get that notification sitting there taunting me.

          • slembcke
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hrm. Skim ahead if you already know some of this… So say you have a running program XYZ that loads libUseful.so to do useful things. Now you run some updates and libUseful.so gets replaced with the new version. Because of how files on Unix work, the old version still exists on the disk until XYZ closes it, but any new program will load the new version. So things generally “just work” when the system is updated in place, but on the rare occasion causes weird problems. Fedora (from the GUI) chooses to run updates during reboot to prevent the rare, weird problems. If you update from the command line, it just does them in place. Kernel updates always require a reboot to apply though.

          • Tobias Hunger@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            After applying an update you need to make sure anything using the unmatched code is replaced by the patched code. A reliable way to do that is a reboot. Actually a reboot is pretty much the only reliable way to do that.

            So I am not surprised that a distribution targeting end users asks for a reboot.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It has been a while since I have used Fedora but this is not unique to that distro. Arch will also tell you to reboot if the kernel, systemd, and a few other packages are updated. I rarely do it right away though.