• Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I searched for her name and despite the RFE article being a week old, no other more credible outlets have picked up on it. Maybe other outlets are using a different romanization of her name but this is certainly a red flag.

    • socsa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It literally isn’t. RFE is definitely a US propaganda platform, but it objectively has nothing to do with the CIA these days. But you should probably check under your bed one more time just to make sure.

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        87
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        RFE also “objectively” had nothing to do with the CIA for nearly 20 years after it was created, at which point it turned out the CIA had been funding it all along. But now we know they’ve stopped because they said they did, and anyone suggesting that they’re not editorially independent is a paranoid loon, just as they would’ve been in the 50’s and 60’s.

        Some of us don’t believe that the people whose job it is to lie stopped lying because they said they did. Suggesting that the CIA is still doing things that they did regularly and successfully kept hidden in the past is not a conspiracy theory.

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The CIA routinely funds groups covertly. As is the case with RFE, we are often able to confirm this covert funding decades later.

        A main purpose of the CIA is to obscure what groups the U.S. supports. Did they just stop doing their job one day?

    • Zaroni@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Compared to Russian sources radio free liberty is a baron of truth and press accountability, so frankly it does not matter.

      • RegularGoose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        A shitty source not being the absolute worst source doesn’t make it any less shitty than it is. If your only options for news are US government propaganda or Russian government propaganda, the only valid choice is to stop following the news.

    • gnuhaut
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      The makers of this map, Freedom House, receive funding mainly from the US government. They also took money from BAE Systems, Britain’s biggest arms manufacturer.

        • BigNote@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The argument would be that their findings are therefore somehow tainted and unreliable. However, without any evidence that this is so, simply pointing it out as if it’s some kind of “gotcha” is in fact fallacious, as you suggest.

      • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, well it might not be the best source, but at least they have a map that measures something interesting. The second best option would have been the map of press freedom index. It’s not quite the same things and it isn’t entirely relevant to the conversation either, but there you go. At least it tells you something about the attitude different countries have towards the media, which may or may not be associated with the attitude towards activists. This map also paints a slightly more nuanced picture, but the conclusion is largely the same as before.

        See also: Wikipedia

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ukraine’s being yellow is just wrong. It doesn’t really matter if it’s fair, but with the ongoing war and the effects of it on the society and its attitudes towards press the color should be orange.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, there’s less bias typical for UK-funded sources than usual. At least Azerbaijan is not the same color as Armenia (thought the UK seem to have made a 180-degree turn on that conflict in the last couple of weeks, while keeping the same “formal”"legal" position).

        Ah, that’s OT, about Russia - it would be purple on that map even before 2008.

    • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      …and Russia seems to be in the same group with most of Africa Middle East and Asia. Considering this context, the news article doesn’t seem surprising at all. Just another sad day in American brain dead news for morons.

      Honestly how do you people manage to tie your shoelaces?

    • Piye@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      So is Turkey, your NATO ally who bombs minorities and steals other peoples cultural heritage. Stop being a hypocrite

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Turkey is a genocidal horde. Russia one could call controversial before 2022, now it’s just miserable and on its way to becoming a trainwreck.

          EDIT: What I meant - it’s a good example, if you just call that “controversial” and not a problem to be solved now, while Russia somehow is.

      • socsa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Big words from someone who just brought three different forms of sharia law into BRICS.

        I still don’t fucking understand why tankies simp so hard for this shit. It’s like you are trying to prove that your philosophy is no deeper than “America bad.”

          • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lemmygrad 🤡

            (Also Putin is not a communist, but a post-fascist masquerading as an anti-fascist)

            • Duży Szef [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Also Putin is not a communist, but a post-fascist masquerading as an anti-fascist

              Wow, so you do actually have eyes! Fucking hell, you are raising my respect for you!

              Fun fact, I would nothing but for Putin to get hanged. But not by American imperialists and their lapdogs, but by the russian proletariat for the reestablishment of an RSFSR.

              So sorry buddy. It seems your assumption about me has been wrong, I suggest lurking more before speaking about your opponents.

              • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                but by the russian proletariat for the reestablishment of an RSFSR.

                “Russian proletariat” is mostly ansyn or Trotskyist, when political, just informing you. EDIT: And also it’s a very little portion of the society.

                And most of those sporting Commie symbolic just use it cause USSR big, USSR strong, USSR everybody fear, USSR boom, but somehow later boom.

      • BigNote@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately NATO wasn’t designed in a way that conceived of a rogue member state like Turkey. This means that it has a very limited toolkit for reigning in Erdogan’s excesses. He also has a huge amount of leverage due to Turkey’s pivotal role on the Black Sea which is obviously critical to everything happening in Ukraine. For now, NATO really does have its hands tied with regard to Turkey.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, it doesn’t really, they just don’t want to do anything. Everything happening in Ukraine started happening much later than Turkey happened.

          And about NATO design not conceiving of something - when Turkey was admitted to NATO, there were people still alive who saw not their parents and grandparents, but their children and grandchildren killed before their eyes in 1915-1921.

          It was conceived that if somebody really wanted to get rid of that thing, then it’d be possible to make a shortcut on paperwork with all the military power. 1952, remember. But then again, it was 1952, you know, colonial powers still being that and not caring much about genocides of brown people. So nobody would see Turkey’s current behavior as a problem.

          • BigNote@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think I follow your arguments. Is there a way you can rephrase your point such that a dummy like myself might understand it?

            • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago
              1. About rogue member states not being thought of when NATO was being created - when NATO was being created, even France and UK were more likely to behave like “rogue member states” and they did in some little known cases (Biafra, for example, or the Suez crisis). And Turkey was full-blown fascist (well, it didn’t stop being that at any point since then till now, just Westerners conveniently assumed that it changed like Japan, say, one my relative in the US from Jewish side is just in complete denial that it hasn’t as it wasn’t civilized by bombs, while at the same time uneasy with my cousins going to Germany).

              2. About NATO having its hands tied against Turkey due to Ukraine - if A happened before B, you can’t justify A with B. So you can’t justify Turkey getting away with everything it does by Russia vs Ukraine taking all the attention.

              • BigNote@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not talking about anyone being justified; I am talking about realpolitik and the fact that in international relations it’s often the case that what ought to be is often in direct conflict with what actually is.

                It would be awesome if we could live in a world of absolutes wherein national interests never conflicted with moral ambiguity, but that’s just not reality at all, sorry to inform.

                • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And why then it’s a problem that Russia wreaks havoc in Ukraine?..

                  And I don’t see Western states acting in their best interest anyway. I actually see something between slow surrender to the worst of their competition and some weird kind of “let no one win”, trying to empower the worst savages while simply not working with those of competitors who shouldn’t necessarily be their adversaries. You can also take a look at the people which reach the top in European and US political classes, these are of, eh, declining quality.

                  Also for my second point - an event in the future still can’t be the cause for an event in the past, justification or not.

                  Other than that - large parts of NATO \ West “civilization offering”, so to say, were about freedom and human rights.

                  And large parts of the Soviet alternative were about humanism and equality and unification.

                  And if it’s casual for you that people were not supposed to believe in any of that in either case, then I don’t get it why people here are so eager to point out Soviet hypocrisies as if they were any different.

                  It’d be probably also awesome for realpolitik fans to not forget how real world works in terms of errors. Right now an error in your security systems means some protest, some Assange or Snowden, some scandal. Getting into realpolitik too much would shift those errors to justified terrorist acts. Well, I suppose that may be one reason why some countries are so eager to get rid of nuclear energy despite all the green agenda in PR. Single point of failure and all that.

      • Kata1yst@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The best and last argument of dumb tankies is whataboutism. Thank you for your insightful contribution.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t think it’s whataboutism to point out that a worse criminal you are fine with, and a smaller one not, because the latter kills “blue-eyed Europeans” and all that.

          You can’t just discard observations that you are a hypocritical bag of piss with that one word, “whataboutism”. And it only refers to somebody defending their own crimes. Most of real whataboutism I see in social media comes from Turks and Westerners defending Turks.

          Other than that, if somebody says that and you don’t, I don’t care if they’re a tankie. Turkey is worse than a Stalinist dictatorship, and I have priorities.

          • Kata1yst@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually, that’s exactly what whataboutism is.

            Someone says: wow, topic A is bad.

            Whataboutism says: oh yeah, well B is bad/worse!!!1!

            Point is, we’re not talking about B/Turkey. And B/Turkey being bad doesn’t mean that A/Russia is excused from their terrible behavior.

            And (gasp!) Just because I oppose A/Russia doesn’t mean I support B/Turkey.

            The entire argument is bad faith and lacking any logic or critical thinking.

            • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you support the side opposite to Russia, be it Ukraine or NATO, you sort of support Turkey, cause of the context of alliances and relations. Turkey is in NATO and Turkey is friendly with Ukraine.

              Point is, we’re not talking about B/Turkey.

              We actually are doing that right now. If you don’t want to, you can leave this conversation. That’s the way conversations work.

              And B/Turkey being bad doesn’t mean that A/Russia is excused from their terrible behavior.

              Yes, it isn’t. You seem to imply that I said it is. I haven’t.

              And (gasp!) Just because I oppose A/Russia doesn’t mean I support B/Turkey.

              Not in general. But in our specific situation you sort of do through that opposing side being Turkey’s friend more than Russia itself.

              The entire argument is bad faith and lacking any logic or critical thinking.

              On all sides.

              Now, about bad faith - if people like you yelling “whataboutism” can prevent a conversation on a certain subject, then it’s not really whataboutism. If they can do that without preventing that conversation from happening, then maybe it is. “Whataboutism” is not a basic concept. Once we turn to logic instead of some list of common fallacies, we don’t need it (and also logic beats any such shortcut).

              Same with “critical thinking”.

    • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Russian pacifists want Russia to stop invading Ukraine.

      Lemmygrad / Hexbear pacifists want Ukraine to appease Russia and give up territory.

      They are not the same.

      • trot [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Russian pacifists want Russia to stop invading Ukraine.

        Western “pacifists” want to send NATO tanks to Ukraine.

        They are not the same.

        Russian anti-war activists have a correct position.

        But an important consideration should be whether one’s actions actually contribute to Russia withdrawing sooner, or if they instead help justify further, equally self-interested NATO involvement in the war.

        Unless you are Russian, it’s most likely the latter.

        There are two imperialist blocs involved in the conflict, and it doesn’t matter which one of them technically started it.

        • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are two imperialist blocs involved in the conflict, and it doesn’t matter which one of them technically started it.

          I’m sorry, but when it involves one imperialist bloc invading a smaller country, then it does matter.

          Do you have the same position regarding the Vietnam war, Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan? Or do you only support whichever side is not aligned with the US?

          • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            53
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The Vietnam War? You mean the one where a rebel faction backed by Russia rose up against a smaller, recently established pro-Western government, and the US came to the defense of that government, because if they lost the enemy would surely keep expanding more and more across the entire region, and all the peace advocates were dismissed as supporting appeasement? That Vietnam war?

            Yes, we take a similar position on that as we do to this, do you?

            • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Vietnam was opposing a puppet government imposed by the US.

              The Ukrainians opposed a Russian puppet government in 2013.

              Do you support both Vietnam and Ukraine?

              • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                50
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I support both the Vietnamese fighting against the South Vietnam puppet government and the Ukranians in the DPR fighting against the current Ukrainian puppet government, yes (though my support for the latter is more critical since they’re not communists)

                • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You did not answer my question.

                  Did you support the Ukrainians rebelling against their government back in 2013. Or do you only support a side if that side happens to oppose the US?

          • trot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I literally said that

            Russian anti-war activists have a correct position.

            Are you aware that it’s possible to want neither NATO tanks nor Russian tanks in Ukraine?

            You can even make sure you are consistent with both things in action 100% of the time - it’s a neat little trick called “opposing the position of your own government”.

            • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you aware that it’s possible to want neither NATO tanks nor Russian tanks in Ukraine?

              I am.

              But do you believe Ukraine is able to maintain their territory protected from Russia without NATO’s weapon supply?

              • Sphere [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                32
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                He most likely doesn’t believe Ukraine is able to maintain their territory protected from Russia with NATO’s weapon supply, and for good reason, given how clearly this is demonstrated by the utter failure of the vaunted counter-offensive. The only thing your position is really advocating is the useless deaths of vast numbers of Ukrainians (and Russians, for that matter).

                • The only thing your position is really advocating is the useless deaths of vast numbers of Ukrainians (and Russians, for that matter). [emphasis mine]

                  They never admit it, but the fact that Russian deaths will continue is one of if not the main reason these NATO dronies are fine with sacrificing the lives of all those Ukrainians they pretend to care about. Spoiler warning: they don’t actually care about Ukrainians. But they’ll still couch it in terms as if they’re “supporting Ukraine.” Such “Ukraine supporters” are either completely, pathetically fooled by obvious NATO propaganda or they are just bloodthirsty bigots (or both, which is most often the case).

                • teichflamme@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The mere fact that they are in the act of a counter offensive after Russia tried to blitz then shows that it’s not even close to what you’re describing.

                  Ukraine is holding their current territory pretty easily and gaining the upper hand very clearly.

              • trot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, just as it would be unable to resist NATO in being turned into a far-right paramilitary-led banana republic if Russia were to suddenly withdraw without any decrease in NATO involvement.

                But the beauty of the neat little trick above is that if the working classes of both sides correctly oppose their respective ruling classes’ interests, we can end up with a scenario where both sides lose - objectively the best outcome for the Ukrainian people, as well as everyone else.

                The Russian anti-war activists are clearly holding up their end of the bargain. Why are you not holding up yours?

                • CamaradeBoina [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Exactly this.

                  Revolutionary defeatism is the name of the word. Those who should be concerned with Russian imperialism must be russian working class people.

                  We in the west have to fight against our own imperalists. It’s very simple and in the end very logical.

                • orizuru@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The Russian anti-war activists are clearly holding up their end of the bargain. Why are you not holding up yours?

                  Ah! To be young and naive enough to believe that the anti-war activists in Russia have any leverage. They will all end up in Siberia or jumping out of a window.

                  Any regime change in Russia will come from the oligarchs, and the Russian working class will still be in a bad position (if not worse).

          • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The second you call Russia’s actions imperialist you just broadcast that you’re someone who just uses words for their impact and not their meaning and you should be completely disregarded in any conversation on the topic

            • SeaJ@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              TIL invading other countries and annexing their territories does not qualify as imperialism.

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It can involve that. But you’re using imperialism to “accuse them of what you’re doing before they can” by flattening all history and context away.

                Russia is defending itself from encirclement. Acting like you’re against imperialism rings hollow when you only apply it to an act of resistance to your empire expanding.

                • Encirclement by what? Countries that don’t like to suck off Russia anymore?

                  Maybe Russia should act less like an authoritarian mafia state and then its neighbours wouln’t turn away from it. Food for thought

      • InappropriateEmote [comrade/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, we want Ukraine to stop trying to ethnically cleanse the Donbas and give the people there self determination. And we want the Ukrainian government to stop forcibly conscripting people to go die needlessly on the front in a clearly losing war. We want NATO to stop enabling all of that (it literally wouldn’t be happening if they weren’t demanding that it continue). That’s what it is to be a peace activist. And I’m fairly sure I can speak for all of us, we are not pacifists, lol. But we are advocates for peace and the end to the horrible and needless loss of life.

        Nice try to completely twist reality, and completely misrepresent us, as you war mongering dronies always do.

        Edit: We actually give a shit about all the Ukrainian people being thrown into a fucking meat grinder. We care about their lives. The people who just say “more weapons to Ukraine!” do not give a shit about the lives of the people there. They’re happy to just let the war keep dragging on until the last capable Ukrainian is dead. An example of how WE feel about the tragedy of the situation: https://hexbear.net/post/503747 (hexbear link to a lemmygrad news post)

        • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Edit: We actually give a shit about all the Ukrainian people being thrown into a fucking meat grinder. We care about their lives. The people who just say “more weapons to Ukraine!” do not give a shit about the lives of the people there. They’re happy to just let the war keep dragging on until the last capable Ukrainian is dead. An example of how WE feel about the tragedy of the situation: https://hexbear.net/post/503747 (hexbear link to a lemmygrad news post)

          So be fucking outraged then that Russia started, and is continuing this war. They’re the ones killing Ukrainians in their homeland.

          A comment from that link:

          Omg, it’s a full on genocide of Ukrainian people. Just damm the Western libs… Fuck this planet.

          Russia is committing genocide. They’ve been raping and killing civilians since the start, this is where your anger and energy needs to be. Imagine being outraged at the nation defending itself from genocide, and those countries that are sending the tools that they’re being asked for to help defend themselves.

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They’ve been raping and killing civilians since the start

            You know this is not genocide, right?

            You are describing war crimes. War crimes are horrible. Two rapes are two rapes too many. Every side in every war does them, which is a major reason war is so horrific. Genocide is much more than a series of war crimes, though. To believe otherwise is to declare all sides in all wars genocidal, rendering the word meaningless.

            • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’re kidnapping Ukrainian children and trying to “re-educate” them, and given Russian soldiers have had specific orders to “kill everyone” from commanders, and video evidence of random civilians being targeted and killed, I can’t really think what else is could be? Seems like they’re trying to eradicate the Ukrainian people and their culture.

              • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                25
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’re kidnapping Ukrainian children and trying to “re-educate” them

                Let’s start with a source for this one. I’ve seen nothing akin to the indigenous boarding schools ran by the U.S. and Canada in actual campaigns to destroy a people’s collective identity. What I have seen are reports of children whose parents are not available/alive to take care of them (a fact of any war) and Russia putting them in school and/or up for adoption (something any state would do).

                • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/18/how-ukraine-kidnapped-children-led-to-vladimir-putins-arrest-warrant-russia

                  We meet just a few days before the international criminal court issued warrants for the arrest of Russian president Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, his commissioner for children’s rights, for directly supervising the atrocity of kidnapping Ukrainian children for “adoption” and “re-education” in Russia.

                  I mean it’s a pretty well known enough to trigger an international arrest warrant.

                  I’ve seen nothing akin to the indigenous boarding schools ran by the U.S. and Canada in actual campaigns to destroy a people’s collective identity.

                  Classic hexbear whataboutism response. Like I’m going to sit here and defend the horrendous crimes that happened in those boarding schools. Both things are wrong. You can be critical of Russia my man, you don’t need to defend it so aggressively.

            • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So your answer is to let an aggressor nation just happily steamroll through any country it pleases? Because down to this logic, any nation that decides to defend their homeland just cause needless bloodshed. No fighting = no deaths, but the aggressor can literally just waltz in and take whatever it wants.

              The fighting needs to stop as soon as possible

              Agreed. Every effort needs to make sure Russia leaves Ukraine ASAP. Ideally without any more deaths. But unfortunately as long as Russia continues this pointless act of imperialism, then the death toll will rise.

                • CamaradeBoina [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No the real answer is these people somehow think their constant egging on escalation instead of some sort of diplomatic resolution, won’t eventually lead inevitably to the war escaping its proxy status and evolve into a REAL inter-imperialist direct confrontation with all of what it implies (it implies nukes)

                • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If Ukraine wants to remain a sovereign nation and retain its land, then what alternative does it have? I don’t think any nation in their right mind would happily let an invader just attack without putting up a defence.

                  Russia themselves threw millions of men into the meat grinder to defeat the Nazis and so did the allies. So did the north Vietnamese against the US. It’s tragic, but it’s it’s unfortunately the reality when there’s bad actors that invade other nations.

                • teichflamme@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The joke is that what you want has been done already when Russia invaded the Krim.

                  How dumb do you have to be to think that Russia would not do the same shit again soon if Ukraine decides to do nothing?

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So your answer is to let an aggressor nation just happily steamroll through any country it pleases?

                You were happy enough to let Ukraine commit genocide until an ‘aggressor’ stopped it

                Every effort needs to make sure Russia leaves Ukraine ASAP

                So enlist. They’re out of warm bodies to throw at minefields and artillery kill zones. Instead of being so bloodthirsty with other people’s lives, put yours at risk.

                Why do you deserve to live if you want other people to die for your cause? Go die for your own cause. Go die with the rest of your nazi comrades.

                • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You were happy enough to let Ukraine commit genocide until an ‘aggressor’ stopped it

                  No? Let’s not forget that Russia massively exaggerated the numbers this, whilst simultaneously also committing atrocities themselves, and then severely ramped it up in the invasion. It hasn’t stopped, it’s got significantly worse.

                  Why don’t you go to Putin and ask him to pull out of Ukraine? Or go protest the war in Russia and build momentum to get the population to protest?

                  Go die with the rest of your nazi comrades.

                  Of course, you see all Ukrainians as Nazis. Explains why you’re so eager for Ukraine to roll over so Russia can come in take over the country and eradicate Ukraine and it’s culture.

          • Clippy [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Gaddafi’s troops are committing rape to children en masse, they have issued viagra to mass rape people since the start. this is where your anger and energy need to be. Imagine being outraged at the nation defending itself from mass rape, and those countries that are sending the tools that they’re being asked for to help defend themselves.

              • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                26
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The Lybian war was started on lies and shattered the country so I don’t care if it was “legal”. Diplomatic routes in Ukraine were tried (e.g. the Minsk Agreements) but broken by Kiev. The Crimean people overwhelmingly supported the annexation.

                • Gsus4@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  That’s all lies again too, man, but this time russia is arresting or killing anyone who dares to tell the truth.

              • Clippy [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                honestly i appreciate you attempting to engage this - truthfully, i find the entire premise of appealing to morality in a war fruitless, and my intentions in making the statement above was to imitate that this is a effect that has been repeated for many generations (whether or not it is true).

                ultimately people do things to advance their own goals & stamp out contradictions, not on the basis of morality.

                this attempt to say this is moral and that isn’t could go on until the next generation of soldiers is born - and it would be pointless because the narrative accepted will often be the media machine with the biggest wallet until some massive contradiction.

                ultimately what are your goals here, what are the perspective of the shoes of the russians and the ukrainians, what is the context etc.

                perhaps it’s as simply resolved as the issue of the jupiter missles, or perhaps peace was never going to be a option(from your stance of the “russian imperialists” or my stance that the American west desire to remain a world power).

                truthfully i am of the opinion the americans seeks to remain a world power [hence the 800 military bases around the world vs the russians 21], and will take advantage of any conflict to pose as the morally high ground in a “just war”, or proxy war in this case.

                i don’t think peace was ever an option, russia most likely sees ukraine as a staging ground for nato as it did in operation Barbarossa, or napoleon, or seeks minerals, or believes the new government is too nationalist for their own taste (why does it have to be one point?)

                all that matters is that is a war to extinguish contradictions that pose existential threats, another form of competition for capital.

                • Gsus4@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I did not appeal to morality, I stated the fact that the decision to helping the rebels in Lybia took into account every regional player given what we knew at the time. And even in that case it was counterproductive in hindsight.

                  Following international law is not about morality, it’s about being able to vaguely know what you can count on and possible consequences when you perform a military calculation or a geopolitical move.

                  If everyone just takes what they can get away with regardless of others’ interests, the future will just be a series of Iraq and Ukraine wars all over the world, particularly in Africa, Europe and Asia.

              • CamaradeBoina [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Libya today is a haven for islamic terrorism and slaver markets. Regardless of the “legality” of the NATO (mostly french and US led) intervention, it threw the entire region in outright chaos, and was enormously damaging to the working class of Lybia, but also of the entire fucking Sahel.

                • Gsus4@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Yea, in hindsight it would have been better to just let him crack down on the population to keep stability in the region, but with the information we had at the time, most African and Arab neighbours agreed that helping the rebels with a no-fly zond would be better than not to, since the civil war was going to start anyway. You don’t care about legality, but that is not the point. The point is that this was not unilateral, like Iraq, and even then military interventions can go terribly wrong.

          • fuckiforgotmypasswor [comrade/them,any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            So be fucking outraged then that Russia started and is continuing this war

            its so weird that the day the tanks rolled over the border of Ukraine history magically just began, there was no material reality prior to this event, or any geopolitical events of consequence we could connect to this outcome, certainly none that had to do with openly threatening to expand a hostile military alliance with supersonic and nuclear missiles 5 minutes from the capital city of Moscow

            i wonder if the US has ever done the exact same thing in the name of national security and what the NATO heads said about it then

            every pro NATO take is certified baby brain shit that demonstrates nothing but a lack of understanding of material reality, history, geopolitics, on top of an absolute disregard for human life, gross hypocrisy and a level of false outrage that is always directly proportional to how loudly they’re calling to escalate bloodshed

            Russia is committing genocide. “So do the humanitarian thing and send depleted uranium shells to this warzone. Slava Ukraini!!!”

            log off dude

            • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              log off dude

              No :)

              RUSSIA BEST!!! RUSSIA THE PEACEKEEPERS!!! THE HUMANITARIANS! DEFEND RUSSIA AT ALL COSTS! SPREAD ALL THE RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA!! RUSSIA CAN DO NO WRONG! POOR POOR RUSSIA HAD NO CHOICE!!

              Am I doing it right?

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No. You’re not doing it right. You’re supposed to learn what the fuck you’re talking about first. And you didn’t so now you’re having a childish tantrum at people talking back to you.

                You think they told you to log off for their benefit and not your own? That’s twice you’ve said something stupid because you didn’t know what was going on around you.

                • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They’re defending the imperialistic warmongering Russian state who are shelling and bombing civilians and who are literally creating the bloodbath.

                  I’m not the one that needs to log off. But go ahead and keep shilling for Russia.

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Adding “jailing pacifists for speaking out” to the things dronies openly support, along with forcing others to fight when they’re not willing to, poisoning civilians with generations of birth defects, and giving cluster bombs to Nazis.

        The moral high ground, ladies and gents amerikkka-clap

  • Piye@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    This news story is over a year ago, and the US locks up people all the time for political reasons