const_void to Open Source · 1 year agoFreeBSD can now boot in 25 millisecondswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up1410arrow-down115
arrow-up1395arrow-down1external-linkFreeBSD can now boot in 25 millisecondswww.theregister.comconst_void to Open Source · 1 year agomessage-square85fedilink
minus-squareJonnyRobbie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down4·1 year agoAt some point, the same could have been said with win -> linux.
minus-squareTrue Blue@lemmy.comfysnug.spacelinkfedilinkarrow-up17·1 year agoYes but the advantage of Linux over windows is obvious. It’s open source. Where’s the advantage of FreeBSD? Companies can make their own proprietary fork and give nothing back?
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThe advantages on the server side were always clear. Same with development environments for things that run on those servers.
minus-squaretheshatterstone54@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year ago Open Source More privacy More customisability Better performance More choice Better software security Features that Windows doesn’t have or is only now implementing (floating bars, file manager tabs etc.) Better command line experience Better scriptability (if that’s a word) Those are the ones I can think of off the top of my head.
At some point, the same could have been said with win -> linux.
Yes but the advantage of Linux over windows is obvious. It’s open source. Where’s the advantage of FreeBSD? Companies can make their own proprietary fork and give nothing back?
The advantages on the server side were always clear. Same with development environments for things that run on those servers.
Open Source
More privacy
More customisability
Better performance
More choice
Better software security
Features that Windows doesn’t have or is only now implementing (floating bars, file manager tabs etc.)
Better command line experience
Better scriptability (if that’s a word)
Those are the ones I can think of off the top of my head.