I start: the most important thing is not the desktop, it’s the package manager.

  • throwawayish
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Distrobox exists, so one is not bound to use a specific distro just because it packages some of the apps/binaries they require.

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Installed distrobox on NixOS because I was worried being limited to only nixpkgs and have not touched it once lol

      Same goes for the windows VM except for the time I needed to run excel macros for work

      • null@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Worried about being limited to only the biggest selection of packages available. Does not compute.

      • PracticalParrot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did on my Nix, there was a package in Nixpkgs that was outdated, so I had the opportunity to use distrobox for that, at leqst temporarily until they update the package.

        • babeuh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Here’s a graph, it should be fine for your package needs: Graph

          This is not totally accurate because nixpkgs also packages some packages that wouldn’t be in the system package manager like Python and Haskell packages. Excluding those it’s pretty much the same as the AUR

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Am I reading the readme correctly in that I can run apt-get within distrobox on Fedora, and not be limited to dnf packages?