• appel@whiskers.bim.boats
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Couldn’t access this link so used another one I looked up, but I’m not really sure what the point of this was, what they state are common features of enzymes. I suppose they are referring to how the same principles could be used to create soft robots?

    • §ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝔩ⱺɠịᵴŧOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Cytochrome p450 is one of the primary enzymes for detoxification in the liver. This study determined how it alters reaction mechanisms based only on an initial stimulus. So like a robot, it can provide a variety of functions based on its environment. One of the lead scientists in the study stated, “we have discovered that CYP450s act as soft-robot machines in ‘living matters,’ displaying a remarkable sensing and response-action capability. This is an exciting revelation, and we believe that similar mechano-transduction mechanisms of soft-impact cues might be at work in other soft-robot machines in nature.” I hope this helps make more sense of the research.

      • appel@whiskers.bim.boats
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But the initial stimulus is binding to the substrate, which then catalyses the reaction, which afaik, is how all enzymes work. I’m just wondering what is special about CYP450s in this case. Also, what are the multiple functions? Surely the entire organism itself is a better example of a soft robot

        • §ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝔩ⱺɠịᵴŧOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It has to to with the LDF repulsion and attraction. The study stated it was a 4D aspect of the CYP450s. It alters the active site to bind to different substrates depending on the toxins found in the liver.

          • appel@whiskers.bim.boats
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks for the explanation, but I still don’t quite see how this is special, afaik LDF is analogous to van der Waals force? Is this basically the same as a “loose” active site? (Ie. Can bind a range of similar substrates) Is it because the LDF force acts on an allosteric site of the enzyme and thus changes the active site? I also don’t understand their use of the term “4D”. (Sorry for being difficult, just trying to understand the significance of the paper)

            • §ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝔩ⱺɠịᵴŧOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Van der Waals is the attraction aspect of LDF, while steric repulsion is the flipside and still a part of LDF interactions. But based on the possible substrates LDF interaction with CYP450, the active site + mechanism of action will adjust to work with what’s around. Not just an allosteric aspect where a select few molecules can fit in the active site. Or at least that’s my understanding of the study’s findings.

              Edit: The 4D aspect is referencing the LDF impact on the enzymes shape and function. LDF impacts all biochem reactions, dipole and hydrophobic forces are a bigger aspect to substrate binding though. But this breaks the mold of what we thought we knew about enzymes and opens the door for a more indepth understanding of biochemical reactions.