• appel@whiskers.bim.boats
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks for the explanation, but I still don’t quite see how this is special, afaik LDF is analogous to van der Waals force? Is this basically the same as a “loose” active site? (Ie. Can bind a range of similar substrates) Is it because the LDF force acts on an allosteric site of the enzyme and thus changes the active site? I also don’t understand their use of the term “4D”. (Sorry for being difficult, just trying to understand the significance of the paper)

    • §ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝔩ⱺɠịᵴŧOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Van der Waals is the attraction aspect of LDF, while steric repulsion is the flipside and still a part of LDF interactions. But based on the possible substrates LDF interaction with CYP450, the active site + mechanism of action will adjust to work with what’s around. Not just an allosteric aspect where a select few molecules can fit in the active site. Or at least that’s my understanding of the study’s findings.

      Edit: The 4D aspect is referencing the LDF impact on the enzymes shape and function. LDF impacts all biochem reactions, dipole and hydrophobic forces are a bigger aspect to substrate binding though. But this breaks the mold of what we thought we knew about enzymes and opens the door for a more indepth understanding of biochemical reactions.