I’m helping a family member build a pc. He wanted to use Windows because “Linux can’t play games” despite me having a perfectly good gaming laptop running Linux that runs all my games, even graphically intensive ones.

2 days later, no game has been played yet. We can’t even get steam to start. I even installed Arch on a sata ssd I donated just to verify the pc parts actually work (took less than an hour). It took 1 and a half days to even get the Windows 11 installer to get past like the 3rd screen.

Fucking fuck. Dealing with all this fucking bullshit is far worse than not being able to play a few trashy anticheat pay 2 win games. The anti Linux circlejerk is real.

  • wolre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get the criticism that you still need to use the CLI for many more advanced tasks, but 11 “program install processes”? I assume you mean package managers? I only use two on Debian, apt and flatpak and don’t really see the need for anything more. If you just use a gui store like Gnome Software or Discover you don’t even see a difference between the two in the first place.

    The only time that issues arise is when you try to instal something that is not (or not properly) supported on Linux. Otherwise I’d argue the presence of a centralized store GUI even makes installing apps easier on Linux than on Windows.

    • HughJanus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get the criticism that you still need to use the CLI for many more advanced tasks

      I said basic tasks.

      I assume you mean package managers?

      No I mean different file types. Windows uses 1 (.exe) and it launches a wizard where you click “next” and it installs itself. As opposed to appimage tar.bz .db apt and whatever other file types people release for Linux that each have their own unintuitive install processes.

      Maybe 75% can be installed with package managers. Windows has had their own package manager also for a long time now.