Bug: Not GPL. :-) · Issue #834 · uutils/coreutils
github.com
Hi, I love this project, but infrastructural software really should be under the GPL. It's very important that distributed software can be fixed by the end user, which the MIT licenses & fr...

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/119645

The amount of libertarian ideology present in FOSS is shocking

Yeah, I can’t believe the shit liberals say (hehe) sometimes…

  • holdengreen@lemmygrad.ml
    4·
    2 years ago

    I was told that AGPL can be modified to make something useful. You can’t count on copyfarleft actually holding any legal weight in crapitalist countries.

    • CommunistWolf@lemmygrad.ml
      1·
      2 years ago

      SSPL is modified AGPL, so pepole are certainly trying that route. I’m not too optimistic myself.

      And yeah, if you try to play by the rules, you’ll always find the rules change on you the moment you start to achieve success. I’d file that under “this is a nice problem to have”, personally.

      • holdengreen@lemmygrad.ml
        2·
        2 years ago

        Well GPL3 holds legal weight from what I can tell. Companies don’t want to touch it… Or do they?

        It’s just that stuff like the Peer Production License is largely unproven and there isn’t a big legal framework protecting it like the FSF.

        I think there are limits to what we can realistically achieve with software licenses. The goal should be to at least minimize damage as much as possible.