Update:
The comments from this post will not be removed as to preserve the discussion around the announcement. Any continued discussions outside of this thread that violate server rules will be removed. We feel that everyone that has an opinion, and wanted to vent, has been heard.

————-

Original post:
Yesterday, we received information about the planned federation by Hexbear. The announcement thread can be found here: https://www.hexbear.net/post/280770. After reviewing the thread and the comments, it became evident that allowing Hexbear to federate would violate our rules.

Our code of conduct and server rules can be found here.

The announcement included several concerning statements, as highlighted below:

  • “Please try to keep the dirtbag lib-dunking to hexbear itself. Do not follow the Chapo Rules of Posting, instead try to engage utilizing informed rhetoric with sources to dismantle western propaganda. Posting the western atrocity propaganda and pig poop balls is hilarious but will pretty quickly get you banned and if enough of us do it defederated.”
  • “The West’s role in the world, through organizations such as NATO, the IMF, and the World Bank - among many others - are deeply harmful to the billions of people living both inside and outside of their imperial core.”
  • “These organizations constitute the modern imperial order, with the United States at its heart - we are not fooled by the term “rules-based international order.” It is in the Left’s interest for these organizations to be demolished. When and how this will occur, and what precisely comes after, is the cause of great debate and discussion on this site, but it is necessary for a better world.”

The rhetoric and goal of Hexbar are clear based on their announcement: to “dismantle western propaganda” and "demolish organizations such as NATO” shows that Hexbar has no intention of "respecting the rules of the community instance in which they are posting/commenting.” It’s to push their beliefs and ideology.

In addition, several comments from a Hexbear admin, demonstrate that instance rules will not be respected.

Here are some examples:

“I can assure you there will be no lemmygrad brigades, that energy would be better funneled into the current war against liberalism on the wider fediverse.”

“All loyal, honest, active and upright Communists must unite to oppose the liberal tendencies shown by certain people among us, and set them on the right path. This is one of the tasks on our ideological front.”

Overall community comments:

To clarify, for those who have inquired about why Hexbear versus Lemmygrad, it should be noted that we are currently exploring the possibility of defederating from Lemmygrad as well based on similar comments Hexbear has made.

Defederation should only be considered as a last resort. However, based on their comments and behavior, no positive outcomes can be expected.

We made the decision to preemptively defederate from Hexbear for these reasons. While we understand that not everyone may agree with our decision, we believe it is important to prioritize the best interests of our community.

  • odbol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    183
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have no idea who Hexbear is, but it’s well documented how th IMF and World Bank work to endebt developing countries to the US’s corporate rule and then steal all their resources… Are we… Not allowed to talk about that here?

  • PotjiePig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m not in favour of pre-emptive defederating. It feels like censorship doing so and that bothers me.

    1. Their note to their users specifically says to keep their anti establishment opinions and trolling to their own communities and don’t spread it further for fear of defederation. It hardly sounds threatening to us.

    2. Defederating can happen at any point, and I think would be better kept as a reactive response and last resort rather than proactive.

    3. The more our large instances start fracturing and closing off from one another the less useful Lemmy will become. You’re hardly blocking out an idealogy, if hexbear users wanted in they could just sign up and that would make it harder to find them. At least having them federated makes it easy to filter out @hexbear if we wanted.

    4. Practicing tolerance goes both ways. Calling communities ‘them’ vs ‘us’ and judging a group based on the noise of the few doesn’t seem like the right approach. If hexbear became a problem and moderators complained of hate speech and conflict then absolutely we use the tools we have to keep things functioning, but filtering out groups because we don’t like ‘their’ belief systems will make us judgemental and biased as a result. This is a platform to promote discussion not an echo chamber to gather like minded opinions and bounce them off each other in perpetuity.

  • kenbw2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Not in favour of this.

    I chose Lemmy.world because I wanted an instance that would federate even with people I might disagree with. If it’s illegal and abusive, sure. But to defederate on ideological grounds? I was planning a recurring donation but this makes me consider setting up my own instance.

    They’re welcome to whatever discussions they want to have on their instance. As long as they respect the rules of other instances when they’re here, then everybody wins.

    As for their point about dismantling western propaganda - if they have documented sources then let’s have a conversation. It’s not like there isn’t western propaganda

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I like your take a lot. It also sounds like lemm.ee might align with your wanted policies, if you don’t want to selfhost.

    • remkit@lemmy.kya.moe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well, it’s their instance, they can do what they want with it. You should definitely save your $ and setup your own instance so you can federate with whatever you want.

    • Dekudibusei@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      Given their outings, I don’t think you can expect them ye respect other instances’ rules. That will give mods a very hard time, which makes effective hosting of lemmy.world an issue. That’s not a good thing.

    • Cabrio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fuck that, I spend enough time arguing with ignorant uneducated fuckwits on the Internet without being exposed to a hive of wilful stupidity.

      • mimichuu_@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        11 months ago

        Then make your own instance and turn it into a safety bubble just for you. Don’t ruin it for everyone else.

        • Cabrio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          11 months ago

          Don’t like that we don’t want you here? Then make your own instance and turn it into a safety bubble just for you. Don’t ruin it for everyone else.

          • mimichuu_@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            You’re the one that doesn’t want to see us. I’m more than fine with seeing you.

            • Cabrio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              And I’m more than fine to tell you that I don’t want to see you, doesn’t mean I have a problem insulting your beligerence and stupidity, just that I prefer not to, but if you have a problem hearing that you know where the door is.

      • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hi there, potential new friend! Since these folks are willfully stupid, can I assume you’re familiar with their positions and background, and have read my books? Which one is your favorite?

        • Cabrio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Yes, they’re so wilfully stupid that they limit their understanding of social development to what they can dredge out of history and apply idealisms to reality with the willingness of authoritarians.

          • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            and apply idealisms to reality

            Marxism is a materialist philosophy, it is specifically anti-idealism. I suspect this is a case of a person that does not understand what idealism actually means in this context though so I’ll help out with a very simplified explanation:

            Idealism = the belief that human beings control their environment through the use of ideas. That humans have ideas, and then use those ideas to impact their environment.

            Materialism = the belief that human beings get their ideas from the material conditions that they find themselves in. That it is actually the environment that human beings exist in that gives them their ideas.

            Marxism is a fundamentally a materialist philosophy. Its key thinkers were viciously anti-idealism and sought to ground marxist analysis in scientific analysis, hence the nickname “the immortal science”. Liberalism on the other hand holds idealism as its core tenet and believes that if you just get enough people to change their ideas you can create change. Hence why many liberals think you can just convince the rich to go completely against their material interests with discussion rather than understanding that they hold their ideas because they are the rich, because of the material conditions they have that differ from the working class.

            • duviobaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              25
              ·
              11 months ago

              Pseudo-leftist like you tankies do not belong here or anywhere else. Go back to your wannabe-commie instance. While you are defending imperialism over there, we will be here having our fun - in reality

            • Cabrio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Idealisms in this case is referring to the attempted application of one’s ideals, not the philosophy of idealism. Materialism is a Marxist ideal for example.

              I suspect this is a case of a person that does not understand what idealism actually means

              If self awareness was a disease you’d be the healthiest person alive. Funny how you tried to throw your pseudo intellectual weight around but missed the first important step of ensuring you had adequate cognizance of the message you were responding to.

              Asking a simple question about my use of idealism, or for that matter having more than passing grasp of English, would have clued you onto your misinterpretation.

              If you had you’d have saved yourself a lot of keystrokes.

              • foggy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                18
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                And this conversation right here is why it’s a good thing we defederate.

                Conversations like this are weaponized by groups like them. It’s not a good faith attempt at reaching common ground. It’s pigeonholing arguments for dunks and upvotes in an effort to destabilize the more unified conversations that are organically arising.

          • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            You said yes but didn’t answer my question! You’ve read my books? Which is your favorite?

            • foggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              11 months ago

              Grow the fuck up. Carl Marks isn’t an author. You’re not Karl Marx, he is very dead. They’re not your books, and no one came here to have that conversation. Go somewhere else. I heard hexbear is neat.

            • Cabrio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              11 months ago

              You haven’t written any, there’s a fellow by the name of Karl Marx that has a few, and he’d be an intellectually engaging enough fellow to converse with.

              But you? You are but a pathetic wannabe facsimile with no purpose beyond a poor attempt at humerous, though disingenuous, engagement.

              • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                11 months ago

                It sounds like you get the dumb joke that is my username. Congratulations! With that in mind, perhaps you’d like to take a third try at answering a simple and relevant question?

                Have you read Karl Marx’s books? Which is your favorite?

  • toasteecup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    61
    ·
    11 months ago

    I definitely appreciate the hesitation in defederation, but I’m in favor of defeding with both hexbear and lemmygrad.

    I’ve seen more than enough “Stalin did nothing wrong posts” to know that discussions are pointless and would lead me only to frustration and a desire to drink.

  • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What the fuck?

    I was assured by this server that it has no problem with socialists. This is worse than I expected it to be, I expected a half-hearted attempt to justify this action through means other than “they’re socialists and hold socialist views”.

    To the three points here:

    1. “Western propaganda” - Is capitalist propaganda. Of course socialists oppose it, we oppose capitalism.

    2. “Nato” - An anti-nato position is held by literally every single socialist organisation in Europe. You will not find a socialist org with a pro-nato position. Ffs just look at DiEM25’s position on this, it’s probably the most well known cross-nation alliance of socialist groups and parties in europe including people like Yanis Varoufakis, Jeremy Corbyn and Zizek to name a few but that really doesn’t do the size of the DiEM organising alliance justice. Even Noam Chomsky is anti-nato ffs. What the fuck are you doing acting like this is a fringe position not held by a huge number of people over here in Europe and at the forefront of leftist politics on the continent? Taking the position “you’re not allowed to be anti-nato” is blatant american imperialism.

    3. “It is in the Left’s interest for these organizations to be demolished.” - Duh? What the fuck do the liberals running this instance think socialists believe exactly? When Marx calls for revolution do you think that we mean to continue the organisations that existed prior? No, we seek to abolish them and create new socialist organisations that serve the new socialist state we seek to create.

    Absolutely mindblowing that this instance ever pretended it was going to play nicely with socialists. I’m disgusted.

    Every single take above is also the take you will get from every single socialist community over on reddit. The anarchist communities will also even have an anti-nato position. Like jesus christ. I expected this post to be bad but I didn’t expect it to be “Yeah fuck socialists, oh and fuck what anarchists believe too”.

    I’m flabbergasted that @ruud@lemmy.world just completely lied about not intending to block based on ideology, and it’s extremely telling that Hexbear gets a pre-emptive defederation for this shit while literal actual nazis were a chore to get defederated.

  • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Gotta say, pre-emptive defederation seems like a bit of an over reaction. There’s plenty of leftists in other instances, not just hexbear and lemmygrad. Hell, I’m an anarchist that regularly comments on political/social threads in this instance, it doesn’t seem to be an issue. Lemmy in general is pretty obviously far left leaning. I don’t see the harm in federating with hexbear, unless they show themselves to be actively harassing or trolling. But you’d have to federate first to find out if they will

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      54
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because “critical of western propaganda” is a front for promoting authorianism and intolerance. The “western propaganda” they’re critical of include human rights, inclusiveness, social security etc.

      • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Every fucking “social security” that exists in the western world was achieved by those of us that wave the red flag ffs. 5 day week? Socialists. Most of your holidays? Socialists. Worker protections? Socialists. The length of your work day? Socialists. Healthcare? Socialists. Eliminating child labour? Socialists. The list goes on and on and on.

        And inclusiveness? How the fuck do you work out that the only lemmy that has visible pronouns is not inclusive? 20-30% of the userbase is trans ffs. It’s MORE inclusive that this instance which has left transphobic and hateful posts up for many hours at a time on occasion. The post that looked like a relic from r/fatpeoplehate was up for 12 hours before it got taken down.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          A prominent example you left out: American politicians and the billionaire-owned media don’t like when someone brings it up, but the man who more than anyone else has been hailed by the establishment as the embodiment of peaceful struggle for civil rights, Martin Luther King Jr, was a pro-union socialist and would have been as disgusted by the neoliberal hypocrites in charge of the Dems as the blatant racists of the far right

        • BelieveRevolt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          There’s a user down in the comments with a history of transphobic garbage bragging about not having been banned yet. Liberal inclusivity.

          • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Which union movements led to the implementation of those policies and who were the prominent leaders of the unions in those movements? Maybe look into whose blood was spilled in the streets fighting for it too.

            Linking to a wikipedia page and vaguely gesturing is functionally meaningless.

            Maybe look up the International Workingmen’s Association, and the 8 hour day movement, which followed the Nine Hours Movement of 1871–72. Or read a little about where the weekend comes from.

            • TheLurker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Ah yes the old catch cry of the commies, trying to paint the picture that labour unions are synonymous with communists parties.

              Yes, UNIONIST, not fucking communists fought and died for workers rights. You lot just latched on to it like a fucking parasites you are so you could bolster your image.

              Here is how your glorious fathers of communism “supported” trade unions. Spoiler Alert, they didn’t.

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_unions_in_the_Soviet_Union#:~:text=The trade union system in,4 to 5 million kolkhozniks.

              • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                None of those unions had liberal or conservative leaders numbnuts. They were built by socialists, just like all the new unions you’re seeing pop up today. The Amazon union? Chris Smalls? They read lenin mate.

                • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Don’t forget our militant labor anarchists as well, they also did a ton of work building up unions in the west.

                • TheLurker@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Oh really, of course you can provide evidence for this bold claim right? Oh wait, absolutely you cannot because it is a ridiculous statement which is clearly untrue.

                  Your whole premise is that communism is good and capitalism is bad. As if the world is that black and white. You sound like a first year political science student who just got done reading Manifest der Kommunistischen.

              • mimichuu_@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                11 months ago

                Labour unions are not the same as a communist party or vanguard but to claim they’re not mostly organized and consisting of socialists is just immensely naive and stupid.

                • TheLurker@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Mostly is not ALL as was the previous claim, and I’ll bet most of you don’t work, let alone done manual Labor or been in a union. So in reality you have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

              • Tabitha@fediverse.boo
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                You know you’re really arguing with an intellectual heavyweight when they keep quoting Wikipedia

                • TheLurker@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Wow great counter argument you really came with some quality material there.

                  At least I provide a source. You lot just use “trust me brah, I smoke a lot of weed”. Which is not surprising as you lot are all such massive cliches. Whining about the “corrupt capitalist pigs”, as you activatly participate in it. removed about the evils of consumerism as you down your third from Starbuck mociato, shopping on Amazon for the latest iPhone.

          • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            The welfare state was a response to the militant labor movement that had already won most of those concessions for their own members and were threatening to do a lot more. This dovetailed with a need to counter the very real welfare state pioneeted by the Soviets decades earlier.

            An easy place to begin informing yourself is to read up on FDR and where his motivations for The New Deal came from, and who he wanted to defang.

            • TheLurker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              11 months ago

              Oh here we go, FDR was a communist, is that what you are trying to imply? God damn you lot are either brain-dead or brain washed.

              If communism is so fucking great why does it fail all the fucking time hey? 🤦‍♂️

              • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                FDR was a communist,

                I’m actually implying that he was an anticommunist and that The New Deal was an attempt to mollify more radical elements, including militant labor.

                If communism is so fucking great why does it fail all the fucking time hey?

                Communist countries, i.e. those run by a communist party, have consistently punched above their weight, particularly considering the relentless attacks they face.

                For example, compare the struggles of Haiti to those of Cuba. Haiti has suffered under neocolonialism and with basically zero counterweight to the constant imperialism directed at them, including still being forced to pay debts to France for their own liberation from a slave colony and undergoing several Western-supported coups, on top of the constant drain of resources and underpaid labor that come with the territory of exploitation by international capital.

                Cuba, despite blanket sanctions and constant targeting by the global seat of capital for over half a century, provides massively better lives for its people, with better literacy and infant mortality than the US. It’s still a poor country, understandably, but it teaches a simple lesson about how international capital actually functions for imperialized countries.

                Happy to answer more questions.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is what I find absolutely crazy. I am, by and large, in agreement with socialists on economic matters. But why do they always support China and Russia? Like wtf? In what world is the genocide being committed against the Uyghur people cool? In what world is banning access to free communication including many of the largest websites worth defending? Why is it ok to lock up gay people? How is aggressively invading a neighbouring country cool? How is threatening to invade a neighbouring independent country (which has been de facto independent for over 70 years) whilst frequently flying your military into their airspace as a form of threat somehow the actions of the good guys?

        You can believe in socialist economics without needing to defend the extreme authoritarian nature of countries that pretend as though their economy runs on socialist principles (or worse, which are the explicitly non-socialist successor state to a country that formerly professed to socialism). Tankies make no fucking sense to me.

        • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          What do you mean by socialist economics?

          You’ll be hard pressed to find anyone on Hexbear (or Lemmygrad for that matter) who ‘supports Russia’ or thinks it’s ‘ok to lock up gay people’. In fact, it’s the exact opposite. If you read Hexbear’s Code of Conduct, any kind of bigotry will result in a ban: https://www.hexbear.net/code_of_conduct

        • _jonatan_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          11 months ago

          I just want to say that most communists/socialists are not in favor of china or other authoritarian “communist” regimes (any country where factories need suicide nets can hardly be called communist, even if you disregard all the other ways they fail at communist ideals).

          Unfortunately tankies are incredibly loud and often well-organized. They are just authoritarian dickriders, no better than the imperialist they claim to oppose.

          • Tabitha@fediverse.boo
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            Communists practice critical support. To quote Marx, “Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality [will] have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence.” We do not believe China’s economy is socialist. But the CPC has lifted more people out of poverty than any government in history, at the same time that living standards for the Western working class have collapsed. In so far as they support the working class, we critically support the CPC.
            What you call ‘Tankies’, is a word that has been used to associate Marxist-Leninist’s with all kinds of bizarre micro-ideologies. But Marxism-Leninism is the primary form of communism in most countries in the world, and in that sense most communists will practice critical support towards AES states.

            • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Exactly this. Even the CPC doesn’t claim to have achieved socialism yet. They don’t plan to achieve it till ~2050 (although seeing how they smash all other targets, they might get there a bit sooner).

            • _jonatan_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              11 months ago

              I can agree that getting people out of poverty is cool. But tankies generally don’t practice “critical support” of CPC. They practice unwavering boot-deepthroating. I have never heard anyone from that side of the left say (or acknowledge) anything negative about CPC. Any critiques put up is usually dismissed as “CIA propaganda”.

              • Tabitha@fediverse.boo
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                There are a wide range of views towards China among communist and amongst ourselves we argue about them a lot. The thing is, a lot of the criticisms of China that the average Westerner has, are naturally informed by the Western media. This is understandable, but it leads to criticisms that often aren’t based in reality. I don’t know how many times I’ve had someone tell me, for example, that China is a warmongering, imperialist state, when in reality they haven’t been in a war for more than half a century. So this creates the idea among non-communists that we are aligned and have a unified, uncritical front in regard to China, whereas actually nothing could be further from the truth.

              • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Echoing/adding to Tabitha’s point, it gets tedious very quickly to argue with liberals about China because they’re rarely well informed.

                Marxism stands for the ‘ruthless criticism of all that exists’ and the ‘concrete analysis of concrete conditions’. China does not get a free pass. But it’s not very productive to argue with someone who isn’t concerned with material reality in China because they’ve been led to believe falsehoods spread by liberals.

                One of the reasons you don’t see the critical side to the ‘tankie’ analysis of China is because you might never have got to the point where you’re talking about China (as opposed to what westerners think about China).

                If the ‘tankie’ has to debunk a blatant lie for the millionth time, a constructive conversation cannot follow unless the liberal is willing to move past that point. The liberal must first accept that they might be wrong and then continue the discussion beyond where it usually ends—which is usually where the liberal accuses the ‘tankie’ of arguing in bad faith for daring to investigate an issue beyond the headline.

                (Again, to caveat this, by liberal, I mean pro-capitalists, not the ‘progressive’ liberals of the US.)

          • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            most communists/socialists

            are in China and the rest of the global south.

            What passes for socialism/the ‘left’ in the US/west is ‘progressive’ liberalism. I encourage you to read the classic and modern texts of liberalism with a critical eye. Then read Marx.

            Otherwise, you could start with Zac Cope (critical of China/Marxism-Leninism).

          • Anemia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I agree, but I’m not so sure that it’s the case in the more extreme communities, otherwise those views would be downvoted/grouppressured out to a larger extent.

          • Dekudibusei@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            11 months ago

            To be fair, this sound like a Muslim decrying that ISIS doesn’t consist of “actual” Muslims. If they themselves identify as Muslims, or communists in this case, that’s what counts for me. You can’t wipe your driveway clean of that stain just by saying “meh, they’re not really communist”.

            • _jonatan_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              I do agree that’s it’s a bit of a “no true scotsman” fallacy, but on the other hand many states call them themselves “democratic” without being so. At some point you have to look at the actual ideology and see if the state lives up to it. And nearly all self-proclaimed communist states simply do not. But it doesn’t really matter if they are “real” communists or not - they are not what a lot of communists/socialist believe in and support.

        • Tabitha@fediverse.boo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          This is the real reason why Hexbear cannot be federated.
          There has been a large push to redefine Marxists Leninists as ‘Tankies’. They are this associated with bizarre, reactionary micro-ideologies, uninformed cliches about supporting Russia, etc.
          Any interaction with hexbear users would quickly dispel such ideas.
          Communists do not ‘support’ Russia, - the Russian oligarchic state represents everything they despise. But these are people who are highly engaged with politics. And their worldview is a lot more nuanced than the average person, who doesn’t have any particular interest in politics and so will only pickup the general gist of mainstream narratives, and accept them without much criticism.
          So for example, in relation to Russia, while Marxists do not support their war in Ukraine, they do recognise that Russia was baited into that war by the West, and by a Ukranian state that was captured by a minority of far-right fascists following the Maiden revolution. That is geopolitical realism, and has nothing to do with ideology. No Marxist supports the economic system or cultural bigotry of modern Russia.
          Socialism naturally aligns with the humanist value systems that most people hold, and which Western countries claim to uphold even as their actions contradict them. It is essential for those who would uphold the status quo to shut out socialist voices and paint them as extremists. Your confusion - ‘why would people who extol equality and tolerance support inequality and intolerance?’ - is really answering your own question. They don’t.

          • BURN@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            Russia was not baited into a war. They attacked a sovereign nation and expected no resistance.

            This is why it’s a good thing that LW is defederating.

            • mycorrhiza they/them
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Even in the 90s, analysts understood that Russia viewed NATO expansion as an existential threat. Now missiles on the border can strike Moscow in 5 minutes. America nearly invaded Cuba under similar circumstances, during the Cuban missile crisis. The missiles were withdrawn from Cuba before that could happen.

          • mimichuu_@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            11 months ago

            Just because you redefine a narrative in Russia’s favour as “nuanced” doesn’t mean you’re now somehow not saying pretty much exactly what Russia wants you to think and say. Same for all the defenses of China and Vietnam.

            • Tabitha@fediverse.boo
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I honestly don’t know what your trying to say. Do you imagine socialists care whether their views are supposedly to the benefit of one or another capitalist country? Our views are not informed by the interests of capitalist countries full stop.

              • mimichuu_@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                What I’m trying to say is, if you push rhetoric that supports and subscribes to a state’s narrative, that doesn’t change no matter how nuanced or informed you say your rhetoric is. The effects of it are the same.

        • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          China lifted hundreds of millions of people from poverty in one generation. This is pretty impressive.

          • Anemia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            11 months ago

            You can do good things and bad things at the same time. What I find funny is people complaining about censorship and at the same time support states like Russia and China, their extreme censorship goes hand in hand with the authoritarian rule.

            • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              Censorship in China does not have an impact on my life, or on the life of most people here. Let the Chinese people be the judge of what happens in China.

              On the other hand, censorship here matters a lot to us.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                I’m sure it doesn’t have an impact on your life… if you agree with whatever the government does.

                • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I don’t live in China. But I live in a country where there are millions of refugees fleeing America’s wars.

              • Anemia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                That may be true but it should be considered before defending China in a conversation. Otherwise it would be like me advocating social justice and at the same time defending the Iranian government. All I’m saying is freedom of speech goes together with China like oil with water. But if you don’t really defend China then my comment doesn’t really apply.

                That being said I do tentatively (don’t really know the content of hexbear) disagree with defederating.

        • planish@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          My view of the socialist position on China is that it is not “the Chinese state is good”, but rather “stop being mean to Chinese people”.

          China is an empire, and socialists hate empires. But the US is also an empire (in that there’s a core that gets all the good stuff and a periphery that gets the good stuff extracted from it, which for the US is often places not technically in the country but in practice obligated to listen to it). So when the US comes in all scandalized and decides that what we really need to do to save people from the Chinese empire is to make sure that US companies don’t lose market share in GPU computing, and can manufacture solar panels at competitive prices, and that people get their short videos from Instagram Reels and not TikTok, the socialists are very suspicious. The net result looks a lot more like imperial protectionism and/or racism than a coherent anti-imperial program.

          I’m not sure why this ends up as a socialist talking point? Maybe because the nonsense of the policies seems obvious? Maybe because it seems like warmongering and wars are terrible and so it must be stopped at once? Maybe just to get a break from telling people that they should probably make sure people have houses?

          • queermunist she/her
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            My view of the socialist position on China is that it is not “the Chinese state is good”, but rather “stop being mean to Chinese people”.

            As a socialist, my view is that China is the lesser evil compared to American hegemony

            • planish@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m not sure it’s feasible to try and compare the two in an objective way. It’s easy to know which oppressive empire one personally prefers, but trying to actually reach consensus on which was better or worse using some kind of convincing evidence would be so complicated that it would probably amount to a waste of everyone’s time.

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I am, by and large, in agreement with socialists on economic matters. But why do they always support China and Russia? Like wtf?

          Socialist covers a pretty wide swath of political ideologies. Some of them buy into the old propaganda that Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Xi, etc, were actually on the right track, and that we can only achieve some sort of utopia with extreme authoritarianism first. They’re generally no better than people on the right who fall into the Trump cult of personality. There’s a lot of denial on both sides.

          The type of Socialists that are generally more sane and denounce those dictators for the monsters they were are the the Libertarian-Left ideologies, like Anarchists.

          • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            11 months ago

            This is a gross mischaracterisation. Please read Socialism: Utopian and Scientific by Engels. This is the basis of Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Xi, etc’s thought: all these figures are Marxist-Leninists, who reject the idea of utopia. Everything is contradiction. The Marxism you refer to, which is mainly Marxism-Leninism, is not teleological.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          Far from all socialists are tankies but yeah, tankies are a maddening bunch of hypocrites for sure!

        • guriinii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m pretty socialist and incredibly anti-authoritarian, so seems odd to me that socialist societies are pretty authoritarian. It should be the other way but I guess power hungry arseholes corrupt everything

          • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            What do you mean by socialist? You support someone like e.g. Bernie Sanders, or?

            • guriinii@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              Free health care, free education, social housing. Things like energy, food and water not to be profited.

              I know of Bernie Sanders but don’t know much about him.

              • mycorrhiza they/them
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s social democracy — capitalism with safety nets. Socialism implies that workers control the means of production.

        • GameGod@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          11 months ago

          They always say the same opinions because it’s part of a massive astroturfing campaign by Chinese and Russian state actors. They’re both attempting to sow discord in the West and lay the foundation to ramp it up to interfere in the 2024 US election.

          Do you remember what a shit show Reddit became in 2016? We’ve seen this exact pattern before, where a deluge of people with the same carefully calibrated opinions on everything appear out of the blue. They want to create the illusion that there’s some popular movement towards all these inane opinions, and you can even see from the comments on this thread. They’re using the same known troll tactics to push this (eg. “Just asking questions”).

          This a good test of Lemmy’s moderation and federation model and will be indicative of how it fairs next year when these campaigns really ramp up. Good on the admins for taking this seriously and nipping it in the bud.

      • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        a front for promoting authorianism and intolerance

        Like defederating from an instance whose user-base appears to have different views to one’s own.

        The “western propaganda” they’re critical of include human rights, inclusiveness, social security etc.

        You won’t find a single leftist who doesn’t argue vociferously for these things. It is the essence of being a leftist. It’s what unites them even when they disagree theoretically about the exact root of a problem and of how to uphold them. What they criticise is the idea that these things are possible under capitalism. Any cursory—critical—reading of human rights literature or liberal theory will reveal this. What you’re missing, if this is your interpretation of radical thought, is class analysis. If you are interested in the contradiction between capitalism and inclusivity, you could start with Marta Russell, Capitalism and Disability: Selected Writings.

        In this context, where the discussion is about Hexbear, you only have to read their Code of Conduct: https://www.hexbear.net/code_of_conduct:

        • We are committed to providing a friendly, safe and welcoming environment for all, regardless of gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, personal appearance, body size, race, ethnicity, age, religion, nationality, or other similar characteristic.
        • Do not use homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, and other reactionary aliases or other nicknames. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudice. …
        • We will ban you if you insult, demean or harass anyone. That is not welcome behavior. This is distinctly different than ribbing or grilling someone. …
      • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The society that spent the last 20 years in a murder spree in the Middle East does not get to lecture anyone about intolerance.

        How many countries has America invaded in your lifetime? How many murders have American thugs committed?

        • TheLurker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ah yes, not unlike your glorious Soviet overlords right? I mean they have never invaded a middle eastern country and indiscriminately killed men, women and children.

          That’s the thing about you communists, you seem to only ever remember the shit others have done and not your own.

            • TheLurker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              18
              ·
              11 months ago

              Ah yes, ignore the point and try to argue something irrelevant.

              Communism is a shitshow and has been every time someone tried to implement it. The Soviets literally littered Afghanistan with “toy bombs” in order to mame children in order to try and clog up medical camps and prevent people from fighting them. So yeah, we can stand on the high ground here because we didn’t do that shit.

              Capitalism sucks, but it has an objectively better track record on human rights, human development and social inclusiveness than ANY example of communism throughout history.

                • TheLurker@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  And remind me, what are the top ten countries with the highest rankings in life expectancy, education, safety, personal freedom and personal wealth?

                  Here let me make it simple, none of them are communist and none ever have been.

                  That abstract may as well read as communist fan fiction. Because 100% their “socialist” examples are all democratic capitalist nations.

                  That’s the thing about the USA, they don’t know what socialism really is. So any country with public health care gets call “socialist”.

              • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                This is nonsense.

                How many countries has America invaded in your lifetime?

                The point is that America is a murderous nation.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, you’re thinking of (and listening to, by the looks of it) western propaganda institutions such as the John Birch Society, the Republican Party and the Democratic Party neoliberal leadership 🙄

      • CarlMarks@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        The authority of the working class and intolersnce for Nazis, sure.

        Re: human rights, inclusiveness, and social security: bullshit. Not even on the same planet at those who bring skepticism towards hegemonic propaganda narratives, and particularly from a socialist perspective, i.e. the preemptively banned instance.

          • BelieveRevolt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            Let me guess, your examples are Finland and Sweden, two countries that have been gradually dismantling their welfare states for decades?

              • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Achieved by the ideology of the very people you’re currently suppressing. All you’re doing is moving this community hard-right, alienating the left by saying “this is not for you”.

                How do you think this discussion is gonna go down every single time this community ever gets linked anywhere now? It’s gonna be “the community that banned socialists” and it’s gonna attract the neoliberals and the far right as a result while ensuring everyone that leans remotely left says “oh, fuck that then”. It’s a completely shortsighted move for the future of the instance. It’s going to have nazi bar syndrome.

                As soon as we had that PM where you said “survival of the fittest” to me I knew something was up. You literally quoted Thatcherite/Ayn Randian philosophy to justify selectively not intervening in name squatting and community theft, a move that completely fucked over this instance’s potential to work with any subreddit modteams in further hastening the reddit migration. Livid that I was led on by this place to begin with.

                • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Oh you mean that time where you asked me to remove the current mod from !gamingcirclejerk@lemmy.world? Where you asked me to either add you as a topmod or rename the existing one because you were the moderators of that community on Reddit?

                  I told you to pick it up with the current one or to create it on another instance. I said that with your entire reddit community behind you you would quickly become to bigger “gamingcirclejerk” without me having to intervene. It was in that context that I called it “survival of the fittest” of communities on instances. Nothing too philosophical about that.

                  Feel free to post our entire conversation here.

            • Cabrio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Is that the best you’ve got? Systems that have been “gradually dismantled for decades” but still provide a higher quality of life for their citizens than not just the US but every single authoritarian government. Also the list is a lot bigger than two countries.

              Do you practice being this stupid or does it come naturally?

              • Tabitha@fediverse.boo
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                What on earth are you on about? The USSR provided guaranteed housing and employment for all citizens. Cuba has a world-class universal health system despite more than half a century under economic sanctions. China will exceed the living standards of the Western working class within this generation. And the “welfare” states of the West, even before they were dismantled, were only possible under capitalism because of the enormous wealth that the West had accrued by economic imperialism.

                • Cabrio@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  How’s that USSR working out?

                  Yes, Cuba, a country that despite not having the ability to exploit ‘the global south’ still has better health and happiness than “exploitative” countries, refer to my last point from the rest of the conversation below that you chose to ignore, you’re agreeing with me.

                  China has just been through the harshest pandemic lock down of all countries and still failed to avoid economic suffering, are you really so ignorant to think their populace is happy? The same populace with 24% unemployment in the under 25 age bracket? The same populace under the boot of an authoritarian leader that disallows dissent?

                  Do you practice being this stupid or does it come naturally?

              • BelieveRevolt@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I mean, that’s the best the West has got. Everywhere else, social security is considerably worse and means-tested. Plus, both have got right-wing governments that aren’t exactly fans of social security: the last right-wing Finnish government introduced an ”activation” system for unemployment which was so bureaucratic a lot of people’s benefits were cut for not being able to jump through arbitary hoops, and they’re bringing a similar system back, as well as cutting many, more focused benefits. What @Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world said also applies here, since the whole welfare state only exists due to the CIA funding social democrats during the Cold War as a counter to socialism.

                There’s many more factors to consider than whether or not a country is AuThOrItArIaN. A country living off the backs of the global south can give its citizens a better standard of living than countries in the global south? Surprised Pikachu.

                • Cabrio@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I mean, that’s the best the West has got.

                  Are you sure? And yet, even if it is, it’s still providing better quality of life for more citizens than anything that came before it.

                  Plus, both have got right-wing governments that aren’t exactly fans of social security

                  You mean there’s a number of voters that would vote for non-socially democratic parties and that those parties would try to dismantle socialised institutions? Surprised Pikachu.

                  You are aware that there’s idiots voting for anti-social parties in even the most socially advanced countries too right, you’re not just disingenuously blaming the ineffectualities of the system on those that support it, right?

                  What does the CIA have to do with the anti-social masses in all the other countries around the world? Doesn’t take a psyop campaign to find authoritarian morons.

                  There’s many more factors to consider than whether or not a country is AuThOrItArIaN

                  Yeah, like how their populace votes.

                  A country living off the backs of the global south can give its citizens a better standard of living than countries in the global south?

                  No shit. Just like a country that engages in good faith democratic representation and supports social services can also provide better healthcare and happiness index ratings than the US, Russia, and China.

        • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Think of it like a social contract. If you don’t play by the “rules”, you’re not protected by those same “rules”. If someone is intolerant, it’s silly for that person to expect people to extend them the same courtesy that they themselves refuse to extend to others. Hypocritical, too.

          It’s kind of like the free speech thing. Maybe you could talk about grass for days on end, but that wouldn’t mean that anyone would have to listen to you talk about grass for days on end.

          • masterairmagic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            For these racists folks anyone who is not a Westerner is subhuman. Their voices do not matter. They should shut up and know their place.

            You are the intolerant one.

      • Kalcifer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Be that as it may, why should people be prevented from questioning it? Isolating people does not make them better informed. Conversation does. All that isolation accomplishes is creating echochambers --which only serves to strengthen their beliefs.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          why should people be prevented from questioning it?

          They aren’t and they aren’t even being prevented from doing it on this very instance. There’s pleny of anti-western and anti-capitalist sentiment in here, particularly from lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml. My take away on this is that the Admins are defederating from hexbear due to their stated plan to propagandize the shit out of every instance in the fediverse. Who wants to deal with a coordinated army of tankies coming from another instance?

  • endlessmichael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    I have lurked here for a long time, but I just don’t understand the logic here. I read the statement that was linked here, and it just seemed like they were saying that they should be respectful and follow our rules? … Isn’t dismantling propaganda… through “informed rhetoric” a good thing? Why are NATO, the IMF or World Bank automatically good? … Aren’t we just creating a bubble by preemptively blocking a large lemmy instance just because we don’t like their political speech? As far as I can tell they aren’t promoting racism or bigotry. Has lemmy.world preemptively banned nazi or right-wing instances?

  • Outcide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    11 months ago

    Personally, I’d rather just block the stuff I don’t like rather than have lemmy.world trying to decide “who’s worthy of federation”.

  • nednobbins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    What have they actually done?

    I’m all for defederating from instances that cause problems but all the quotes above basically seem to say, “I know you want a revolution but you still gotta follow the rules of whatever instance you’re posting on.”

    It’s your server so your under no obligation to provide a reason for defederating beyond disagreeing with them but it leaves me wondering if there’s anything else or if it’s just a matter of disliking them?

  • eluri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    11 months ago

    I just think it’s funny how exploding heads took lots of polling and hand wringing before defederation and socialists get defederated on sight. I also think we should add “This is an expressly pro-NATO instance” to the front page, so people realize this before they make an account here.

  • GreenCrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    75
    ·
    11 months ago

    Good. I commented earlier about how horrible hexbear was. I signed up for hexbear, hoping to meet leftists, but these are not leftists. They just parrot Chinese/Russian propaganda. They have no original takes, no critical thinking. Call me whatever, but, I’m pro NATO. I don’t give a shit about what bullshit propaganda you show me from a totalitarian regime. If the U.S. is bad, then the CCP is pure evil.

  • Ignacio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    As a leftist can I just say how cringe it is to treat “fighting liberalism on the fediverse” like it’s activism? Go outside.

  • gon [he]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    11 months ago

    IDK, I don’t think this is the right move at all… The announcement post and the comments you pointed out were cherry-picked and misinterpreted. They are an ideological instance. You wouldn’t say blahaj.zone is trying to “spread” LGBTQ+ “ideas”. They’re just a specifically queer instance.

    Everything Hexbear said was, the way I read it, in the direction of “let’s behave and be good with the federation”. I think you’re just confounding your own ideologies, and the way you think things should be done, with what the community at large wants.

    That being said, IDC that much, but I do disagree.

    PS: Posting from my lemm.ee account because this post doesn’t show up on my lemmy.world account for some reason.