• merthyr1831
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago
    1. create an overvalued and exorbitantly expensive AI industry

    2. get shit on by a chinese competitor for a fraction of the money

    3. immediately ban all of the technology to replicate their breakthrough, and ban all access to the technology directly

    4. ???

    5. all my apes global hegemony gone

  • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    lol

    For anyone that has some time on their hands you can set up a Paper Trade account for free on TradingView and invest your monopoly fake money into stocks (like NVDA or why) and watch realworld news and events impact your “investment”. It’s a fun way to see capitalism in action.

    Here’s NVIDIA taking a huge fucking shit on the news that Deepseek is coming to kick their ass, riiiiggggtttt around the time OpenAI was on their knees in front of Trump begging for another half trill to get them through the next little gulley 😂

  • Feinsteins_Ghost [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s a LOT of monies tied up in US AI.

    Enough that folks are losing their asses over this. Of course the purse holders want their fucking coin. The fix isn’t in yet, but it’s OTW.

  • Speaker [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lmao, this writer is surely directly paid by the State Department. The other article linked at the end of this one is “unnamed sources (some of them not white, allegedly!) claim that the R1 thinking knows the Truth about Red China, but the Seeseepee demands the machine censor itself”. Do not interrogate why the Evil Repressive State would demand the final result be censored but have nothing to say about the equally visible “thinking” process! Eat the slop!

  • blame [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    i think we should probably separate in our minds a ban from like an organization telling its employees not to use a thing. ChatGPT is “banned” at my workplace but I am able to use local LLMs because they dont want me sending shit to OpenAI. If the navy has a halfway good security posture it should have some list of sanctioned LLMs people are allowed to use because who knows what some random company is doing with what you send to their API.

    this article is not very good in other words

    • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The US Navy doesn’t have a great track record at even basic fucking opsec per se. See here; A Navy officer is demoted after sneaking a (Starlink) satellite dish onto a warship to get the internet

      You’d think the best just the BEST military power in the world on a ship full of communications gear and detection doodads would have something in place to track in-house signals that aren’t good for the cause type of thing. Maybe I’m a keener or whatever.

      • merthyr1831
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Reminds me of when American bases across Syria were mapped out in extreme detail because morons kept using strava to track their runs around their highly classified military compounds