• chaospatterns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I tried self hosting Pixelfed but gave up because it wouldn’t work. I’m used to Docker containers that are able to just start up by themselves, but the guide didn’t work for me. Maybe it’s time to try again.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Make sure you use a MariaDB or MySQL database. Despite what the (very incomplete) docu says, Postgres support is broken.

  • Shatur
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Happy to see!

    I wondering what caused such jump.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Because news broke that Meta lobbied for the TikTok ban. So people are now boycotting Meta platforms like Facebook and Instagram. Since Pixelfed is an Instagram clone and recently launched the app, it has gained a ton of popularity. The timing of the app launch honestly couldn’t have been better, because it gave all of the fleeing Instagram users a nice convenient place to land.

    • Mechanite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I just signed up after seeing an article saying links to the website are being blocked by Instagram (IIRC). I figured it must be worth looking into if they’ve gone that far

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        I think it’s been out for a while.

        Anyways, when I try to log into the main recommended server (where I already have an account), before I even get to the login page, it gives me this error

        Which is a pretty funny thing for the official app to say about the official main instance 🤣

        Instead I just installed the PWA from the browser. It works ok.

  • rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Lies, damn lies, and graphs that don’t have the Y-axis starting at 0.

    10% growth in a day is nice, but far from a revolution. Let’s see this trend going for a month.

    • morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      the head dev Dan Sup mentioned the number of active users jumping from 6k to 30k. we’ll see how it holds, but there is strength in numbers, people only stay if other people see what they post there. i have good hopes and really want to ditch instagram

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’ve never been on IG but I’m strongly considering a pFed account. Am I churn or am I miniscule net-new?

        And yeah, it’s a hope that the rumoured meta toxicity is somehow magically not on pFed. I wanna see my nephew’s designs and art but not the influencerati junk I fear is on the captive platform.

        • aasatru@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I don’t think anyone here is arguing that the entire world will be using pixelfed by the end of the year, and that its usage will expand to other galaxies by the end of the decade.

          It’s a comment about the current growth curve, and it is both accurate and interesting.

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Lemmy had the same jump in numbers during the Reddit Exodus. Mastodon had a huge boost when Elon bought Twitter.

            Every spike has been a followed by a slide back to baseline in less than a couple of months. After you’ve seen it happen so many times, it is no longer interesting.

            • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I don’t think that either Mastodon or Lemmy slid back anywhere near as far as back to baseline? Sure, usage went down, perhaps even significantly compared to the peaks, but I think that both retained a lot more users than they had before their respective spikes. I’m an example of someone who came into Mastodon with the Twitter exodus and into Lemmy with the Reddit exodus, and I’ve stayed for both.

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                I don’t mean that the numbers went exactly back where they were. I mean that every spike was followed by a steady decline.

                Compare it with Bluesky now, or compare it with Reddit during Digg’s meltdown. Their growth curves will look like an S-curve, not this series of discrete jumps followed by 40-60% loss.

            • Kichae@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Cool. You… don’t have to engage in discussions that bore you. Why waste your time?

            • aasatru@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              27
              ·
              7 hours ago

              The fact that you believe these platforms were the same before and after these events makes it sound like you were not, in fact, there to see it happen. In my experience, it permanently changed both platforms, transforming them from weird niche sites to genuine alternatives.

              That said, what you find interesting or not is not any of my business.

                • aasatru@kbin.earth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Yeah, I know I shouldn’t bother. I am just annoyed by the misconception that all graphs should always start in 0 on the Y axis, as if it was some law of nature. Shouldn’t allow myself to get dragged in further. :)

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                I am here since before the Reddit backout and I am on Mastodon since 2018. Lemmy was at 15k MAU, went up to over 125k and now is 1/3 of that. Mastodon had 1M 575k something before Elon, hit up close to 2M 1.5M and now is sitting around 800k. (edit: I was looking at the overall charts and used wrong figures. Corrected now.)

                Sure, if your reference point is waaaay before the spikes then what we have now seem “a lot”. However, my point is that these spikes are far from being indicative of mass adoption.

                • porous_grey_matter
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Lemmy was at 15k MAU, went up to over 125k and now is 1/3 of that.

                  So it increased by 200%

                • xapr [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Mastodon had 1M something before Elon, hit up close to 2M and now is sitting around 800k.

                  This stat is really surprising. Do you by any chance have a link where I can see this data?

    • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The y axis starting zero does not change the fact that it’s exponentially growing right now. Filter that link posted below for 120 days and it is still a nearly straight vertical line of growth.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s not exponentially growing. At best, the growth rate has exponentially increased. These are VERY different things.

        It was exponentially growing, the platform would come screeching to a halt and crash.

        • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Jesus fucking Christ, you people are miserably pedantic. Nothing about my original post is wrong, so please kindly shut the fuck up with your “well achtually” takes.

            • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              They seem to be serious. The more concerning thing is that people are agreeing with them. I guess common sense is not so common.

              • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I got the same criticism about a similar graph a while ago. Numbers are on the left, people can clearly see how big of a change the graph shows, and I have no way to present the graph differently as it’s straight from the website, but people still want to argue about it

                • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  31 minutes ago

                  Tbf graphics like that are commonly used to be deceitful, because people don’t actually check the numbers on the left.

                  But in this case I think it probably doesn’t matter lol

          • M137@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Ah, the classic response to being proven wrong on the Internet. Have a hissy fit like a 5-year-old and call everyone pedantic etc. You were objectively wrong but there’s no problem with that, everyone is wrong about stuff all the time, the difference is how you handle that. You either act like a mentally grown person and just go “oh, damn, I didn’t know that, thanks for correcting me” or act like you’ve done. No one is out to say that pixelfed isn’t growing, but you’re misrepresenting facts and then being a fucking child about being told so.

            • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              33 minutes ago

              Actually, pedantry is correcting people for things that didn’t actually need correcting because everyone understood the meaning from the context, so there isn’t any reason for him to thank you because you didn’t actually do anything of value.

            • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I’m not calling everyone pedantic. I’m calling you and the other guy who chimed in with pedantic takes pedantic. You can claim you’re right all you want, but nothing about the title of the post “Pixelfed user count has gone vertical” is inaccurate. Whether it’s the user count or the user growth rate that is exponential is irrelevant. Nothing about my post is misrepresenting the fact that on the graph, the number of users is going nearly straight up, exactly as the title describes. Feel free to keep trying to correct me, but I know I’m right because I have eyes and can identify basic shapes. I am very willing to admit when I am wrong, but this is not one of those cases.

      • aasatru@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The only thing worse than misrepresentation of statistics is completely misguided criticism of statistical representation.

        While we’re at it, the X axis doesn’t start at zero either.

        • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It’s the perfect combo of karma farming and “well, achtually” to make your blood boil. Good thing karma isn’t a thing on here from what I can tell.

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    To be fair, the Y-Axis doesn’t start from zero.

    That being said, 10% account growth in 2 days is pretty solid. Let’s hope both account creation and engagement metrics (MAUs/DAUs) keep growing.

    EDIT: Correct Axis type.

    • lemmydripzdotz456@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Pedantic: You mean Y-axis, right? Technically, neither start at zero but I think you meant Y based on context.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I actually wish this were true. Sure, they would show the snippet for the time we care about, but they MUST provide the source graph that contains all data back to the Big Bang. Specifically the Plank Era, we don’t want a graph where time doesn’t exist, that would make the graph useless.

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes, of course the Y axis.

        I work with charts/vizualizations/data a lot, but for whatever reason I reflexively mistake X/Y a lot. It’s not even funny.

        • aasatru@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I make the same mistake all the time for some reason, though I know which is which. I have a theory the reason is that the X axis is often used to plot years (Y), which messes with my brain ever so slightly.

          That said, I don’t think the Y axis should necessarily start in zero in a graph that seeks to show the pattern of growth rather than the number of users in absolute terms. If anything, a longer X axis would have been more useful, in order to show how unusual such a growth pattern is.

          • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            This is like a weird personal thing that I can’t even explain. For whatever reason, the Y axis becomes labelled as X in my mind in random situations. And I use charts (and other data visualizations a lot).

            The funny thing is when I am thinking of X, I don’t have this urge to call it Y. If I am looking at horizontal, X is the first thing that comes to mind. But not with Y.

    • Sabin10@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Isn’t that a 1‰ growth or am I mathing wrong?

      Edit: I’m wrong and that’s why I shouldn’t comment first thing in the morning. The math is mathing, I’m just not braining.

    • past@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Starting the y-axis zero wouldn’t change the shape of the curve at all, but it would make the increase seem less dramatic.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s a ~10% increase, but the scale makes it look like the count shot up by 10x at first glance. I know that’s why you always need to look at the axis labels, but graphs like this are purposely presented this way because they’re easy to misinterpret for the average person.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Just a FYI, Dan who made Pixelfed also does Loops and a few other Fedi projects in case people want more cool stuff to play with.

    • bishbosh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      What is the general outlook on others helping him build them out? I would hate to see tons of the energy dissipate because it was one guy trying his damnedest to out compete tech companies on two fronts.

  • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I don’t really use Instagram, but I might give Pixelfed a try. Does anyone know if it’s also a left-wing echo chamber like Lemmy?

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I signed up, though I generally don’t like following individuals and much prefer groups or communities like Lemmy. Gotta support independent social media.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What are you supposed to put in the “server url” field in Pixelix? I put the instance I have an account on, because I don’t have any other information that would make sense to put there, but nothing happens when I tap the arrow.

    Also, what the fuck, fediverse. It’s exactly this kind of bullshit that’s why nobody joins you. Fix it for Christ’s sake. Something this unintuitive doesn’t even belong in a beta build. If I was a paid instagram plant making this app to frustrate people into going back to instagram, this is the splash screen I’d use. Stop making it impossible to recommend you in good faith to people I like.

    • korendian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I don’t know about that app specifically, but I know some fediverse apps do not have all instances in their directory. For example, fedilab doesn’t have friendica.world. I would suggest hunting around for an app that supports your instance, but I agree, it is a dumb problem. What is the point of being able to join whatever instance you want if it is not listed on the app?