• Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Mods are sad that this isn’t reddit where their communities are their own little fiefdom

    • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      As I understand, It was a move intended to inspire discussion rather than having overreaching moderators knee-jerk remove posts/comments. It just wasn’t worded properly.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Yeah. Like, I do understand 100% that if someone says something in good faith, even if it’s disagreeable or stupid, and not harmful, is there really a point in removing it? Although , even then, I got banned from politicalhumor for “racism” for posting the following meme:

        1000060888

        It was in a comment section and my joke was that Joe Biden legalised abortion. However they must have thought that I was posting it unrionically and was seriously claiming that Obama was a Muslim based on him being black, even though that it should be obvious that even the creator of the meme was parodying Facebook grandmothers

        • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m pretty sure you should have been allowed an appeal. I believe it’s a “bylaw” of lemmy. Next time you feel you’ve had a comment unfairly removed or you’ve been banned for something you feel wasn’t worthy of a ban, reach out to a moderator of that community and just ask.

          We’re not Reddit. Sometimes, misunderstandings happen.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Tankie mods on world are criticized for being too tankie in moderation.

    Admins try to address this by forcing mods to argue instead of immediately ban if something is posted against their beliefs.

    A non-tankie mod thinks it is bullshit that they have to engage in every online argument in good faith and takes their subs (I know this isn’t the official term but it communicates the idea) dark in protest.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      While I don’t agree with the ‘tankie’ rhetoric (it’s been thrown around so much that word has no meaning here), mod abuse has definitely gotten out of control across most online communities.

      It’s opening up an opportunity for communities that don’t tolerate mod abuse to flourish.

      The mods only have themselves to blame. Hopefully these new communities won’t repeat the same mistakes.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is going to be a learning experience for mods and admins on Lemmy. It took years for Reddit to cobble together a governance structure and, even then, it was really bad. I haven’t seen the devs take any stance on building tools to help and we’ve seen a lot of cases where mod abuse have been defended by admins.

        This seems to be a first stab at admins taking a proactive approach to mod abuse. It is a bad policy, but at least they seem like they are trying to do something.

      • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why are right wingers the only ones who ever try to devalue the meaning of words?

        If they don’t like being called tankies or nazis they are free to chage their beleifs, same as you if you feel like you are being grouped in for your beliefs.

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          We’re going to allow some “flat earth” comments. We’re going to force some moderators to accept some “flat earth” comments

          Yup, when I think of tankies I think about the flat earth conspiracy. 🙄

              • tht@social.pwned.page
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                One Belives the shape of the earth is a lie, and all governments on earth collaborate to keep the lie alive, the other wants everyone’s needs to be met

                • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  24 hours ago

                  Tankies want to put minorities in camps as a distraction from real policy while they give money to rich people.

                  At least that’s what all the politicians they support want.

                  Im sure all their supporters aren’t that malicious, but that’s who they vote for.

          • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            This shows you clearly don’t understand what was implied by what was said. “Flat earth” is a placeholder term to imply “random nonsense conspiracy theory.” Nothing more.

            The idea is that instead of instant removal/ban, we are encouraged to debate and draw out through discussion, the reason why it’s bullshit.

            I’ll agree that the change suggested is a bit confusing in it’s wording, but simultaneously, it was also misinterpreted by knee-jerk reactionaries to mean what they needed it to mean to result in the outrage they crave.

            • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              I agree with this, as long as lines are drawn at the kind of conspiracy theories of “homosexuality is a mental illness”, and the like. I want to make a point that this would pertain to memes as well.

              This is the time to draw clear lines, because we are deciding the tone/direction of one of the largest instance in Lemmy.

              With the timing being suspiciously close to Meta’s clearly bigoted “relaxation” of the mod rules, this brings with it a bad feel, but let’s remember, the fediverse is just growing and taking shape, so this was inevitable (and many of us have been watching it unfold). But we have to remember that we shape it, unlike the corporate shit we left. Make your voices heard.

              Edit:

              I agree with this, as long as lines are drawn at the kind of conspiracy theories of “migrants are ruining our country homosexuality is a mental illness”, and the like. I want to make a point that this would pertain to memes as well.

              I made this change because I believe banning things that are subjective quashes debate.

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 hours ago

              What I understand is the new rules are to force us to deal with random nonsense conspiracy theories. We are encouraged to have drawn out discussions with concern trolls who should just get banned. Do you have any idea how long a troll can draw out a discussion while still remaining polite? It’s fun for them to make us patiently explain to them that the Earth is round.

              • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                You’re not being encouraged to have drawn out discussions with trolls. WE (mods) are encouraged to not insta-ban or knee-jerk remove content just because it might lie within a grey area of what we consider trolling, like other instances do from time to time. If someone is blatantly trolling, which is usually obvious- we remove the content, but if not and it’s just an unpopular opinion/conspiracy theory, the idea is that it should remain and be debated with facts and shut down via discourse rather than a heavy hand.

                Also… This is not an all encompassing be-all-end-all rule. It’s nuanced. VERY nuanced. Again, no one is forcing you to have to deal with nonsense. You also have the option to not react to people you believe is trolling in bad faith, and report them if you feel they are brewing the rules.

                Hope this clears some of it up.

                • queermunist she/her
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 hours ago

                  It sounds like it means users are forced to interact with shitty content because the mods won’t remove it.

                • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  You also have the option to not react to people you believe is trolling in bad faith, and report them if you feel they are brewing the rules.

                  Leaving more power in the user’s control- you decide a user is a troll and the mods don’t see it that way, you block them and anyone who does want to see them has the option.

        • john89@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, this proves my point.

          I’m not a tankie, nor am I a right-winger.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      fucking tankies are here to ruin yet another alternative social network. Every. Single. Time. Be it alt-right nuts or alt-left ruining the party for everyone.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        To be honest for people who didn’t use redet a lot, ‘subs’ is very confusing because it doesn’t relate to anything in the Threadyverse.

          • Poik@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            These days? Definitely made sense to me even back when I redditted. I am submissive to catsbeingjerks, hmmm, and Noita.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          The term “podcast” was coined by Ben Hammersley, a BBC journalist and The Guardian columnist, in February 2004. The word is a combination of “iPod” and “broadcast”. Hammersley first used the term in an article for The Guardian.

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Like seriously what would be the connection if it wasn’t the iPod?

            Yeah, “pod” cast, like podracing, you know star wars? Like your car is a pod. So like you cast it directly to your car and it’s like podracing cast pod.

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Short version: yesterday, Lemmy.world announced essentially, though they buried it under lots of distracting verbiage, that they were going to follow in the footsteps of Vichy Twitter and Meta and allow hate speech and misinformation, and probably more to the point, they intend to force recalcitrant mods to allow it regardless of their own views on the matter.

    And the head mod/creator/whatever they are of unpopular opinion took exception to that and locked the community in protest.

    • Zero22xx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Looks like I’ve chosen a good time to join up here… I’m guessing that I’m going to be trying my 3rd instance soon.

      I’m actually wondering what the draw of this place is gonna be once they decide to start behaving exactly like the rest of the platforms. It’s been quite the last 24 hours for me just trying to get set up here between web pages that don’t want to load properly, misleading servers and trying a bunch of different apps that all seem to have something either missing or broken. Like, you have to actually want to be here. I’ve put up with all of this crap so far so that I can use an alternative to Reddit, not just another Reddit with a different url.

      If I wanted to hear conspiracy theories and put up with bigotry, I’d be using fucking Twitter.

      • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The draw is supposed to end up being that you can continue to access more or less all of the same content with all of the same functionality regardless of how badly someone might screw up one or another instance.

        Back when the big Reddit exodus happened, after the whole API debacle, lemmy.world ended up being far and away the most popular instance, and that hasn’t really been good for it. It’s had a bit of a “Reddit with a different URL” reek to it ever since.

        But certainly not coincidentally, its popularity has also waned since, and it already has less of a share of active lemmy users than it had before, which is exactly the way the fediverse is supposed to work. And I would assume that after this last announcement, its popularity is going to take a definite hit.

        I recommend trying a bunch of instances. They’re all at least subtly different, and the best way to figure out which one(s) you prefer is to just spend some time with them. Over time, you’ll just come to use one or maybe a couple more than the rest.

        And I don’t even bother with any of the apps - the basic mobile version of it is actually quite good.(on Firefox at least - I can’t vouch for any other browsers).

        • Zero22xx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Trying to decide if you’re calling me dull or just suggesting an interesting subreddit lol. It does seem like an interesting sub though, sometimes the mundane can be oddly interesting. So thank you.

    • JonsJava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m another mod of the community. Admiral didn’t let me know they were doing this.

      I still 100% support their actions regardless.

      • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        This can certainly happen on Lemmy. And you can bypass it by setting up yourself and your communities on a different instance with more reasonable rules.

        Lemmy can’t change human nature. It does not restrict bad behavior. It offers alternatives. Everyone gets to choose among instances and communities. The hope is that people will shift away from the ones that become toxic when better options are always available. It tends to be a gradual process, but I think it is working.

  • Lumisal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, time to make my alt community account my primary one. See y’all on the other side!

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    You have to allow a little raw chicken in the mayo now.

    So now people are to be allowed to sealion and troll and JAQ off in your community, so long as they do it respectfully.

    Or else.

    Imagine running, say, a community for vulnerable trans kids, and being forced to allow a constant influx of ‘helpful suggestions’, just so long as they’re phrased in pretty language.

    • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Imagine running, say, a community for vulnerable trans kids, and being forced to allow a constant influx of ‘helpful suggestions’, just so long as they’re phrased in pretty language.

      What will happen is Trans kids will go over to one of the trans-friendly instances, and the .world will be where the trans defenders go to debate chuds.

    • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Anyone who’s seen what happens when mods legitimize trolls knows it kills communities. I wish i could have stayed on blahaj but it’s just as toxic as reddit lgbtq spaces now…

        • mortemtyrannis
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There was a person insisting on using the neopronouns ‘dragon fucker’ and the mods decided to honor that.

          No I am not making this up.

              • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                I was just correcting your misrepresentation of drag’s neopronoun. Asking someone to call you dragon fucker every time they referred to you would not be shorthand. Plus, drag’s username was dragon rider where I’ve seen drag.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      We’re going to allow some “flat earth” comments. We’re going to force some moderators to accept some “flat earth” comments

      You… like this? Glad I’m not a mod, this is how places like Reddit became what they are today. Opinions should be allowed, but admins should be able to moderate blatant falsehoods.

      • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Here’s the thing - who cares if someone wants to post about flat earth theories? If people like it, it will be upvoted, and if they don’t, it will be downvoted. Why remove it? That’s the point - let the users decide, not the mods. Power to the people, the mods just step in when they post 10 times in an hour about flat earth theories.

        Unfortunately, you’ll have to switch to subscriptions when you sort by new.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah. I’d rather have people rely on citations and inquisition than trusting mods to keep misinformation at bay.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Reddit is a living emblem of the problem this is trying to solve so I have no idea what you mean.

        Mods can’t be trusted to enforce the truth. It’s far too complicated and they invariably end up enforcing their own distorted view of the world instead.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        We’ve already run into problems with that where mods banned people talking about Israeli war crimes as “misinformation”. Despite it being headline news.

        So that’s obviously not a great system.

        • nyamlae@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          That saying is total bullshit. I’ve seen people say it for years, only to one day turn coats and reveal that they supported the falsehoods all along.

          Sunlight helps scum find other scum.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Policy sentiments aside, wow that post is so up it’s own ass. There was definitely a more concise way to communicate the change.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Seems like they locked the community in protest of recent .world TOS changes. Although I think a much better protest would be to simply refuse to enforce the changes they felt are unsatisfactory.

    • asudox@discuss.tchncs.deM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      …or just migrate the community to another instance? Like why are we in the fediverse? Have people forgotten that if you don’t like a instance, you can just move to another one?

        • queermunist she/her
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s really not. The whole purpose of federation is that you can just go to whatever instance you like best.

            • queermunist she/her
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              But it doesn’t? I moved from .world to .ml last year but I can still go to .world communities to argue with people, just like before. Migration actually should be the first choice.

              • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                This isn’t regarding a user, but where a community is being hosted.

                Are all major community members in Lemmys that are federated to where the community is being moved?

                What happens to the community’s data, since it won’t get carried over?

                What prevents this issue from happening again in a new instance?

                For a platform that is meant to communicate, it seems funny that a lot of people’s gut reactions to coordination problems is to cut all ties and leave.

                • queermunist she/her
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Are all major community members in Lemmys that are federated to where the community is being moved?

                  Depends on where they move, doesn’t it? Obviously if a community moves to hexbear then .world users won’t be able to access it (and that’s .world’s fault). But there’s no need to do that? They can just move to a federated instance and stay connected.

                  What happens to the community’s data, since it won’t get carried over?

                  Does anything have to happen to that data? Why not just leave it behind as a record? I guess they could go through the effort of using a bot to repost everything in the new community if they wanted to preserve everything and not leave it on the old instance.

                  What prevents this issue from happening again in a new instance?

                  Pick a good instance and it won’t happen.

                  .world was always shit, anyone could have seen this coming. It’s always just been a reddit instance.

                  For a platform that is meant to communicate, it seems funny that a lot of people’s gut reactions to coordination problems is to cut all ties and leave.

                  Again, the whole point of federation is that we don’t cut all ties. It’s not like moving communities requires defederating from .world

    • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      From the announcement in question:

      Some communities will receive an immediate notice with a link to this new policy. The most egregious communities will comply, or their moderators will be removed from those communities.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nothing like a good power trip from the admins. Even if mods are power tripping people can make a new community. This was a bad response by admins, they bowed to only the most vocal minority. Vast majority of people have been fine with the moderation on .world. only classy thing to do is to take it back and play it off like it was a trial run that didn’t work out

  • Boozilla@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m not an expert in political philosophy by any measure, but I kind of feel like lemmy.world is a small case study in the pros and cons of realpolitik.