i tried looking up parenti a few days ago and the youtube search kept showing me the same lecture from the 1980’s, so i assumed that that was all there was; but there’s this, so go figure. thank you

Love Parenti. Blackshirts and Reds is essential reading for anyone wanting to take a critical look at the Soviet Union and the modern Leftist landscape, and is written in an easy to understand manner for those entirely unfamiliar with Marxism. He has a remarkable capacity to reach liberals and show how pervasive the Red Scare is, and how subtle it actually was. Rather than purely overt nonsense most liberals can see through like “communism killed 1 billion people blah blah blah,” the most deceptive anticommunism often comes in the form of twisting narratives or subverting data. One of Parenti’s evergreen quotes:

"During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them.

If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum."