The distro family trees are like different pantheons.

Distros are like individual gods. Community developers are priests and end-users are the commoners who pray for blessings, good fortune, and happy lives. Priests direct the prayers of commoners to their respective gods.

There is the Debian pantheon, ancient gods of peace and stillness.

The Arch pantheon, progressive gods that bring revolution along with a bit of chaos.

The Red Hat pantheon, gods tha- wtf am I writing?

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    No but there is an ideological basis for free software though it is firmly based on practical experiences dealing with the consequences of close source devices.

    Red Hat and Ubuntu are business. Debian and Arch are communities. Some of the smaller distros are basically that one guy in Nebraska.

    People promote them for various reasons. An IBM employee will have different reasons to the supporter types who latch on to a distro and mascot like it was a football team. Now football, there is a religion. Its all ritual, nothing they do has any practical use, people congregate once a week and in some parts of the world it turns violent.

    When the deb users start committing genocide on the rpm users I’ll call it a religion. Until then its just a bunch of anime convention fans arguing about their favourite isekai.

  • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The Arch pantheon, progressive gods that bring revolution along with a bit of chaos.

    That’s Fedora, really, Arch did cool packaging and bailed

  • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I mean, this place is filled with a bunch of missionaries asking if yove heard the good word of Linux on every Microsoft Windows post lol

  • eldavi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The Red Hat pantheon, gods tha- wtf am I writing?

    scripture

    amen

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Does that mean that those people who paid a random dude on the internet for GIMP are the altar boys?

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I like how you realized part way through that you were typing out nonsense, and decided to post it anyway lol

    Also: how high are you right now?

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It is too bad his mental health overtook him, with proper medicine that guy could have been such a much more amazing computer science dude. Although maybe the meds would have taken away his inner insight. It amazing that singled handedly he built his own OS. It is a wacky system, but still amazing

      • ace_garp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It is an incredible solo-effort, with largely simplistic features.

        As a usable OS, it’s a fever-dream curiosity.

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Well, it might seem that way sometimes. But in the end, what’s different to religion is that this is all rooted in facts. Facts which are quite abstract, so not everyone gets them and even those who do get them sometimes wonder whether it’s important or not sometimes. The thing is, Linux is at its core a neutral, open and free operating system, and it’s basically the only one which is advanced or mature enough to be a real competitor to let’s say Windows or MacOS. Of course it’s more than a competitor on the server, it’s basically the only relevant server operating system (Windows Server has a niche in application servers within a MS intranet domain, or to control Windows clients via policies, that’s about it, and MacOS server is already long dead I think). Of course, some of Linux’ success is because those same companies also contribute a lot to the development of Linux, because they need it for themselves as well. But that’s just one more thing which makes Linux a very unique thing. It’s like a neutral baseline for an operating system. Like a very capable OS core that everyone works on, even the competition works on it, because they also rely on it.

    That it’s open source and transparent and that anyone can use it or improve it or change it or whatever makes it special, because it’s not a commercial black-box product where you just consume it as-is and have zero rights whatsoever to do or change anything about it. That’s actually incredibly special in today’s commercialized landscape. Its open nature also means it can never die, only grow. And because it’s a proven good system which is also so very different compared to established desktop OSses, it can happen that its users or fans can seem somewhat religious towards it. But, again, compared to religion, religion is based on pure belief (otherwise it would be called fact). There’s nothing religious about Linux or open source software. It’s simply a special operating system, and not in a bad way at all. And closely related to it is, of course, the whole free/open source software movement. Which every user, even those of closed operating systems, can and do benefit from.

    And since today’s commercial software continues growing more and more user hostile (ads, spying, bloat, dark patterns, high prices/software rental models), it’s getting increasingly important to have at least the option of a true alternative. Even users who absolutely hate Linux and open source software should be glad that alternatives do exist, so that once the food they are being fed by Microsoft and so on doesn’t taste good anymore, they at least have an option to switch to something else entirely.

    • eldavi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      … Even users who absolutely hate Linux and open source software should be glad that alternatives do exist, so that once the food they are being fed by Microsoft and so on doesn’t taste good anymore, they at least have an option to switch to something else entirely.

      i’d like to see this message shared to the linuxsucks community on .world. lol

    • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Of course not, they also need to pay tribute to our Lords and Saviors Richard Stallman and Linus Torvalds and make reverences to our supreme god Tux.

      It’s just that they make all of that with extra steps.

    • KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      And saint IGNUcius of the church of emacs. May we recite our confession of faith:

      There is no system but GNU, and Linux is one of its kernels.