• davelA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I’d probably be paying for YouTube, if it were run by a normal media company instead of the world’s largest spy network and personal data broker. There’s no way in hell I’m giving them my credit card information.

    • Grapho
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Yeah I don’t really care about value when it comes to giving money to the guys who work with the NSA and CIA to find ways to more thoroughly spy on every user 24/7, and turned every search into “You asked for x, here’s a dozen pages of what the State Department thinks you should have searched for instead

      Not to mention their genocide profiteering: https://www.mintpressnews.com/project-nimbus-billion-google-amazon-partners-israel/280087/

      • davelA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s not even about the money, it’s literally about the credit card information, and the massive amount of data linked to it.

        • rigatti@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Do they not already know who you are and what you purchase anyway? I’m wondering how much of a difference it makes.

          • davelA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Whether they do or not, Google doesn’t know that that person is the same person as the one who is using YouTube.

              • davelA
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                As I just said, whether they already do or not is beside the point.

      • comfy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        They quite literally don’t have my credit card information. What are you even trying to say here?

          • comfy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I exaggerated for effect, in the way that 99% sure might as well be a fact in this case:

            I have never given them to YouTube, and they have no financial incentive to acquire them AFAIK - holding that kind of PI is a liability so if anything they wouldn’t want it without having a need for it. YouTube can’t even know what countries I live in, my digital identity from the POV of their servers is too fluid and non-unique for my viewing habits to meaningfully correlate; I blend in with many other people also trying to stay hidden from them.

            As for other Alphabet companies, like those engaged in surveillance capitalism who want to scoop up all of the datas, it’s theoretically possible they’ve illegally acquired them from third parties and found a use for it, but there’s just no feasible way they could associate that with most of my online activities, say, this account I’m using. The only people who have a chance at that are certain state intelligence agencies who are eavesdropping the wires, and they have much bigger problems they’re paid to worry about. Hell, unless things have gotten better for them since Snowden, even they might struggle - most of their super cool hacker shit is only really useful if someone’s worth active targeting.