• flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I would make the argument that even under perfectly executed communism space travel is unlikely to end up being the focus

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Funnily enough, it was not a focus for the United Federation of Planets, seeing as having over 100 major inhabited worlds the number of colonies was relatively small and the Starfleet numbers and ships were very small.

      We just see the show’s title and that is is always from the perspective of Starfleet members.

    • Redderthanmisty@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Although, from an ecological point of view, asteroid mining and orbital manufacturing plants would be a good way of offloading the environmental costs of a post-scarcity society.

      But nothing beats a matter replicator.

    • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It would be assuming we do reach post scarcity for all essential goods. There’s more than enough bored people right now that would throw away the rest of their lifespan for a few months in space to fill a intra galactic space exploration organization; give those bored people all the free education they can handle and you have a successful star fleet.

      • eldavi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I always felt like I was born too early for Starfleet.

        I seriously would offer my life to this end; exploring space like Archer might have done.

      • flashgnash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 minutes ago

        How do you see something like that and your first thought is to respond with hostility