• SubArcticTundra
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My country used to have communism. Niche shops like this barely ever started as small businesses and instead usually started out as specialized departments of large all-encompassing state corporations. Instead of there being a company that specialized in making furniture, the furniture would be made by the logging company. The company that ran a chemical plant would directly sell shampoos, paints, toothpaste, fertillizer, etc. It cut out middle men but the products were usually crap quality because it couldn’t focus on each product individually. This stifled progress. My dad wanted to learn programming (this was the late 80s) but because the government was too oldschool to open a computer science degree programme, the only way to get near a computer was to go to a university that specialized in mining and take a programme in mining machine automation.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      On the flipside, it’s not illegal anywhere in capitalismland™ for the workers to own the means of production. It’s called a cooperative. Get a bunch of your comrades together, sign a few legal documents, pool your money for a downpayment, get a loan. Badabing, badaboom, “communist” unicycle repair shop.

      (The bank might however disagree with you that a unicycle repair shop is a viable business venture in most cities, but hey in my book that still beats a Central Planning Bureau telling you “Nyet, no-one needs unicycles, however we need you at the mines, glory to Arstotzka!”).

      • SubArcticTundra
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. Actually a capitalism with cooperatives is the flavor of capitalism that I support.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It works until a guy with too much money decides it must stops. That’s the problem with capitalism: it basically recreates feudalism.

        The biggest question is who gets the power. A dictatorial state or an oligarchy of capitalists is the same.

        Liberalism won against USSR because they restrained themselves just long enough for USSR to collapse.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was not talking about liberalism… ? Cooperatives work. The statutes can say whatever they want about wealth distribution as long as the company keeps paying its creditors.

          Saying “It works until a guy with too much money decides it must stops” is just a huge self-own coming from a communist, because if the internal and democratic redistribution of wealth of a co-op stops working… well capitalism ain’t anything to go with that, that’s just communism falling in on itself and (as happened with all real communist states) turning into an authoritarian kleptocracy.

          Still, overall co-ops work pretty well. Lots of banks are famously co-ops (i.e. credit unions). Obviously they haven’t solved the problems of greed or poverty, but that’s only surprising if you think that “seizing the means of production” is the only condition required for complete emancipation of the proletariat (which one would only think if they had never taken a single look at the history of the USSR).

      • masquenox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        On the flipside, it’s not illegal anywhere in capitalismland™

        It’s also not illegal in capitalismland™ to use economic chicanery to outcompete and either destroy or swallow any productive organization that doesn’t sacrifice everything to the profit principle - which might explain why there is no need for it to make co-ops illegal.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bad management is not the the specialty of communism. In fact, this is a governance problem: is it lead by an idiot and how can people change the lead to solve this problem. Capitalism has this problem currently with governments and companies directions totally unable to do anything about climate change and wealth inequalities.

      People always mistaken dictature or oligarchy with communism unfortunately.