like what if linux still was open source but had a lot of proprietary dependencies and packages and became more popular and therefore proprietary software came to it?? but it still would let you use any desktop environment and there would be a new proprietary desktop environment which was like gnome but easier

  • Eugenia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unlike what people reply here out of ignorance, your thinking is correct, meaning, that Google has already done the hard work to create a TRULY modern OS, with proper usability, security, and yes, a way better compositor than wayland (in fact, android has the best compositor in the world, compared to ANY OS). A properly modified desktop OS based on it (better than Samsung’s DeX for example), that is also able to run normal Linux apps, would be a huge winner.

    • tekato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      TRULY modern OS

      What does this even mean? So iOS, MacOS, Windows11, Linux aren’t modern?

      a way better compositor than wayland (in fact, android has the best compositor in the world, compared to ANY OS)

      Wayland is not a compositor, it’s a protocol. SurfaceFlinger can totally be made in Wayland. Saying SurfaceFlinger is better than Wayland is like saying words are better than English.

      A properly modified desktop OS based on it (better than Samsung’s DeX for example), that is also able to run normal Linux apps, would be a huge winner.

      Nobody will ever use this on Linux, unless it is implemented in Wayland. It is infinitely more likely for Android to rewrite its compositor for Wayland than SurfaceFlinger being adopted as Linux’s main compositor.

      • Eugenia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Wayland is not as advanced as android’s system, so i don’t see why not use android’s. The license for it is fine.