• takeda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Stop changing the topics and answer that simple question. You are all about peace, so tell me:

    1. who needs to sacrifice what to achieve the peace?
    2. how Ukraine can trust Russia that after 2003, 2014, 2018, 2022 they finally will stop it once and for all?

    You must have something in mind, or are you saying that you have no idea what you’re talking about?

    • ghost_laptop
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again you didn’t address a single point and diverted everything with pseudo arguments.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not changing any topics. I’m pointing out the how utterly morally bankrupt your position is. The reality of the situation is that it was possible to avoid the war, and all Ukraine had to do to achieve that was to stay neutral. Ukraine joining NATO was a red line for Russia, and this is something that was well known both in Ukraine and in the west. Countless western experts have been warning about this for many decades. This only became controversial to mention after the war started. Here’s what Chomsky has to say on the issue recently:

      https://truthout.org/articles/us-approach-to-ukraine-and-russia-has-left-the-domain-of-rational-discourse/

      https://truthout.org/articles/noam-chomsky-us-military-escalation-against-russia-would-have-no-victors/

      50 prominent foreign policy experts (former senators, military officers, diplomats, etc.) sent an open letter to Clinton outlining their opposition to NATO expansion back in 1997:

      George Kennan, arguably America's greatest ever foreign policy strategist, the architect of the U.S. cold war strategy warned that NATO expansion was a "tragic mistake" that ought to ultimately provoke a "bad reaction from Russia" back in 1998.

      Jack F. Matlock Jr., US Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987-1991, warning in 1997 that NATO expansion was "the most profound strategic blunder, [encouraging] a chain of events that could produce the most serious security threat [...] since the Soviet Union collapsed"

      Even Gorbachev warned about this. All these experts were marginalized, silenced, and ignored. Yet, now people are trying to rewrite history and pretend that Russia attacked Ukraine out of the blue and completely unprovoked.

      The reality is that it’s Ukraine that refused to implement Minsk while attacking civilian population in Donbas as CNN reported at the time. Now, western and Ukrainian leaders have actually admitted on record that they never planned to implement Minsk and it was a play for time.

      You must have something in mind, or are you saying that you have no idea what you’re talking about?

      I’m saying that it’s either you who has no idea what you’re talking about or you’re just an outright liar. Either way it’s a pretty bad look. War happened because of people like you, and now hundreds of thousands of people have died, millions have had their lives ruined, and Ukraine will lose a huge chunk of its territory in the best case scenario. All of this happened because the west and Ukraine refused to negotiate.