• ree
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    This paper don’t answer my question which is:

    There is no breakdown of the share distribution amongst workers.

    Give me a source answer this and I retract my claim of misinformation.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Your claim of misinformation is baseless. I gave you the information I was able to find that provides a decent idea of what the split looks like. If you want to find a more detailed split I full trust in your ability to use Google on your own.

      • ree
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        but that’s the thing.

        Baseless claim and misrepresenting data is misinformation.

        You don’t answer my question and make claims. I don’t find anything online to contextualize that number hence my first comment :

        without knowing the distribution of shares amongst staff that average means nothing.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          What data are you claiming is being misrepresented?

          You just made up a claim that isn’t sourced or based on anything. Your original comment is perfectly reasonable. We don’t know what the exact distribution of shares is. However, the article I found for you does give a bit of an insight into that. If you’re curious to find out more exact numbers then please do that instead of making unsubstantiated claims.

          • ree
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            In your title. You added the “average” information which is not present in the article you linked.

            That information at first glance suggest that each worker get $75k.

            Reporting an average without other distribution parameters is a misleading practice.

            edit: typo

              • ree
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 years ago

                Ho, now we’re getting personal. good. I’ve got a degree in statistics.

                What you wrote is still misleading.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  It’s only misleading if you don’t understand the difference between the average and the median, which somebody with a degree in statistics certainly should. You basically made up some nonsense and stuck to your guns for two days now. Bravo, that’s some real dedication to trolling.

                  • ree
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    Again with the personals.

                    1. You decided to include that information in the title for a reason.

                    2. When I pointed out that it was misleading you answered with a source that has not relevance to my comment.

                    I think that your behavior is deliberate and that you’re spreading misleading information.