• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Maybe should read the wiki links you’re spamming? 😂

    What I’m talking about, is that Ukraine is a big wide open steppe through which majority of the invading forces attack. The fact that you can’t understand this really is phenomenal.

    And obviously you’re pretending that neither has the technology changed, and obviously 1000km of steppe is the best possible approach, since aircraft, drones, satellites and tactical missiles of nukes are not an option

    And obviously you’re ignorant of how actual warfare works given then you think you can win a war without ground invasion. You’re like a poster child for the Dunning-Kruger effect.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Oh look, the same clown who’s cheering for Ukrainians to keep dying in a senseless war pretends to give a fuck about people in Sudan. You ain’t fooling anybody.

        • harc@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Out of 2 forces that reached Moscow, which one went through Ukraine?

            • harc@szmer.info
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              You’d do anything not to accept the fact, that your argument is absolute bullshit, wouldn’t you?

              Poles raided Moscow, and set their Czar btw, going straight through current day Belarus. So did the French reach it. So attempted the Germans. The argument of Ukraine being needed for that has no basis neither in history nor modern warfare.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                It’s obvious that you’re not interested in honest or rational discussion here and just keep deflecting. I love how you think you’re being clever while being utterly transparent.

                • harc@szmer.info
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  What’s “deflecting” about giving you very simple, clear historical evidence your argument is invalid?

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    your reply had fuck all to do with the comment you replied to

                    Oh look, the same clown who’s cheering for Ukrainians to keep dying in a senseless war pretends to give a fuck about people in Sudan. You ain’t fooling anybody.

                    Faced with the fact that you don’t actually give a shit about other people, you simply hop on to a different topic like the clown that you are.