Except the Genocide went from mostly quiet, to very loud and explicit. While there has been a genocide agianst Palistinians for quite a wile now, this is the first time in a long time that it has hit the news cycle, or even been this undeniable, so it would make sense that a party that pretends to be lesser evilism, but is letting a genocide accelerate is not going to be able to retain votes.
While it would be obvious if you followed closely that Democrats never cared about Palestinians, they had some plausible deniability. They could pretend to care about innocents without really adopting any kind of policy. After 2023 they had to actually take a position one way or the other and everyone could see which side they supported. They didn’t even try to feign neutrality anymore, they were full-genocide.
but they were for it in 2020?
I am sorry I do not know what you mean can you elaborate please?
According to that graph they voted overwhelmingly for Democrats in 2020.
So they were OK in 2020 with whatever they were protesting in 2024.
Except the Genocide went from mostly quiet, to very loud and explicit. While there has been a genocide agianst Palistinians for quite a wile now, this is the first time in a long time that it has hit the news cycle, or even been this undeniable, so it would make sense that a party that pretends to be lesser evilism, but is letting a genocide accelerate is not going to be able to retain votes.
While it would be obvious if you followed closely that Democrats never cared about Palestinians, they had some plausible deniability. They could pretend to care about innocents without really adopting any kind of policy. After 2023 they had to actually take a position one way or the other and everyone could see which side they supported. They didn’t even try to feign neutrality anymore, they were full-genocide.
The genocide in Gaza started in 2023.
It wasn’t genocide before 2023?
I see your point, however it was far less kinetic a year and a half ago.
That’s an understatement, yes.