• ours@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    2 months ago

    Meanwhile Synology keeps updating my ageing NAS.

    They may not have the best bang for the buck for hardware but their software package is really well put together.

  • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yet again another reason why I won’t buy proprietary systems like this. Make your own, if you know what a NAS is I’m sure you van handle it.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Lenovo did this when they bought Iomega NAS devices. The final firmware before they ended support added google ads to the web admin interface. So now I have it booting Debian and OpenMediaVault, bye bye Lenovo.

    • SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Just YSK, vlan is not a security measure. It enumerates Ethernet packages with a number different than zero, and you can see all vlans if the network card decides it. So if some other device on your net is compromised, there is a chance traffic to your vulnerable box can be too. ( it gets a little more complicated with vlan aware switches in the middle. But not impossible)

      Edit: BTW I feel you I too have a bit of older hardware thats on their own net where I just hope nothing bad happens til I come around to replacing it…

    • ky56@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Banana Pi R3 or R64 (OpenWRT). Some DIY assembly required but it will probably last you over a decade.

      My favorite part about these is that they are unbrickable. There is no bootloader to permanently corrupt as the firmware that loads the flash chip is in mask memory and the firmware you load from OpenWRT is the bootloader + firmware. So even if the flash chip dies you can use the other flash chip on the board or with soldering skills replace it and re-flash it.

  • corroded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The article didn’t specify how old the affected models are, but any time you use an all-in-one device with proprietary software, you take the risk of this happening.

    To some extent, you can’t really blame the manufacturers for this, either. They can’t reasonably continue maintaining software for their products for an indefinite period of time. As an extreme example, I wouldn’t expect the old Linksys wifi router I used in 2004 to still be receiving firmware updates.

    My NAS hardware is relatively ancient, but it’s regular server hardware running TrueNAS. If TrueNAS suddenly stops getting updates, there’s UnRaid, or just Linux. It really goes to show the advantage of using generic hardware with open software.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      you can’t really blame the manufacturers for this, either. They can’t reasonably continue maintaining software for their products for an indefinite period of time.

      Shh, anytime I say this about Windows I get people coming out of the woodwork that say Windows 7 should be supported 15 years later.

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Don’t you know that it’s entirely unreasonable to expect your users to have hardware that’s a standard feature on any machine made in the last ten years, that can be added to existing systems for around $30 and a free card slot? /s

        I don’t think I’ll ever understand the insistence that a TPM module is a bridge too far.

        • InFerNo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          My PC has a tpm, the CPU is simply on the unsupported list.

        • Feyd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Because of the sheer amount of e-waste it will generate by force-decommissioning hardware in active usage. Don’t know why that’s so hard to understand.

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The only reason that’s any different than any other time Microsoft has released a new OS is that more people own computers now than ever before, improvements in hardware power have slowed significantly, and people are more outspoken online now.

            It’s still not reasonable to expect them to support all hardware forever on an aging codebase.

            I understand the frustration, but this isn’t some new thing for this new OS in particular.

            • Feyd@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              You’re extrapolating to “forever”. I just want to reduce e-waste by not forcing people to get new computers they don’t want or need yet. Every year of additional service life, more people upgrade hardware for other reasons.

    • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I expect security patches for the tires on my Model T. Ford is still around, so what’s the ploblem?

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        For those kind of devices, the manufacturer should be required to make it possible to easily load a third-party firmware when they declare a device as obsolete.

        I understand it’s not financially viable to support a device beyond a certain threshold, but there’s likely a community behind those that are willing to keep these devices alive for a while longer, with the benefit of reducing the amount of ewaste.

  • blackfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just looked it up and the DNS-320 Version 1.00 is from 2010. I get it on the company side thats old and was a given to be out of date. People who own it should take more mitigations to protect against any unwanted connections. Or use something that doesn’t rely on proprietary firmwares like truenas or unraid.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yup, doesn’t surprise me.

    I also have a NAS box that’s out of support. Turned off all of the nifty services and firewalled the shit out of it so it won’t be visible outside the LAN even by accident. Will replace it with a FreeBSD box as soon as I get a new hard drive.

  • bear_cube@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    A NAS, a router or Storage server all of the are computer. Just use old computer as nas instead of throwing them away.

    • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Doesn’t matter to the D-Link bean counters. Either case is a non-sale to them. Never mind that they tank whatever is left of their already terrible reputation, all they care about is immediate shareholder revenue generation, and spending money maintaining software for older hardware is a loss to them.