• w3dd1e@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I say this as a woman who is pretty bummed to say this.

    I don’t think women candidates can win over enough men to get votes on a national level. Radicalized men aren’t ever going to empathize with women and sure as hell aren’t going to vote for one anytime soon.

    Obviously there is a lot more than that, but it’s a big part of it.

    • isaaclw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      I still think it was policy and not gender :/

      But I understand that the evidence isn’t exactly clear on this.

      • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        It’s definitely both but it’s starting to look clearer that a man can potentially overcome the potential policy issue and a woman just can’t.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Americans choosing Trump twice instead of a moderate woman candidate is all the proof I need that the country won’t have a woman become president in my lifetime.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    do you risk nominating candidates who then can’t appeal

    Here’s a wild idea. Let the voters nominate their own candidates in a primary without tons of interference from the DNC and super delegates. Or you know, just allow a primary at all.

  • servobobo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Our voters constantly and consistently reject candidates and policies that only benefit billionaires and their stooges, what could that ever mean to the electability of our candidate who fawns over Reagan staffers?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ll never understand why people think the people running the DNC aren’t total fucking liars that will say anything for money.

    Beating trump isn’t hard.

    But beating him while grifting a billion dollar campaign funded by the people your voting base hates is very difficult.

    Unfortunately when confronted with the choice, the DNC has shown us three elections straight that they’ll always pick money over votes.

    So we either need to leave the party or replace leadership.

    If we don’t do either 2028 will be exactly the same as the last three elections.

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Find your local/state Dems, get involved with them, figure out who the conservatives are and replace them… It’s not hard, like 10 people vote in those elections… They are the ones who elect DNC leadership, take the local and state parties, take the DNC

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Lol, you haven’t heard what the “victory fund” really is yet, have you?

        The state parties have to toe the line, or they’re abandoned.

        Terrible strategy if the plan is getting Dems in office, great move if you’re blocking any real progress in exchange for bribes donations.

    • sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Beating trump isn’t hard.

      He won three out of four primaries, and two out of three general elections. It seems… pretty fucking hard.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Well, he won his own party primaries too, and by a landslide. So it’s not just the DNC that can’t beat him. People are still trying to play by the old playbook where things like qualifications, competency, and sanity matter. Trump is out there doing something that absolutely works, telling the people whatever they want to hear, regardless of how stupid, impossible, or untrue it is.

      • optional@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Don’t you worry, you’ll have an election. Even the Germans had elections during their darkest times. That doesn’t mean you’ll have a choice though.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I lived thru 9/11 and 2016.

        For over 20 years everytime a republican became president I’ve been told we’ll never have another election.

        Maybe this time the wolf is real, but it’s a basic part of human psychology that more and more people will stop having a fear response everytime they hear “wolf”.

        If we really don’t have an election in 2028, we’ll have a civil war before 2032. Maybe what comes after will be better than what we have now.

        It sucks to live in interesting times, but that’s what’s happening.

        This is literally the day after the election, don’t fucking tell me it’s too late to plan how to fix shit for 2028

        • Nutteman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 hours ago

          If it were like 2016 I’d be less worried but taking into account what happened with the 2020 election and now facist rhetoric has reached new heights. They want King Trump and I am worried they will get it.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Shit. I was more worried in 2016.

            He didn’t leave office peacefully, but he still left.

            That’s how human brains work, we avoided the worst case scenario and life moved on. So we run into the same danger, but the response is lowered.

            Which is why Dem turnout was so low this time

            I’ve been saying this would happen for a long time, lots of people were.

            The difference is the people running the DNC are just the people who can raise the most money. And the people with psychology degrees rarely have money as a priority.

            We need to start having a party run by sociologists, psychologists, hell even go back to lawyers

            The current strategy of 80s go-go Reaganites who only care about money ain’t working.

            • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Why were you more worried in 2016? He literally attempted to stage a coup and it failed. That’s why he left. Did you expect him to start an armed insurrection by himself?

              I don’t remember “this may be the last election ever” being a mainstream or credible narrative for any election prior to 2020… you know… The one he tried to make the last election ever.

              Your comment is exceptionally naive, and probably the same sentiment that lead to Trumps win. Americans are completely ignorant to the reality of the situation; liberals included.

    • eldavi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      people have been beating this drum for decades and i, for today only, am wondering if it’s having any impact despite it being completely true and easy to see.

    • sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      For a long time, they didn’t. The RNC was legendarily attacked by the Tea Party movement, by Trump during the 2016 primaries, and continued to be slated by MAGA up to the point it was wholly taken over by Trump.

    • stringere@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Because one delivers on its promises. They promise hate and divisiveness and deliver in kind. Democrats promise hope when what we need is action.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What action do you think we should do? Real talk. The government has been taken over a long time ago by anti-democracy peeps, how do we get it back?

      • sundray@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Maybe it’s the fact that America’s national character is to lust for domination and revenge. Compassion cannot win because America despises it.

  • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    In a sane world, literally anyone would have beaten trump. A rotten ham sandwich would have won a write in vote over trump.

    I do not blame Democrats for running a bad campaign.

    I blame the jellyfish stimulus eater organisms that insist they’re the same species as me who were “not impressed” by Harris but were dazzled by the funny orange meme man with the dick sucking dance.

    At this point I don’t hate Trump supporters any more. They’re just dogs. I hate the left for allowing us to get to this stage.

    I hope the apocalypse is painful for everyone. It would be the first instance of justice our species would experience.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This attitude is generally insane.

      “I don’t hate racists, I hate people who hate genocide so much they can’t stomach voting for it.”

      Look, I voted for Harris, but it wasn’t easy. Because that blood is on this administrations hands. The party is moving further and further away from my ideals every election. Because they keep moving right. On immigration, tax breaks, health care, foreign policy. She was courting the fuckin neocons!!!

      I understand how frustrating it is, because you’re right—not allowing trump to win is better than allowing him. But it’s not so straightforward when your vote is support for something you can’t stomach. Can you understand how that is difficult for people? I sure can. But I also understand how many people stand to get hurt under an authoritarian regime, so i sacrificed my morals again to do what I can to somewhat stem the bleeding.

      But that’s not an easy decision to make. Much harder than, say, blaming the racists for racism, and not the people who are anti-racist.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        The dismissal and condescension towards Arab-Americans who were upset over Gaza was fucking insane. That isn’t going to be forgotten.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have to say that by all means, Harris’ campaign was not a failure by any means. She rocked most of the debates and her speeches were insane. Her only issue was the lack of a proper procedure for being elected at primary candidate, and she focused on ideologies that alienated her from the more centrist and slightly red leaning views.

      But despite what has been being spammed in the lemmy communities for months now, her way of being elected was just the old way, that was replaced by the current primaries. I don’t agree that they didn’t hold another primary but, I also can totally see the argument of “We can’t just hold back the election process because someone dropped out”

      Harris’ main campaign goals alienated a crucial part of the voters though, which was the side that had given up on Trump but had no valid alternative. I had so many friends that if they gave a reason for voting for trump it was “I don’t really want to, but I have no other choice, and there is no way I can vote for her because of what her standing is with rights are”.

      I don’t personally agree with the ideology but, sadly she needed those votes the people who didn’t vote for trump, ended up doing write in instead of voting blue, because coming out super strong with that as the main argument more or less pushed them back into voting Trump.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        there is no way I can vote for her because of what her standing is with rights are".

        What does this mean? Do your friends actually talk like that?