There’s some weird “-philia” for those that is totally obsessed with the 18-21 age group, even if it’s not illegal.
He/Him | Hu/En/some Jp | ASD | Bi | C/C++/D/C#/Java
There’s some weird “-philia” for those that is totally obsessed with the 18-21 age group, even if it’s not illegal.
Except it will be X city by Elon Musk.
The issue is, who comes after him, and in what way. Will it be an election, will it be one of his deadbeat sons, or JD Vance?
They’re only “legit” if the people are letting them to be.
Who are those consultants? We need to brigade them, in Minecraft of course.
He might have said that line due to his mental decay, but it’s still troubling. I wouldn’t be surprized if he either used his new found powers to make himself the king of the US, or just discontinued the elections due to some sham “emergency measures”. If any of these comes true, the worlds only hope is that allegedly the US military is more left-leaning, at least compared to the US police that is packed full of ex-KKK members and ex-skinheads.
I’m from Hungary, and we were told Fidesz won’t subvert democracy, won’t have total media control, won’t have censorship of queer media, and won’t have a “foreign agents” law. Now they’re planning with Fidesz governance until 2050 (!) at least.
I wonder what he thinks by ending the Gaza genocide. I have a feeling it’ll mean an accelerated one.
There’s a lot of christian fundamentalists among them too, and I think the “sitting out of it” could have affected that demographic too.
A lot of them thought it won’t be that bad, or it’s just a bluff.
It was a multitude of reasons, Twitter being in the hands of Elon (who pushed the hashtags #genocidejoe
and #holocaustharris
, but I wouldn’t be surprized if he also misinformed people about the election dates), other social media stopped enforcing their community guidelines to be “unbiased”, media was way harder on Kamala than on Trump (including the downplaying of the mental decay and insanity of Trump), the whole “let’s try to appeal to moderate conservatives” thing, etc.
Let me guess, the “responsibility” we have to take is to “double down on moving to the right”.
Not a good look for your side, not a good look.
If there ever will be a true left-populist candidate, they can call your side “evil-for-evil-sake” and “ill intentioned”.
A lot of this are encouraged under the table. Any plans on it is usually talked rather than texed, so there will be less chance of it that it could surface, and is between the most trustworthy people.
With the levels of anti-intellectualism, it’s also quite hard.
You write more that 3 lines? You used a “buzzword”? Congratulations, your refutation won’t be read, but will met with ridicule!
My mother’s boyfriend often “reads” articles from more liberal-leaning news sources, and he just laughs at the buzzwords. Cannot tell what the articles were about.
It’s Sharia law for christian fundamentalists.
I have a feeling someone paid good money for Snopes and similar sites. Or have some kompromat on rheir editors.
To some of the comments:
When a black person does a bad thing, we never question their blackness. If an LGBTQ+ person does a bad thing, we never question their LGBTQ±ness. If a Muslim does a bad thing, we never question their Muslimness.
If a Christian does a bad thing, they’re not a Christian. If they’re rich, we bring up the parts of the Bible about how the rich won’t get to heavens. If they’re hateful, we bring up Christ’s love. If they’re violent, we bring up the “other cheeck” line.
We need to stop whitewashing Christianity, and realize the evil its capable of in the wrong hands. That’s how we got the dominionist cult into the most powerful country, and that’s how we got Putin, Orbán, etc., and will continue to get others if we dont change our outlook on things.
Because they made us believe they come to there by the same position as us.
My stepmother sabotaged a lot of financial support for me from my father, because she read those “rags to riches” stories. She even liked to complain about a coworker of her “spoiling his son” by giving him financial support.
The con in conservatism is that it convinced billions of people all around the world, it stands for “respectful conversation of traditionalism”, rather than “conversation of power”.
Besides of the abandonment of the working class, white cishet men were steadily losing their power in society. They no longer can crack jokes at the expense of minorities. They’re no longer guaranteed to get a loving wife that won’t abandon them even if they’re abusive as hell. So the social contract that only existed in their head was broken, and want to undo it all, ASAP, no matter the cost. It’s just conservatives tried to not care about women gaining rights, especially up until women didn’t live with them. Same with the rights of other marginalized folks.