Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 29 days agoBlueFash are already working on the narrative for putting their loss on Muslims if they lose.hexbear.netimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1211arrow-down12
arrow-up1209arrow-down1imageBlueFash are already working on the narrative for putting their loss on Muslims if they lose.hexbear.netFrank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net to chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 29 days agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squarePolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-229 days agoI wonder what would president Harris do if Lawrence v. Texas gets invalidated during her term like Roe v. Wade was during Biden’s
minus-squarevovchik_ilich [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·edit-229 days agoFellow comrade, I’m not aware of what Lawrence v. Texas is. Can you enlighten me or point me towards a good source?
minus-squarePolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-229 days agoIt’s the court precedence by which SCOTUS invalidated sodomy laws on federal level, therefore legalising homosexuality in entire country. In 2003 no less, so US despite all of the posturing was still deeply in the tail behind most western countries.
I wonder what would president Harris do if Lawrence v. Texas gets invalidated during her term like Roe v. Wade was during Biden’s
Fellow comrade, I’m not aware of what Lawrence v. Texas is. Can you enlighten me or point me towards a good source?
It’s the court precedence by which SCOTUS invalidated sodomy laws on federal level, therefore legalising homosexuality in entire country. In 2003 no less, so US despite all of the posturing was still deeply in the tail behind most western countries.