• acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    To repeat immortal words of the sage Pierce Piers Morgan, “what should the Iranian government do?”.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        76
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        Absolutely. And the Israelis should dismantle the apartheid, end the occupation, get the fuck on their side of their 1967 border, and recognize the sovereign Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza. Plus, they should hand over their war criminals to the ICC and start a Truth and Reconciliation process. Throw in paying reparations, because why the fuck not.

        Somehow I don’t think though that Pierce Piers Morgan would accept that as a valid answer when he was asking “what should the Israeli government do”. Do you? Because if you do, I will also accept your answer about the terrorist groups. 100%.

        • sheogorath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          25 days ago

          I lost my shit when he interviewed Lowkey for the second time, and Lowkey asked him if he condemned Rupert Murdoch because he publicly funds illegal Israeli settlers, providing evidence to support his claim. All the life drained from his face, and he immediately ended the interview.

        • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          Isn’t his name piers? I feel like we should be making fun of him for that alone. Like who tf names their kid piers?

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    It’s unlikely they’ll attack before the election, if they do. They know every escalation is another vote for Trump, and even Iran doesnt want Trump in power. My guess is they’re going to see who wins and what comes out of it before making any decisions.

    • Count042
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      This analysis ignores the internal motivations for foreign policy.

        • Count042
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          25 days ago

          Iran has it’s own internal politics and factions it needs to appease.

          This is true of most countries too.

          The US invasion of Iraq had far more to do with internal politics than it did with any actions of Saddam.

          The current elected leader of Iran was actually the concillatory to the west candidate, elected when tensions were not quite as high.

          Now that tensions are high, he has to prove he’s not too weak to his own constituency, as the Persian people come together under what they consider to be an unjust attack.

          Again, this is true in general for most countries. Foreign policy is driven far more by domestic politics then most people consider.

          • Sundial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            25 days ago

            Their display of strength was displayed during th Oct 1 attacks. I’m not saying a follow up attack by Iran is unlikely. I’m saying the plitical situation in America currently, and whatever it is after Nov 5th, will be a big factor in what they decide to do.

            • Count042
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              25 days ago

              Their Oct 1 attacks were in response to the assassination of Nasrallah, in combination with a response to the assassination of a visiting diplomat in Tehran from a separate attack from Israel.

              Iran agreed not to respond to the assassination because the US promised that if Iran didn’t respond, the US would secure a peace deal for Gaza.

              The fact that they delivered and the US didn’t is well known to the Persian people, even if it isn’t here. And, the lack of response was considered internally there as encouraging Israeli aggression.

              The whole ‘nothing is more important than the US election’ is far less accurate than you think it is.

      • Sundial@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        25 days ago

        Trump is an even bigger Zionist supporter than Biden, which is pretty impressive considering how much support Biden gives them.

        On top of that, he also did a lot of bad things towards Iran when he was president like sabotaging a deal Obama setup meant to ensure Iran has no nukes in favor of less sanctions and better relations. He also assassinated their top general Soleimani.

  • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    What were soldiers doing in hospitals and schools? It’s almost like they wanted to get themselves blown up!

    Oh, my bad. Wrong place. I got it confused with this one:

    “A Major Massacre” in Jabaliya; Israeli Forces Raid Kamal Adwan Hospital in Northern Gaza, Killing Patients

    Or maybe it was this one:

    Israel strike on Gaza school-turned-shelter kills 17, hospital says

    Damn, maybe it was this one:

    Israeli attack closes last functioning hospital in north Gaza

    Found it! I was thinking of this one:

    Israeli shelling of Gaza school kills at least 22

    Well, it’s at least one of those.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      What Iranian hospitals or schools did Israel hit?

      Based on intelligence, IAF aircraft struck missile manufacturing facilities used to produce the missiles that Iran fired at the State of Israel over the last year. These missiles posed a direct and immediate threat to the citizens of the State of Israel. Simultaneously, the IDF struck surface-to-air missile arrays and additional Iranian aerial capabilities, that were intended to restrict Israel’s aerial freedom of operation in Iran. Source

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        25 days ago

        Exactly. I guess the missile accuracy varies depending on the direction launched.

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      So all of article mention that the claims comes from the most immoral army in the world

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 days ago

    So…what really happened? Israel says it did a “crippling” attack on all of Iran’s air defenses and ability to make drones and missiles. Iran says it intercepted most of the attack, limiting the extent of the damage, though with some fatalities (as definitively noted in the article). I’ve heard conflicting accounts of whether Israel fired from outside Iranian airspace or whether they were doing laps around Tehran. I’ve seen multiple videos of Iran’s air defense in action, but these can be cherry-picked.

    Obviously there is going to be an enormous amount of censorship, propaganda, and straight up misinformation. Good luck getting actual good info.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I wonder how long these two will keep attacking each other in the name of their right to defend themselves. They should attack at the same time so both can say it was retaliation for the another’s simultaneous attack, it’s a perfect plan, both can say they got the last word and stop. Waiting for my Nobel peace prize.

  • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    “Alright, Israel has been a thorn in our side for too long! Launch the missiles!”

    “Yes sir! Where shall we strike?”

    “The outskirts of their cities in unpopulated, barren land. They need to know to fear us.”

    “But sir, what if this merely causes them to accept that we are only a potential threat through our missiles and, given the absence of damage from our previous attack, they feel emboldened and destroy our manufacturing sites, silos, and launch pads.”

    “Impossible. Strike their wastelands.”

    Who could have seen this coming?

    Edit: am I really the only one that saw this coming? Didn’t realize Hellen Keller had so many accounts.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      Iran was playing by Western rules, drop rockets on areas not likely to have casualties or be strategic. It’s supposed to be a de-escalation. They didn’t account for Israel clearly wanting to escalate this war into another regional conflict of them against the entire middle east.

      • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        I mean… it’s Netanyahu at the reins. To be honest, I’m not even sure whether he likes Israelis or dislikes Palestinians, he might just be a violence enthusiast bringing his hobby to work with him

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          25 days ago

          When it comes to Israel this is a naive take. Hatred for Palestinians and other Arabs (especially those “intruding” upon their divinely promised lands) permeates all layers of Israeli society. You could get any Israeli politician (even the “leftist” ones) to rule and they’d do similar things, with maybe more or less effort into ceasefire negotiations.

          • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            Their divinely promised lands that they never had before 1940. Just reminding everyone that Western powers gave international Jews land that was already occupied, based on a book of fairy tales from the Bronze Age. We created this problem.

            • solo@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              24 days ago

              Please do keep in mind that Zionists and Jews are not synonyms. Jews have been opposing Zionism since its inception and keep doing so in large numbers. See also:

              Our Approach to Zionism - JVP - Jewish Voice for Peace

              Jewish Voice for Peace is guided by a vision of justice, equality and freedom for all people. We unequivocally oppose Zionism because it is counter to those ideals.

          • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            25 days ago

            Well, I didn’t mean to be taken literally. Netanyahu understands espionage and murder and is supreme executor of all affairs. Expecting anything else from his Israel is just silly. Frankly, I just want to know whether Iran will make the next decade a nightmare for me with their response. That one is up in the air.